Want Fries With Your Part-time Job?

J

JAMESBJOHNSON

Guest
My local paper does the Obama job happy dance as it continues to shrink and shed jobs.
 
I don't do cut and paste.

I didn't say you do. I just said your OP sounds like a blurt without the article.

You should consider the blurts. Apparently there is some sort of thread conservation project underway with payday spearheading it. We all have some sort of quota we need to adhere to.
 
I didn't say you do. I just said your OP sounds like a blurt without the article.

You should consider the blurts. Apparently there is some sort of thread conservation project underway with payday spearheading it. We all have some sort of quota we need to adhere to.

I'm now a goose-stepping fascist, conservatives are too liberal for me.
 
I didn't say you do. I just said your OP sounds like a blurt without the article.

You should consider the blurts. Apparently there is some sort of thread conservation project underway with payday spearheading it. We all have some sort of quota we need to adhere to.

Fucking retards like you enjoy stupid fucking retarded stories like this:
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/29ec...3f3ce/house-leaders-move-plan-fund-government

All twisted words, lies, and assumptions.

Me? A conservative? Ha.
 
I don't do cut and paste.

I got your back bro!

http://www.cnbc.com/id/102243878
However, the household survey, which is an actual head count, presents details that show there's still plenty of work to do.

A few figures to consider: That big headline number translated into just 4,000 more working Americans. There were, at the same time, another 115,000 on the unemployment line. That disparity can be explained through an expanding labor force, which grew 119,000, though the participation rate among that group remained at 62.8 percent, which is just off the year's worst level and around a 36-year low.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/labor-force-participation-remains-36-year-low-0
$ said:
The participation rate, which is the percentage of the civilian noninstitutional population who participated in the labor force by either having a job during the month or actively seeking one, was 62.8 percent in November which matches the percentage since March 1978.

In November, according to BLS, the nation’s civilian noninstitutional population, consisting of all people 16 or older who were not in the military or an institution, reached 248,844,000. Of those, 156,397,000 participated in the labor force by either holding a job or actively seeking one.

The 156,397,000 who participated in the labor force was 62.8 percent of the 248,844,000 civilian noninsttutional population, which matches the 62.8 percent rate in April, May, June, August and October of 2014 as well as the participation rate in March of 1978. The participation rate hit its lowest level of 62.7 percent in September 2014.

Another 92,447,000 people did not participate in the labor force. These Americans did not have a job and were not actively trying to find one. When President Obama took office in January 2009, there were 80,529,000 Americans who were not participating in the office, which means that since then, 11,918,000 Americans have left the workforce.
 
Pffft.

You can't focus on minutiae like the actual number of people working vs not working when you consider unemployment.

The administration's policies has freed up millions of people to write, to paint watercolors, and to improve their skills with archiving internet porn.
 
Pffft.

You can't focus on minutiae like the actual number of people working vs not working when you consider unemployment.

The administration's policies has freed up millions of people to write, to paint watercolors, and to improve their skills with archiving internet porn.

Are you fucking retarded? Hobbies don't pay off deficit.
 
Back
Top