BotanyBoy
Fuck Your Safe Space
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2012
- Posts
- 52,256
Should a White legal immigrant have more rights than an Illegal Mexican Immigrant?
- Thread starter hashtag46
- Start date
They bring considerably more meaningful content than the OP did.
hashtag46
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2017
- Posts
- 3,694
Bullshit.
Greece has a high unemployment rate, and there are parts in Russia where people could barely make ends meet.
It's all about the colour of their skin. It's called racism.
True. What is your point?
To conservatives, yes; not to liberals. Have you not noticed liberals' willingness to accept white refugees from Syria?
4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
Yes, he takes himself very seriously. However, there is not a political subject that his team doesn't see an element of color in it. For example, using the mentality of the typical SJW, those French and Russians would benefit from their white privilege at the expense of Mexicans/Hispanics, who are all brown unless they shoot a black kid in self-defense at which point they become 'white' Hispanics...
hashtag46
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2017
- Posts
- 3,694
Yes, he takes himself very seriously. There is not a political subject that his team doesn't see an element of color in it. For example, using the mentality of the typical SJW, those French and Russians would benefit from their white privilege at the expense of Mexicans/Hispanics, who are all brown unless they shoot a black kid in self-defense at which point they become 'white' Hispanics...
Most liberals that I met here in Australia and Nz were driven by a desire to reduce discrimination against minority groups, and they felt no need to attack white australians. They were looking for cooperation and harmony.
KingOrfeo and a few like him in this forum are driven by an anti- "privileged" white sentiment, more than by the desire to help minority groups. 90% of their posts are about upping the ante and "racists hunting" of whites. Instead of coming up with more constructive suggestions re ways of diminishing conflict and increasing harmony between groups.
Similarly, feminists appreciate men and try to enlist their help in advocating for abused or oppressed women. Whereas radical feminists are primarily driven by their hatred of most men.
Last edited:
Such as?
IME, when Liticons comment on such things they usually recommend nonsense like abolishing Black History Month, on the theory that calling attention to racism perpetuates it.
4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
That's how it used to be here too, but Social Justice movements never claim victory. People are too personally vested in the movement and the fight defines them and gives them self-esteem and a sense of pride and accomplishment. Thus the more successful they are in raising awareness and elevating their (unassailable) victims, the more intense their focus must be on injustice and soon turns to those who were not part of their fight even though they have harmed no one. The search for racism, injustice and white privilege knows no end...
Doin' right's got no end.
Cap'n Redlegs Terrill
hashtag46
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2017
- Posts
- 3,694
Such as?
IME, when Liticons comment on such things they usually recommend nonsense like abolishing Black History Month, on the theory that calling attention to racism perpetuates it.
Well, I don't do things like that yet I got the same smug and completely unrelated to what I was talking "if you oppose illegal immigration from South of the border, you're a racist'.
Not everyone who does is necessarily a racist, but most American opposition to Latino immigration is rooted in racism, and not in respect for the law. And that is not "completely unrelated" to your OP, which is nothing but a feeble and pathetic effort to stand that on its head and charge liberals with anti-white racism.
hashtag46
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2017
- Posts
- 3,694
Wow.
You have such a high opinion of your co-nationals. Just like your friends who claim that the majority of those who voted for Trump (aka half the country) did it because "they're racists".
When in reality, a lot of those who voted for Trump did it because Hillary was such a poor option, And because they were hoping for change as in a less corporatist party.
That they might have possibly made an error in judgment, that's another story and time will tell.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 56,312
Mostly on the law, national security, and cultural preferences. We have the right to decide all three.
Well? Not all of them necessarily are, but not even you could think of denying that white racism played a key role in his victory.
In this context, "cultural" is usually a transparent euphemism; what you hold against a Mexican, you would not hold against a Spaniard.
hashtag46
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2017
- Posts
- 3,694
Nope. Some of them were indeed racists, but most of them voted for economic reasons.
Read Mark Blyth. He knows better than you do.
hashtag46
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2017
- Posts
- 3,694
Parminderjeet
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2017
- Posts
- 518
If they are legal they can't be deported you brainless idiot.
hashtag46
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2017
- Posts
- 3,694
Have you washed your feet today, Rob?
Tjose fungi on your toenails didn't grow because of soap and water.
He would call Trump's campaign an "anti-establishment" movement and draw parallels with Brexit, but I doubt he would seriously argue that Trumpism could be disentangled from racism. If he has, please link the cite.
hashtag46
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2017
- Posts
- 3,694
Nice deflection.
He definitely agreed that Trump's campaign was racist.
And that a % voted for him because of his racist campaign.
But he believes that most of those who voted for him voted for economic reasons and a desire to avoid electing a crooked candidate like Hillary. Despite his racist rhetoric.
Last edited:
You keep using that word. It does not mean what you think it does.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 56,312
Let's be blunt. We don't want an uncontrolled movement of Mexico's problems into the United States so they can manifest themselves here. We should punish the Mexican government for its shamelessly engineered exportation of its undesirable human wreckage into the United States. We have a right to determine and maintain our own culture. We should turn those people around and tell them to fight to change their own country.
A society's problems generally do not follow its emigrants. The Irish brought no potato famine to America, the worst problem they brought was Catholicism, and the rest of us got used to it eventually.
They are not undesirable human wreckage, they're just people willing to do hard manual labor on the cheap. And the Mexican government did not send them here, they decided to come here on their own.That would be impossible. Our culture is always changing, and not always in directions we have collectively agreed upon.
Are you going to tell Cubans the same?
And what does "change their own country" even mean? Mexico's problems have no obvious solutions anyway. At least, none within their control; we could solve a lot of their problems by legalizing marijuana and cocaine, thereby putting the Mexican drug cartels out of business.
Last edited:
Similar threads
