Bad Day For D.C. Gun Controllers

Bullshit! There's no educating the true believer.

Sanger would be oh-so-pleased with her mating habits, wouldn't she? I could go along with BBS waffling with a "Yes, but....it evolved to something else."

But. To have NO IDEA what that woman's main impetus was is really something, considering. Don't you think?

Shaking my head.
 
I have yet to see you explain your thinking on any given subject. So there's that.

Because you don't read anyone's posts. I've never needed to ask anyone to explain my thinking to me.

I'm guessing this is something you and Vette don't want to talk about.
 
Because you don't read anyone's posts. I've never needed to ask anyone to explain my thinking to me.

I'm guessing this is something you and Vette don't want to talk about.

#AscriptionAgain
 
Because you don't read anyone's posts. I've never needed to ask anyone to explain my thinking to me.

I'm guessing this is something you and Vette don't want to talk about.

No, it isn't. I never assigned you a position. See, you don't read posts.

You might want to start the project of reading for understanding with your own posts.

You assigned both Vette and I the position of "not wanting to talk about it."

Just because time and time again I can accurately discern your positions that you rarely state outright does not mean I don't read them. It means I do. I couldn't possible do that (even inaccurately) without reading them.

Why do you seem to have such a problem with just clearly stating your positions on issues instead of implying them through your "20 questions" schtick?
 
You might want to start the project of reading for understanding with your own posts.

You assigned both Vette and I the position of "not wanting to talk about it."

Just because time and time again I can accurately discern your positions that you rarely state outright does not mean I don't read them. It means I do. I couldn't possible do that (even inaccurately) without reading them.

Why do you seem to have such a problem with just clearly stating your positions on issues instead of implying them through your "20 questions" schtick?

You just did it again. It's like bad comedy.

I haven't asked you any questions. Again, you don't actually read posts. You just proved my point three times in a row and still haven't addressed the topic. If you don't want to address the topic, that's fine, at least be honest enough to say that.
 
Back to the thread. D.C. has asked the court for a stay while they "consider" an appeal. Hope the court tells them no.

Heller controls, and the governments interest in disarming the law abiding is a FAR less compelling interest then allowing people to defend themselves now.
 
BBS is totally blind to the true motives of Sanger. I just posted in that old thread to highlight some points to help her out, but I'm not holding my breath.

dude, you're completely blind to anything your masters dont tell you what to think about Sanger

the only point you showed me in that thread, is your pointy little head
 
You just did it again. It's like bad comedy.

I haven't asked you any questions. Again, you don't actually read posts. You just proved my point three times in a row and still haven't addressed the topic. If you don't want to address the topic, that's fine, at least be honest enough to say that.

#AcriptionAgain

Knowing from experience your style of "discussion' and deciding that you are not worth engaging on any topic is not the same as not wanting to address a topic.

"I would be interested in hearing about...."

Is an interrogative, dunce.

Interrogative: question or query.

Not all interrogatives end in a question mark, dunce.
 
It was you who attacked my post in the first place, but after a wall of text and a lot of farting and crying, never succeeded in refuting my post, or Sanger's own words.:rolleyes:

like what? that Sanger was a socialist

that she wanted people to have control over thier birth control?

yeah, I didnt refute that

nor did Irefute that she was a supporter of eugenics.. because she was..

she also denounced Nazi eugenics... which you claim she didnt.. so you refuted yourself

you also claimed she wanted to exterminate the black community..which was not only refuted again.. but was shown to be a flat out lie, again

seriously, how much of a spanking do you want?
 
You're an idiot. I just posted in that old thread...for your edification.

So she is following you around to pick a fight to defend (now) Sanger's later in life alleged repudiation of eugenics.

Before she wouldn't admit Sanger had a fondness for eugenics.

I generally eschew all discussion on the subject because to take a Pro-abortion stance requires being dismissive of human life in general and there really isn't any arguing with a person who comes from that position with pride.

It is just weird to me as a father. From the time you find out your wife is pregnant you start thinking fondly about your child. Every little possible negative medical sign cause dread, Every positive experience like a kick or the little hand wave in the ultrasound are sources of joy.

Do abortion fans just wait until gestation is complete to start loving their child?
 
Back
Top