People of Color Win Under Republicans!

That's something a racist right wing snowflake would say.

Except it's not racist at all and doesn't have anything to do with racism.....FAIL.

If it did there wouldn't be any of the black millionaire/billionaires or top professionals and politicians that we see in our society today.

It matters plenty and is extremely relevant to those of us who aren't huge racists.

Yes I know the left claims anyone who doesn't support socialism is racist, but that's verifiable bullshit.

Racism has nothing to do with it.

If you think it does then point out the racist policy that's preventing people of color from making money.

85323383.jpg
 
Last edited:
You're just another tool of the Fox Sewer, hate to tell you.

How so?

They generally dislike and condemn folks with my political beliefs.

Or are you just talking shit again hoping something sticks?

I'm a radical lefty lmao.

You seem to support left wing policy and condemn liberty and equality in the name of egalitarianism at every turn.

You're openly anti 1A, 2A, 4A, 10A, 14A rights at a bare minimum......you're pro state control over the means of production and distribution of goods and services, pro welfare and social services, anti capitalist.

I haven't seen a single shred of support for liberty from you.

Am I wrong?? Were you a free market capitalist and strong supporter of individual rights this whole time??? :confused: You could have been totally lying about all your support for (D)'s, social services, welfare and government regulations over commerce.

But I don't think you were.
 
The only thing that's true is that I am totally anti-2A. But I wouldn't say that if I were running for office. It's my personal opinion.

Otherwise, you have spun the mere fact that I supported Hillary and Obama into a fantasy that suits your insane, maniacal hatred of Democrats.


How so?

They generally dislike and condemn folks with my political beliefs.

Or are you just talking shit again hoping something sticks?



You seem to support left wing policy and condemn liberty and equality in the name of egalitarianism at every turn.

You're openly anti 1A, 2A, 4A, 10A, 14A rights at a bare minimum......you're pro state control over the means of production and distribution of goods and services, pro welfare and social services, anti capitalist.

I haven't seen a single shred of support for liberty from you.

Am I wrong?? Were you a free market capitalist and strong supporter of individual rights this whole time??? :confused: You could have been totally lying about all your support for (D)'s, social services, welfare and government regulations over commerce.

But I don't think you were.
 
Ah, I see that BotanyBoy's tantrum over his own statement being quoted is continuing into day two.
 
The only thing that's true is that I am totally anti-2A.

Oh so you didn't support AntiFa's position on banning "hate" speech??(1A)

Because I'm pretty sure you did.

And you favored privacy when it comes to abortions but not business. (4A and 14A)

Or federal supremacy over states over the same topic among many others. (10A)

And progressive taxation over fair taxation. (14A)

Otherwise, you have spun the mere fact that I supported Hillary and Obama into a fantasy that suits your insane, maniacal hatred of Democrats.

Nope....using your own positions stated while supporting them against you.

The fact that you think those things, your advocacy for government control over the means of production and distribution of goods and services, is of a liberal nature is the only insane thing here.
 
What a bunch of bull. "Antifa" does not have a position. They're not interviewed on camera. No one even knows who they are.

As for privacy, that's your position as well. You support abortion privacy rights AND you support regulation of "business." ("Business should proceed unhampered unless it impedes the public health" or something to that effect = they can't do whatever the fuck they want.)

I have no recollection of a federal/state argument and no blanket position--depends on the issue.

Right. Like I'm going to agree with your use of the word "fair."

You have cobbled together a bunch of unsupported fantasies of what you imagine/wish I stand for as if it's gospel truth, only because it's what you want to believe.

"My advocacy for government control over the means of production and distribution of goods and services." Sounds like you're picking some socialist-sounding stance out of your mush brain and trying to slap it on my back.

You're just so desperate to validate your all-consuming hatred of the imaginary fantasy that makes you get up in the morning, just like Ann Coulter.

Oh so you didn't support AntiFa's position on banning "hate" speech??(1A)

Because I'm pretty sure you did.

And you favored privacy when it comes to abortions but not business. (4A and 14A)

Or federal supremacy over states over the same topic among many others. (10A)

And progressive taxation over fair taxation. (14A)



Nope....using your own positions stated while supporting them against you.

The fact that you think those things, your advocacy for government control over the means of production and distribution of goods and services, is of a liberal nature is the only insane thing here.
 
Last edited:
What a bunch of bull.

So do you or do you not support regulation against "hate" or "offensive" speech?

You're ok with racial supremacy groups spouting off their hate speech??


As for privacy, that's your position as well.

No it's not.

Right. Like I'm going to agree with your use of the word "fair."

Fair would be treating everyone exactly the same under the law no??

"My advocacy for government control over the means of production and distribution of goods and services." Sounds like you're picking some socialist-sounding stance out of your mush brain and trying to slap it on my back.

Really? So you don't support Obamacare because you're ideologically opposed to government control over the distribution of goods and services right??

:D
 
I already did.

Bullshit that's why you won't link anything other than irrelevant SJW drivel.

Go in and pull the quote out that identifies the racist policy that's preventing POC from making all the money they want just like all the billionaire POC that are currently doing exactly that.

Newsflash...you wont because you can't.

Cu7MF9n.gif
 
I support Antifa.

I don't support the militant outsider aspect of Antifa (is that BotanyBoy and his doctrinaire ilk gasping?). I live in Charlottesville, I was there on August 12th. The outside Antifa agitators have a full part in the violence that ensued.
 
