Do you think Mueller should be fired?

Should Mueller be fired


  • Total voters
    109
I supported the endless non-investigations of Hillary and I support the endless investigation of Trump especially since it is putting an exclamation point on the former while turning up nothing of any great import on behalf of the latter. Mueller seems to be digging a huge mass grave for whom the bell tolls.

How do you know there's nothing of importance found? Does Mueller make a point of sharing his investigation with you and your bros sitting around Dennys drinking coffee?

There were many investigations into Hilary.. Nothing found. This investigation is ongoing. :rolleyes:
 
I supported the endless non-investigations of Hillary and I support the endless investigation of Trump especially since it is putting an exclamation point on the former while turning up nothing of any great import on behalf of the latter. Mueller seems to be digging a huge mass grave for whom the bell tolls.

Ha! How were they non-investigations? You’re going to hurt Trent’s feelings. Gowdy still has a raging boner for Clinton. He’s trying to come for her again.
 
Mueller seems to be digging a huge mass grave for whom the bell tolls.

I support a full scale R&D cleanout, roto-rooter style. Lots of past and present critters and above would go, including a couple of SCROTEs.

I'm not sure Wall Street could handle it though.
 
He has a well recognized conflict of interest.

In reality, he should, under legal canons, resign.

And what evidence is there to suggest Mueller and Comey are BFFs, exactly? Do they chill at each others cribs on a regular basis? No, neither have visited the others home. Comey succeeded Mueller as FBI director so obviously there is going to be a work related relationship, but do they hang out regularly outside of work? No, no one has shown that. Tell us about this conflict of interest please. I believe Mueller to be a stand up guy, who would resign if he felt he was unable to be impartial.
 
How do you know there's nothing of importance found? Does Mueller make a point of sharing his investigation with you and your bros sitting around Dennys drinking coffee?

The free WiFi at Denny's during big breakfast hours must be blowing up. :D
 
How do you know there's nothing of importance found? Does Mueller make a point of sharing his investigation with you and your bros sitting around Dennys drinking coffee?

There were many investigations into Hilary.. Nothing found. This investigation is ongoing. :rolleyes:

He and his bro Ishmael “know things.” Inside info, ya know?
 
Comshaw Quote:
HOWEVER, even though they (the majority Republican committee) found something, no one (including Hillary) was charged with anything. So are they part of the "Deep State" protecting her, or was there not enough of anything of consequence to charge her with? It's one or the other, choose wisely.
by BB:
Oh they found plenty...even the FBI said they busted her red handed but we all know elites don't have to follow the same rules. It was so BLATANTLY bad no less than 3 trials both military and civilian for the SAME shit tried using "but Hillary!" as a defense...every one of them is doing 10-35 years in Leavenworth right now.

It's not one of the other.

When this went down if you remember there was a WHOLE LOT of back door meetings, late night secret rendezvous with AG's and POTUS's on air strips and lots of sweetheart immunity deals being tossed around left and right and it was all the (D)'s could do to keep it under hat and despite their best efforts it looked BAD.

You remember that?

If she got off...that's it....it's over. Doesn't matter what the (R)'s find or have on it today, they can't touch her for it, they would have to find new shit on her.

She won.

So let me see if I can put your post into a bit clearer terms.
Even with 8 investigations, and all the foo fraa over the e-mail thing and the R's having a majority in both houses of congress the D's were able to protect Hillary and keep the R's from charging her for her nefarious actions? My my she is a super criminal master mind isn't see? Or should Occams Razor be applied? No matter your convoluted, deep state conspiracy theories, 99% of the time the simplest explanation is the correct one: That there wasn't anything chargeable found. Of course you have your opinion, but as I've said in the past opinion and fact are two very different things.

Additionally here's one of the points I made about slimy behavior in attributing things that were never said. Look at my post quoted above. Where did it say there was nothing found? I didn't. You added that to bolster your argument, then went on to layout a back handed deep state conspiracy theory, all the while trying to deny it is that. So it is one or the other and you chose the twisted, unsubstantiated, idiotic idea of a deep state conspiracy. A pig by any other name is still a hog.


Comshaw Quote:
And did I say that I'm Ok with what was found? Did I even imply that? Not at all. What I did do is draw a parallel between what Beco said here and what he has said in the past. Much like many who rabidly support one side or the other do.
BB:
No but based upon your fevered support for pretty much anything (D)+your comment I figured you might be, that's why I asked.

Admittedly I lean more Liberal then conservative, but as I've said in the past, I'm a centrist. I believe in the rule of law, facts and truth. To me it has to be proven with hard evidence, not built on a hollow house of opinion, theories and imagination.

