Texas 3D Gun Company Owner Paid Underage Girl for Sex

Boxlicker101 said:

Another thing you might be able to do is to marry the girl before having sex, but that's what you're trying to avoid. Maybe the only sure way to be safe is to hang out at retirement homes and fuck the old women there.

Women might have the same problem, but they rarely get more than the proverbial slap on the wrist for fooling around with underage boys. It amounts to something like ten years for men compared to 30 days for women.

Click to expand...

Boxlicker101 said:

Another thing you might be able to do is to marry the girl before having sex, but that's what you're trying to avoid. Maybe the only sure way to be safe is to hang out at retirement homes and fuck the old women there.

Click to expand...

Texas Penal Code said:

Sec. 21.11. INDECENCY WITH A CHILD.
(a) A person commits an offense if, with a child younger than 17 years of age, whether the child is of the same or opposite sex and regardless of whether the person knows the age of the child at the time of the offense, the person:
(1) engages in sexual contact with the child or causes the child to engage in sexual contact; or
(2) with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person:
(A) exposes the person's anus or any part of the person's genitals, knowing the child is present; or
(B) causes the child to expose the child's anus or any part of the child's genitals.
(b) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the actor:
(1) was not more than three years older than the victim and of the opposite sex;
(2) did not use duress, force, or a threat against the victim at the time of the offense; and
(3) at the time of the offense:
(A) was not required under Chapter 62, Code of Criminal Procedure, to register for life as a sex offender; or
(B) was not a person who under Chapter 62 had a reportable conviction or adjudication for an offense under this section.
(b-1) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the actor was the spouse of the child at the time of the offense.
(c) In this section, "sexual contact" means the following acts, if committed with the intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person:
(1) any touching by a person, including touching through clothing, of the anus, breast, or any part of the genitals of a child; or
(2) any touching of any part of the body of a child, including touching through clothing, with the anus, breast, or any part of the genitals of a person.
(d) An offense under Subsection (a)(1) is a felony of the second degree and an offense under Subsection (a)(2) is a felony of the third degree.

Click to expand...

Rightguide said:

When little boys get fucked by their female teachers it's assumed they got lucky.

Click to expand...

Oblimo said:

Wrong again, at least in Texas, you stupid ass.

Read Texas Penal Code - PENAL § 21.12. Improper Relationship Between Educator and Student and learn something.

Click to expand...

Rightguide said:

Along with no brain or experience, you have no sense of humor either. Pitiful.

Click to expand...

PrickNose said:

Bullshit, you meant it. You've said similar in the past and obviously meant it. Why you gotta be such a bitch all the time?

Click to expand...

BotanyBoy said:

Clearly.

...

The statutory though? The instructions vs. the law vs. the case = he fucked an underage girl...despite hearing about her deceptions, that we were supposed to disregard but clearly didn't once deliberations started, the fact remained a 22 year old guy put his dick in a 17 year old girl and got caught....so it was statutory rape and he went to prison.

Click to expand...

Oblimo said:

Ah! This is actually a fascinating topic.

Statutory rape is one of the very few crimes in the US with “strict liability.”

With a strict liability crime, there is one, and only one, defense: I did not in fact do the criminal act in question.

So, the only defense available to Wilson is if he did not actually have sex with her, or he did have sex with her, but she was in fact not underage at the time he had sex with her.

She lied about her age? Doesn’t matter, he’s guilty.

She showed him a fake driver’s license that said she was 20? Doesn’t matter, he’s guilty.

She lied about her age, showed him a fake drivers license to prove it, looks 30 years old, went to his house uninvited, got his ass drunk, leapt upon him and rode him reverse cowgirl style?

Doesn’t matter. He is still guilty.

Strict liability. Gotta love it.

Click to expand...

Oblimo said:

Wrong again, at least in Texas, you stupid ass.

Read Texas Penal Code - PENAL § 21.12. Improper Relationship Between Educator and Student and learn something.

Click to expand...

Mello_SixtyNine said:

The idea that you are totally screwed legally, even if the underaged party completely lies about her age is pretty fucked up...and bordering on terrifying.

Hypothetical Scenario: What if the 16-year-old girl pulled a gun on the guy, handcuffed him to a chair, and then fucked him cowgirl style...could he still be charged with statutory rape even though she technically raped him?

On another note: Didn't Rob Lowe make a threesome sextape in the 90s with one of the girl's being 16? If there is strict liability, why isn't he in prison?

Click to expand...

Boxlicker101 said:

When teenage boys get fucked by their female teachers, other boys consider their cohorts as having gotten lucky. The legal authorities might not see it that way, but the other boys do.

Click to expand...

Boxlicker101 said:

They were in GA at the time, and the age of consent is 16 there. https://perezhilton.com/2016-08-31-rob-lowe-sex-tape-comedy-central-roast-video/

Click to expand...

Oblimo said:

Well, that’s certainly the stereotype, and I can easily see that being true, but do you have any actual evidence this is true, annecdotal or otherwise? Not challenge the truth of it, just seeing if there’s anything other than VanHalen’s Hot for Teacher music video backing up the reality of it.

But I was talking to RightGuide, who did not seem to be speaking for young teenage boys.

Click to expand...

Sy_Snootles said:

He was Charlie Sheen before it was cool.

Click to expand...

Mello_SixtyNine said:

The idea that you are totally screwed legally, even if the underaged party completely lies about her age is pretty fucked up...and bordering on terrifying.

Click to expand...

Hypothetical Scenario: What if the 16-year-old girl pulled a gun on the guy, handcuffed him to a chair, and then fucked him cowgirl style...could he still be charged with statutory rape even though she technically raped him?

Click to expand...

On another note: Didn't Rob Lowe make a threesome sextape in the 90s with one of the girl's being 16? If there is strict liability, why isn't he in prison?

Click to expand...

Rightguide said:

Look at the emotes at the end of the sentence, dummy.

Click to expand...

Boxlicker101 said:

There would be no way to prove boys would have that attitude, but I used to be a tee-age boy, and that was the way I and my contemporaries felt.

Click to expand...

Rotadom said:

Being wrong is forgivable, being an insufferable assbag is not.

Click to expand...

Oblimo said:

Yup, and I think that’s the reason why it was made a strict liability crime in Middle freakin’ Ages: Western society, really, really, really doesn’t want you to impregnate underaged girls outside of wedlock.



Very most likely. Here’s an Indiana Law Journal article directly on point, including example cases, arguing that it’s time to revise statutory rape. I’ve only skimmed it, so I don’t know its quality.



Because he entered a plea bargain for 20 hours of community service.

No, really.

Click to expand...

Oblimo said:

I remember when “asshat” was new...

Is it possible to have nostalgia for the present in way that isn’t symptomatic of senility? Beyond mono no aware (物の哀れ), I mean.

Click to expand...

Mello_SixtyNine said:

What about that Traci Lords thing? I think she was 15 at the time and I believe that most of her scenes were shot in California. Tom Byron and a lot of other dudes would be in prison.

Click to expand...

Sy_Snootles said:

It is unlikely that she is worth 500. At that age they barely know how to fuck.
I like the ones that have been legal for a few decades. They've been fucked every way to Sunday and back again and know how it's done.
Not that there isn't something to be said for LEGAL but young pussy. Gotta stress the legal there. Most of the pics on my rape wall are of ones in their 20's. Hot, tight, got some fight in 'em but not too much cuz they're still young enough to think it's all gonna be ok and I'll let them go when I'm done.

Click to expand...

adrina said:

Rape wall. What a delightful turn of phrase.

Click to expand...