Gee I don't know Senator McCarthy, let me consult my legal representation.

Are you a commie, or a citizen?

eec7f6c8f329d6f419908ff60fab189c--propaganda-art-cold-war-propaganda.jpg


2439695420_e9a8a6f6c9_b.jpg


Obama_Hammer_Sickle.gif



So do you or do you not support regulation against "hate" or "offensive" speech?

You're ok with racial supremacy groups spouting off their hate speech??




No it's not.



Fair would be treating everyone exactly the same under the law no??



Really? So you don't support Obamacare because you're ideologically opposed to government control over the distribution of goods and services right??

:D
 
Gee I don't know Senator McCarthy, let me consult my legal representation.

Yea I didn't think you would honestly or directly answer any of those questions....;)


Can't even own up to the things you regularly advocate here on these boards.
 
Care to elaborate or is this you just swinging in the dark again? :rolleyes:

What's to elaborate? The rightists chose to come to town armed and staged an illegal march through the University the night before (and should have been chased out of town then), but the day of their legally permitted gathering in then Lee Park, they were within their rights to have their gathering--as long as it remained peaceful and contained to where they had a permit to hold it. Their access to the park was denied by protestors, including outside agitators who had no more reason to be in Charlottesville that day than the rightists did--and they had less legal reason to be at that park. The resulting violence came from both sides. I don't see that any more elaboration is needed than that. Those who wanted this to be a violent confrontation came from the outside--from both sides.

I'll leave the darkness here to you and your ilk.
 
Last edited:
What's to elaborate?

What did you mean in the post I quoted and questioned you about....this one.

Lest anyone forgets what sort of person you project as on this discussion board.

What sort of person do I project as exactly??:confused:





That has NOTHING to do with any of the shit in the rest of this post.

The resulting violence came from both sides.

I agree.

I'll leave the darkness here to you and your ilk.

Liberals ain't the dark ones here bubba....that's the SJW/socialists and the fanatical "conservatives" who are just theocratic whack jobs of the RW.
 
Last edited:
What's to elaborate? The rightists chose to come to town armed and staged an illegal march through the University the night before (and should have been chased out of town then), but the day of their legally permitted gathering in then Lee Park, they were within their rights to have their gathering--as long as it remained peaceful and contained to where they had a permit to hold it. Their access to the park was denied by protestors, including outside agitators who had no more reason to be in Charlottesville that day than the rightists did--and they had less legal reason to be at that park. The resulting violence came from both sides. I don't see that any more elaboration is needed than that. Those who wanted this to be a violent confrontation came from the outside--from both sides.

I'll leave the darkness here to you and your ilk.

This is essentially what I have been saying for almost a year. But why was the march through the U. illegal? You might also add that when the access to the park was denied, it was a violation of their Constitutional rights and that those who did the denying were also armed, and that they attacked the persons who were there legally. I have no use for either of the groups who were involved, but only one of them was acting within the law.
 
This is essentially what I have been saying for almost a year. But why was the march through the U. illegal? You might also add that when the access to the park was denied, it was a violation of their Constitutional rights and that those who did the denying were also armed, and that they attacked the persons who were there legally. I have no use for either of the groups who were involved, but only one of them was acting within the law.

No guns on campus (this isn't Florida or Texas) and no nonapproved demonstrations on campus. They could also be gotten (and some have been) for defacing property during the nonpermitted demonstration by nonstudents. There have been prosecutions and agreements signed by at least three of the groups that they won't return to Charlottesville armed in exchange for charges against the organizations (all three supposed "militias" from the northeast) being dropped.
 
Because your McCarthy style interrogation is ridiculous.

If I were a "socialist" I have every right to be so. I'm an American and it's not the 1950s you freak.

You really have your priorities massively screwed up. You don't seem to comprehend the fact that I'm not running the country. If I hold all these beliefs you consider "degenerate" (nice Nazi term, btw) so fucking what? Am I President? No.

Why are you more obsessed with us "lefties" than with what's going on with our actual leaders? Why is it SO much more important what I think or Keith thinks than what the actual President is doing? Have you heard what's going on with the Postmaster General, Trump and Amazon? Of course not.

You exemplify the point of the book I mentioned. Your sole purpose in life is to go to war against "the left," nothing more. You're just a tool.


Yea I didn't think you would honestly or directly answer any of those questions....;)


Can't even own up to the things you regularly advocate here on these boards.
 
Because your McCarthy style interrogation is ridiculous.

It's not an interrogation......if getting you to own up to your political beliefs in an honest manner seems like an interrogation then maybe you should re-examine those beliefs. ;)

If I were a "socialist" I have every right to be so.

Never said you didn't.

If?? LOL You very clearly are highly in favor of a large number of socialistic policies/positions....stop being so ashamed. It's really trendy to hate pretty much all the core principals and ideals the USA was founded upon.

Why are you more obsessed with us "lefties" than with what's going on with our actual leaders?

Because we don't have actual leaders anymore.

All politics are local and I'm totally opposed to the social and economic oppression you advocate. :)

You exemplify the point of the book I mentioned. Your sole purpose in life is to go to war against "the left," nothing more. You're just a tool.

Naaaah...just an idle hobby, my primary purpose is to make a shit load of money so I can buy awesome new shit or make more money with it.

ohhhh and finish it with name calling, that really solidifies your post as rational and well put together. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top