This is another example of the behavior I pointed out. I "might be" doing something so you are positive I was doing just what you suspect me off. That's called an intellectual bias. You are sure I am what you think I am you don't need to read what I write with an open mind because you already know what is behind it. Let me quote one of your presidents more eloquent phrases: Sad.


Comshaw Quote:
Hillary was investigated, it's done. Whether or not you agree with the committee's conclusion is moot. But supporting all lines of investigation in one instance because there might be something to find and later trying to say another one should be limited to investigating only what the original charges were is hypocritical and logically inconsistent.


BB:
Clearly...because if I had my way she wouldn't be above the law.
And I agree with you on the rest of that.

Of course you would, even though this whole thing went down as the rule of law, you think you know better. That's the same mind set the folks in Germany had in the later 30's. When you start to substitute rabid feels for facts and the wishes of the mob for law it is a dangerous situation.

The system isn't perfect, but it works most of the time. When people start thinking they know better because their opinion isn't the same as what happened, because they think they are smarter, more knowledgeable and better at administering justice then the law, that's when things get dangerous.


Comshaw quote
That being said I will say you are very good at trying to attribute words and ideas to others that were neither spoken or expounded by them. That's a slimy, underhanded political tactic. You really should try a different tack.

BB:

That's because I don't actually do it.

I usually ask people something based upon what they said. Usually in an "If you think this then I must assume then XYZ...is that true and if so then XYA?" format.

So I'm not actually trying to attribute words and ideas to others that were never expressed by them as much as I walk them down my thought process to find a "WTF? Esplain. " at the end of it.


Also it's not a slimy underhanded political tactic, it's pretty straightforward argumentation method.

Here's the exchange:

Originally Posted by Comshaw

And that would be nothing like starting an investigation on Benghazi that extended out over 8 separate investigations and years then going off on an e-mail tangent just because you have the money, party majority and time now is it?
Na! Christ on a crutch, what was I thinking! It's good for the goose but not the goosee after all.


BB quote:
So I assume you're ok with Clinton doing something we regularly send poor people to the slammer for years, ruining and effectively ending any chance for a life after they get out 15-30 years later???

They should just overlook that because they happened upon it while investigating something else??

You've already admitted above that you ASSUME and attribute to me things that aren't in my post and by reading the two you should be able to see that what you wrote had nothing to do with the parallel I pointed out in mine, other then to accuse me of things not in evidence.

So attributing a statement or idea to someone else that was neither said nor implied is one of two things, either: 1) A slimy debate tactic that steers the argument away from the point in contention to one which you would rather address OR 2) Your thought processes are so convoluted and twisted you don't have the logical ability to follow a rational train of thought.

Either way you aren't very good at rational factual arguments.

Ta

Comshaw
 
For the record, I believe the Billaries are guilty as sin of a lot of things, possibly including a number of suspicious deaths. But for whatever reason, no charges have ever been brought. That in itself could mean a number of others are guilty of dereliction of duty or obstruction.

But NONE of that means that The Rumpster isn't also guilty of a number of things and should not be charged.
 
So let me see if I can put your post into a bit clearer terms.

You failed... horribly.

Even with 8 investigations, and all the foo fraa over the e-mail thing and the R's having a majority in both houses of congress the D's were able to protect Hillary and keep the R's from charging her for her nefarious actions?

Yes...do you not know how our government and judicial system work?

When you're homies with POTUS and AG....it doesn't matter what congress wants or finds on you.

My my she is a super criminal master mind isn't see?

No, just well connected to the right people, like the USAG and POTUS, and you can get away with fuckin' anything.

Oldest play in the book....La Cosa Nostra did it for like 70 fuckin' years.

Ever heard of the teflon Don?

So it is one or the other and you chose the twisted, unsubstantiated, idiotic idea of a deep state conspiracy.

How is it unsubstantiated?? Or even a conspiracy?

She got busted doing something that get's poor people put in a slammer regularly...there was a bunch of cloak and dagger meetings and suddenly she was untouchable.

What do you think happened?

It's blatant corruption and elitism, supported and loved by Democrats nationwide. They want to make the USA all like Detroit and Chicago!

Admittedly I lean more Liberal then conservative, but as I've said in the past, I'm a centrist.

LOL you're the "liberal" as in actual liberal or the CNN/FOX spin room version of liberal for basic socialist??

Considering the former is highly capitalistic and just left of libertarian I'm guessing the latter......

Centrist lol said the guy who leans HEAVILY left. :rolleyes:

You've already admitted above that you ASSUME and attribute to me things that aren't in my post

I made an assumption based off what you said and asked if it was correct....not the same thing.

You can keep trying to make your pile of ascription stick but you'll be desperate for a long time after I leave the conversation.

