COVID-19 RESOURCES
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

38 states now have criminal laws against feticide

coachdb18

coachdb18

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Posts
9,366
http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/fetal-homicide-state-laws.aspx

Referred to as 'feticide'.

National Conference of State Legislatures said:
The debate over fetal rights is not new to the legislative arena. Every year pro-life and pro-choice advocates vie for the upper hand in this contentious issue. In recent years, states have expanded this debate to include the issue of fetuses killed by violent acts against pregnant women. In some states, legislation has increased the criminal penalties for crimes involving pregnant women. These laws have focused on the harm done to a pregnant woman and the subsequent loss of her pregnancy, but not on the rights of the fetus.

Currently, at least 38 states have fetal homicide laws. The states include: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia;and>Wisconsin>. At least 23 states have fetal homicide laws that apply to the earliest stages of pregnancy ("any state of gestation," "conception," "fertilization" or "post-fertilization");
Click to expand...

The link has references to the individual state laws for feticide.
 
kang-kodos-2016-abortions-for-some-miniature-american-flags-for-others.jpg
 
Mention that pregnant women getting killed is two murders, and the clown posse shows up to celebrate? What a bunch of truly sick fuckers!
 
These laws have focused on the harm done to a pregnant woman and the subsequent loss of her pregnancy, but not on the rights of the fetus.
Click to expand...

Sigh. Way to twist the intent of the law. It is so the woman - who wanted to carry to term to have a baby - has legal recourse. It's not about elevating the rights of the fetus above the rights of the woman. It's about giving the woman more legal rights and it treats the fetus as her possession - and giving compensation for that loss.

Christ you're an idiot.
 
We can look at each of the 38 states with laws against feticide, but I thought Georgia might be a start...

Ga. Code Ann. § 16-5-80 defines feticide. A person commits the offense of feticide if he or she willfully kills an unborn child so far developed as to be ordinarily called "quick" by causing any injury to the mother of such child. The penalty for feticide is imprisonment for life.
Ga. Code Ann. § 40-6-393.1 defines vehicular feticide and provides for penalties.
Ga. Code Ann. § 52-7-12.3 defines the term "unborn child"to mean a member of the species Homo sapiens at any stage of development who is carried in the womb. The law defines feticide by watercraft in the first and second degrees and provides for penalties.
Click to expand...
 
Oh look, the white supremacist who posted an ape picture of Michelle and Barack speaks again!

Wanna bet that this poster is against food stamp and WIC programs to help these children once they are out of the womb?

Or that he is one of the Deplorables who votes for politicians that want to take away or regulate oral contraceptives.

Repugs, all up in a woman's womb until the baby pops out and then it's to hell with them!

The GB repugs should be the last to speak on morality. They lack empathy and only wish to control people.
 
coachdb18 said:
Mention that pregnant women getting killed is two murders, and the clown posse shows up to celebrate? What a bunch of truly sick fuckers!
Click to expand...


Oh shut the fuck up, with your faux outrage.

You repugs are the main ones voting for politicians who wish to drop bombs on poor countries, impacting women and children.

You are one of the dumbest and fakest posters on here.

As I said, you sons of useless bitches only care about fetuses, but once they are out, you don't give a damn.
 
adrina said:
Sigh. Way to twist the intent of the law. It is so the woman - who wanted to carry to term to have a baby - has legal recourse. It's not about elevating the rights of the fetus above the rights of the woman. It's about giving the woman more legal rights and it treats the fetus as her possession - and giving compensation for that loss.

Christ you're an idiot.
Click to expand...

She is "compensated," how?

If the crime is assault on a woman with a loss of cells, why is that a life sentence? If you stab someone, and it results in the loss of their spleen you don't get life in prison.

nowisthetime said:
Oh shut the fuck up, with your faux outrage.

You repugs are the main ones voting for politicians who wish to drop bombs on poor countries, impacting women and children.

You are one of the dumbest and fakest posters on here.

As I said, you sons of useless bitches only care about fetuses, but once they are out, you don't give a damn.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure that most Republicans did not vote for the Nobel Prize recipient Barack Hussein Obama.
 
Que said:
She is "compensated," how?

If the crime is assault on a woman with a loss of cells, why is that a life sentence? If you stab someone, and it results in the loss of their spleen you don't get life in prison.
Click to expand...

Legal recourse. Mental midget.
 
Que said:
Legal recourse to do what?
Click to expand...

Legal recourse for the no longer pregnant woman to protect her property (her fetus) rights in the event of someone causing her to lose it because of violence perpetrated upon her - so the person that caused her to lose said wanted property (her fetus) can be punished by the law.

This isn't rocket science.
 
Que said:
She is "compensated," how?

If the crime is assault on a woman with a loss of cells, why is that a life sentence? If you stab someone, and it results in the loss of their spleen you don't get life in prison.



I'm pretty sure that most Republicans did not vote for the Nobel Prize recipient Barack Hussein Obama.
Click to expand...

Read in that reply that one of the liberals is now making the argument 'It's about giving the woman more legal rights and it treats the fetus as her possession - and giving compensation for that loss.'

Isn't that ever so supportive of my prior argument about slavery and the ownership of another human being? Are we going to be seeing the US government compensating the descendants of slave-owners now for the loss of their property?
 
Last edited:
adrina said:
...her property (her fetus) rights...
Click to expand...

Fucking CONTROL hungry socialist twat, no different than any other totally impotent, wannabe tyrant who's ever dictated that another human life is their "property" to beat over the head with a club and drag back to the cave, to enslave, to tortuously murder.
 
BobBalouski said:
Fucking CONTROL hungry socialist twat, no different than any other totally impotent, wannabe tyrant who's ever dictated that another human life is their "property" to beat over the head with a club and drag back to the cave, to enslave, to tortuously murder.
Click to expand...

Kinda like Col Nathan Jessup answering the question, ‘Did you order the code Red?’ with ‘You’re God damned right I did!’
 
Que said:
I'm pretty sure that most Republicans did not vote for the Nobel Prize recipient Barack Hussein Obama.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:
Do you refer to John McCain as John Sidney McCain?
Or to Mitt Romney as Willard Mitt Romney?
 
about_average said:
:rolleyes:
Do you refer to John McCain as John Sidney McCain?
Or to Mitt Romney as Willard Mitt Romney?
Click to expand...

Do you feel Barack Hussein Obama should be ashamed of his heritage?

Do you castigate people for using Drumpf instead of Trump?

No to John McCain because I never did know his middle name of my poor excuse for a Senator, yes to Willard because Willard was also a name of a good friend of mine. I routinely refer to Nixon as Richard Milhous Nixon. Actual presidents have often been known by their full names that is certainly the name that's always on their Presidential Library. I don't recall Ford's middle name but it's John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Ronald Wilson Reagan and James Earl Carter. Off the top of my head the only losing candidates that I can think of their middle names are Barry (Some people call him Maurice) Goldwater and Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Any other irrelevant questions?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rightguide
Yes Replacement Theory is A Figment Of Our Imagination
2
Replies
31
Views
542
Shaglus_Ziegler
Shaglus_Ziegler
Rotadom
Texas Companies Say Republicans Are Ruining Their Business
Replies
3
Views
93
RobDownSouth
RobDownSouth
BabyBoomer50s
Earnings growth in red states outpacing the blues
Replies
7
Views
218
YDB95
YDB95
bigsly
Blacks had no unalienable right to individual liberty
Replies
1
Views
327
FL30
F
DeluxAuto
Gun Violence Is Actually Worse in Red States. It’s Not Even Close
2
Replies
33
Views
725
dkovic77
D
Back
Top