Shankara20
Well, that is lovely
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2005
- Posts
- 58,464
thank you - I try to please a very demanding audiencecallinectes said:Thanks for the welcome. very nice panties BTW!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
thank you - I try to please a very demanding audiencecallinectes said:Thanks for the welcome. very nice panties BTW!
For the life of me I really don't understand the urge to write an insulting rant about something one does not understand.@}-}rebecca---- said:For the life of me I really don't understand this form of play. There are cliched aspects of it that might appeal at times like sitting on a Dominants lap more often than not but the rest of it doesn't seem very service orientated to me. Sounds like an ongoing barter between the Dominant and willful child. How does general conversation work within this context if the submissive and partner inisist on infantalising her position in the relationship. Or is it a match of wills ranging from attempted ongoing topping to final submission or worse yet reward. I have seen conversations between vanilla couples that border on this in public and its been very difficult not to laugh at times. Especially seeing as it always appears overt and loudly portrayed.
Pleaseeeeeeeeee see my first line
Yes I am aware thats a rant .
Nice post, Shankara.Shankara said:welcome - well stated
I hope you find it safe here and continue to contribute.
JMohegan said:For the life of me I really don't understand the urge to write an insulting rant about something one does not understand.
http://www.vanilla-not.com/basics/daddydom.html@}-}rebecca---- said:I said both that I didn't understand John and also that my perception was based only on cliches. I also pointedly alluded to having only experienced anything of the apparent cliched genre in vanilla situations .I intend on furthering my knowledge of the topic.
Kajira Callista said:http://www.vanilla-not.com/basics/daddydom.html
gotta turn off my google filter. i will be back with more.
btw your friend shankara seems extremely knowledgeable on the subject
Kajira Callista said:http://www.vanilla-not.com/basics/daddydom.html
gotta turn off my google filter. i will be back with more.
btw your friend shankara seems extremely knowledgeable on the subject
Shankara20 said:*pat on head*
thats a good girl...
I would hate to have to discipline such a pretty girl...
graceanne said:liar
I'm not sure where I posted it, but this definately brings to mind my feeling on calling someone 'daddy' when I first came, which was YICK. Now I've been known to call Betticus daddy, and I believe I recently called Shank daddy, once. I still wouldn't call K daddy, that still gets my yick factor. But it's interesting to see me go from NEVER, to using as a term of affection. lol
Shankara20 said:Daddy Betticus hmmmmm? yum yum
bad Shank, bad bad bad........
Yes, that is precisely right. That's why it's Daddy/girl and not Daddy/daughter. It's not about incest at all. You have hit the nail on the head about Daddy/girl relationships, that is exactly correct.CutieMouse said:I've always thought it was more of a mature, older, experienced gentleman who cherishes his partner and nurtures her [or his] growth to become all that he knows s/he is, but she doesn't necessarily see in herself [or himself]. The relationship is still power based, kink on and all that, but the psycholog or umm... energy, supporting things is maybe a bit softer and more nurturing than one might find in a more traditional or presumably typical Master/slave sort of relationship.
Etoile said:Yes, that is precisely right. That's why it's Daddy/girl and not Daddy/daughter. It's not about incest at all. You have hit the nail on the head about Daddy/girl relationships, that is exactly correct.
*wild applause*
Okay, let me try to break it down based on what you've said. I think you're assuming too much infantilization here. I'm not sure where you got the idea about sitting in somebody's lap is part of Daddy/girl relationships, because I would say it really isn't. It might be part of D/g play, but that's just sceneing...sitting in the lap isn't something that really goes on automatically in all D/g relationships!@}-}rebecca---- said:For the life of me I really don't understand this form of play. There are cliched aspects of it that might appeal at times like sitting on a Dominants lap more often than not but the rest of it doesn't seem very service orientated to me. Sounds like an ongoing barter between the Dominant and willful child. How does general conversation work within this context if the submissive and partner inisist on infantalising her position in the relationship. Or is it a match of wills ranging from attempted ongoing topping to final submission or worse yet reward. I have seen conversations between vanilla couples that border on this in public and its been very difficult not to laugh at times. Especially seeing as it always appears overt and loudly portrayed.
JMohegan said:I am not a Daddy Dom, but I would like to welcome callinectes as well.
JMohegan said:For the life of me I really don't understand the urge to write an insulting rant about something one does not understand.
You are quite welcome.callinectes said:Thanks so much!
I think you mean the articles KC posted, yes?shy slave said:I read the articles that Etoile posted and however much I try I can't move past the word 'daddy.'
I am aware that in some parts of the States the word Daddy is used my his children for their whole life.
In the UK it is a word used by very young children only. Once they are about 7 years old it falls by the wayside and is replaced by 'Dad.'
I can't help but wonder if that is why it has such an ick factor for me, and the articles posted by Etoile did not resonant with me either.
In my culture the word 'Daddy' has associations with young children only.
Add in to that my dislike of role play and Daddy/girl play and Daddy/girl scenes start to merge. Whether they do in anyone else's head is not the issue.
As we have all said ad nauseam, labels are only what you make them. But if I had read a profile about Daddy Doms, I would have moved on depite his definition.
Its the actual word 'Daddy' thats the problem.