JackLuis
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Posts
- 21,855
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Arguing that Richard Nixon was not forced out of office by Democrats, but instead “as the 1974 midterms loomed and Republicans … presumably calculated that Nixon staying meant Republicans up for reelection in three months … would be going.”
“You think these Republicans are going to defend Donald Trump?” Olbermann asked, adding “there is no Republicans loyalty Trump now.”
Olbermann said once it becomes clear that Trump’s “insanity” can no longer be overlooked, it will be “Republicans who force him into the straight jacket.”
“it will be the Republicans who impeach him,” he added.
Isn't Keith a mouth piece puppet for the progressive fascists and the left wing communist? His reports are as funny as that guy Rachel's.
After seeing Olberman on TV, I consider him to be almost as big an asshole as Trump. And that's really going some.
It appears you have no idea what you are talking about. You must be a Trumpite?
I doubt there are any people who could be called "Trumpites" whatever that is. There are people who respect the truth and are averse to witch hunts, and I am one of them, but I have no use for Trump as a person. I have thought of him as an asshole for quite a while, and that is unlikely to change. As far as president goes, I said long ago we were likely to have the worst pair of candidates ever nominated by the manor parties, and I haven't changed my mind yet. I thought Hillary was worse, but only marginally so.
It's a bullshit article.If there are any here who find Olberman even remotely credible, I recommend this article as urgently needed therapy.
I agree, except for me it wasn't all that marginal. Given the choice between an embarrassing buffoon, and a person hell-bent on becoming the first female president to start a war with a nuclear superpower, I prefer the former (although I voted for Jill Stein, who has her own problems.) Plus, despite his overall grotesqueness, Trump has said a few things that surprised me, in a good way -- his endorsement of Hamiltonian economics, his promise of big infrastructure projects, and his promise to restore our commitment to manned space flight come to mind. I have no way of knowing at this point whether his words will be followed by deeds. But ironically, the policies I am citing are the things I used to like about the Democratic Party.I thought Hillary was worse, but only marginally so.
I agree, except for me it wasn't all that marginal. Given the choice between an embarrassing buffoon, and a person hell-bent on becoming the first female president to start a war with a nuclear superpower,
She certainly had. And I've got to admit, nothing says poise, dignity and class like someone gloating on national TV about sending crazed fundamentalist mercenaries to sodomize the leader of a sovereign state to death with a bayonet.Of all the candidates for president in the last twenty years, Hillary Clinton understood the limits and opportunities of the White House the best--because she'd been there.
She certainly had. And I've got to admit, nothing says poise, dignity and class like someone gloating on national TV about sending crazed fundamentalist mercenaries to sodomize the leader of a sovereign state to death with a bayonet.
And you participated in the unfruitful witch hunts against Hillary Clinton here on the forums, which makes you a liar and hypocrite on the scale of Trump. Own it.
You're being utterly ridiculous and brain washed. This is the state of extreme, unreasonable hate our country is in.
What was that hypocritical lie you posted to this thread just a few hours ago about being averse to witch hunts, Box?