SEVERUSMAX
Benevolent Master
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2004
- Posts
- 28,995
In your view, if one is doing a celebrity, is it best to pick one that you know next to nothing about, or better to do something about someone that you know at least a little?
The former carries the pitfalls that you might write something WAY off track, I mean ridiculous, almost satire and parody level of goofiness. Say, for instance, you wrote a gang-bang story about N Sync in which Lance Bass fucked a girl in tandem with the others, not knowing that Lance Bass is gay as fuck (came out, so that's been established). Or, in the case of writing Reno, writing Allison Mack as a basically sweet, but kinky nerd who rebuilds the main character, when it turns out that she's now alleged to be involved in a sex-trafficking ring for a cult (she faces possibly 15 years in prison, apparently, for this).
The advantage, however, of writing about a celeb that you know next to nothing about is that one can be free from the popular gossip mill, expectations, preconceived notions, etc. There is a sense of emancipation about doing this. For instance, I know almost nothing about most current heartthrobs, so I could write them any way that occurs to me without preconceived ideas or biases about who or what they are.
Conversely, if you write about celebs that you know much about, you could very well avoid the pitfalls of such laughable goof-ups, but you also feel, perhaps, more constrained by what is rumored about them in tabloids and rumor rags, that sort of thing. It's the "Inside Edition" effect, if you will, constantly hearing whichever current TMZ or whatever host in your head, telling you, "Don't write that, Justin Bieber wouldn't really do that." That sort of thing.
Any thoughts on these issues and how you feel about them?
The former carries the pitfalls that you might write something WAY off track, I mean ridiculous, almost satire and parody level of goofiness. Say, for instance, you wrote a gang-bang story about N Sync in which Lance Bass fucked a girl in tandem with the others, not knowing that Lance Bass is gay as fuck (came out, so that's been established). Or, in the case of writing Reno, writing Allison Mack as a basically sweet, but kinky nerd who rebuilds the main character, when it turns out that she's now alleged to be involved in a sex-trafficking ring for a cult (she faces possibly 15 years in prison, apparently, for this).
The advantage, however, of writing about a celeb that you know next to nothing about is that one can be free from the popular gossip mill, expectations, preconceived notions, etc. There is a sense of emancipation about doing this. For instance, I know almost nothing about most current heartthrobs, so I could write them any way that occurs to me without preconceived ideas or biases about who or what they are.
Conversely, if you write about celebs that you know much about, you could very well avoid the pitfalls of such laughable goof-ups, but you also feel, perhaps, more constrained by what is rumored about them in tabloids and rumor rags, that sort of thing. It's the "Inside Edition" effect, if you will, constantly hearing whichever current TMZ or whatever host in your head, telling you, "Don't write that, Justin Bieber wouldn't really do that." That sort of thing.
Any thoughts on these issues and how you feel about them?