LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
Unscrupulous feminists are getting their clocks cleaned in court for their abuse of this law.
Whatever the fuck people say about MRAs, MRAs gotta observe exactly one and only one rule:
mop the mother fucking floor with the radical feminists in court.
If you can do that, all the anti-MRA smack talk means jack monkey fucking squat.
http://www.legallyindia.com/2014070...lice-and-magistrates-for-lsquo-cavalier-rsquo
The Supreme Court yesterday laid down new directions making police officers and judicial magistrates liable for departmental action and contempt proceedings for making “scurrilous” arrests and ordering “routine” detention under Section 498A of the IPC or under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Justices CK Prasad and PK Ghose, allowing a man Arunesh Kumar’s criminal appeal for anticipatory bail under Section 498A, said that the new directions will apply not just to arrests and detention under Section 498A and Section 4, but also to any other penal provision for imprisonment up to seven years.
The bench used the “Crime in India 2012 Statistics” published by the National Crime Records Bureau of the Ministry for Home Affairs to point out:
“The fact that Section 498-A is a cognizable and non-bailable offence has lent it a dubious place of pride amongst the provisions that are used as weapons rather than shield by disgruntled wives. The simplest way to harass is to get the husband and his relatives arrested under this provision.”
Whatever the fuck people say about MRAs, MRAs gotta observe exactly one and only one rule:
mop the mother fucking floor with the radical feminists in court.
If you can do that, all the anti-MRA smack talk means jack monkey fucking squat.
http://www.legallyindia.com/2014070...lice-and-magistrates-for-lsquo-cavalier-rsquo
The Supreme Court yesterday laid down new directions making police officers and judicial magistrates liable for departmental action and contempt proceedings for making “scurrilous” arrests and ordering “routine” detention under Section 498A of the IPC or under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Justices CK Prasad and PK Ghose, allowing a man Arunesh Kumar’s criminal appeal for anticipatory bail under Section 498A, said that the new directions will apply not just to arrests and detention under Section 498A and Section 4, but also to any other penal provision for imprisonment up to seven years.
The bench used the “Crime in India 2012 Statistics” published by the National Crime Records Bureau of the Ministry for Home Affairs to point out:
“The fact that Section 498-A is a cognizable and non-bailable offence has lent it a dubious place of pride amongst the provisions that are used as weapons rather than shield by disgruntled wives. The simplest way to harass is to get the husband and his relatives arrested under this provision.”