Either way you aren't very good at rational factual arguments.

Ta
[/SIZE]
Comshaw


I'm actually really good at them, you can tell by the wing nuts and leftist that all have me on iggy still.......I've yet to make any with you.
 
Last edited:
He and his bro Ishmael “know things.” Inside info, ya know?

Because of the lack of leaks you morons. At no point has the investigation been held close to the vest if they thought it was going to get Trump.
 
(snip)
I'm actually really good at them, you can tell by the wing nuts and leftist that all have me on iggy still.......I've yet to make any with you.

Only in your own mind. And I've already broken my daddy's rule by spending time arguing with a mule, so yes you have made it. It's rather interesting that the only two I will have on ignore are bb and BB. Go figure.

TA

Comshaw
 
Only in your own mind.


No....I did quite well while in school, UT, UC and Stanford also thought I was pretty good at it. Even had a prof. try to convince me law was where I should be.

And I've already broken my daddy's rule by spending time arguing with a mule

Awww and here comes the cheap shot name calling....typical and very 3rd grade.

Did you take lessons from your illiterate friend Cowslinger? :D

so yes you have made it. It's rather interesting that the only two I will have on ignore are bb and BB. Go figure.
[/SIZE]
TA

Comshaw


Oh so you're among the leftist who can't handle anything other than (D) worshiping. Must explain why you're spazzing out on here all the time trying to defend them like the male version of Hypoxia.

Maybe if you learn how to read and distinguish the difference between statements and questions I'll make the effort to intellectually skull fuck you back to your iggy bunker with the likes of hypoxia and vetteman.

Have a blessed day! ;)
 
Last edited:
One of the major players just stepped down in anticipation of getting a Lerner and a pension.
 
But NONE of that means that The Rumpster isn't also guilty of a number of things and should not be charged.

You mean impeached for, right?

And, can you please list these "number of things" President Trump could possibly be impeached for?
 
The free WiFi at Denny's during big breakfast hours must be blowing up. :D

No....I did quite well while in school, UT, UC and Stanford also thought I was pretty good at it. Even had a prof. try to convince me law was where I should be.



Awww and here comes the cheap shot name calling....typical and very 3rd grade.

Did you take lessons from your illiterate friend Cowslinger? :D




Oh so you're among the leftist who can't handle anything other than (D) worshiping. Must explain why you're spazzing out on here all the time trying to defend them like the male version of Hypoxia.

Maybe if you learn how to read and distinguish the difference between statements and questions I'll make the effort to intellectually skull fuck you back to your iggy bunker with the likes of hypoxia and vetteman.

Have a blessed day! ;)

Lol.. Someone else that realizes what a fuckin moron you are.

Look up megalomania.. And seek help.
 
Only in your own mind. And I've already broken my daddy's rule by spending time arguing with a mule, so yes you have made it. It's rather interesting that the only two I will have on ignore are bb and BB. Go figure.

TA

Comshaw

Our idiot friend botanydummy suffers from megalomania.. It's good to see what a useless thing it is to try having any discussion with him. He's wore everyone else out already..
 
You mean impeached for, right?

And, can you please list these "number of things" President Trump could possibly be impeached for?
High crimes and misdemeanors can include anything at all. There is evidence that Trump is guilty of collusion with Russia, obstruction of justice, violating the emoluments clause and tax fraud.
 
You failed... horribly.



Yes...do you not know how our government and judicial system work?

When you're homies with POTUS and AG....it doesn't matter what congress wants or finds on you.



No, just well connected to the right people, like the USAG and POTUS, and you can get away with fuckin' anything.


Oldest play in the book....La Cosa Nostra did it for like 70 fuckin' years.

Ever heard of the teflon Don?



How is it unsubstantiated?? Or even a conspiracy?

She got busted doing something that get's poor people put in a slammer regularly...there was a bunch of cloak and dagger meetings and suddenly she was untouchable.

What do you think happened?

It's blatant corruption and elitism, supported and loved by Democrats nationwide. They want to make the USA all like Detroit and Chicago!



LOL you're the "liberal" as in actual liberal or the CNN/FOX spin room version of liberal for basic socialist??

Considering the former is highly capitalistic and just left of libertarian I'm guessing the latter......

Centrist lol said the guy who leans HEAVILY left. :rolleyes:



I made an assumption based off what you said and asked if it was correct....not the same thing.

You can keep trying to make your pile of ascription stick but you'll be desperate for a long time after I leave the conversation.




I'm actually really good at them, you can tell by the wing nuts and leftist that all have me on iggy still.......I've yet to make any with you.

By "homies with" and "connected to" I assume you mean President Trump. It was he who effectively slammed the door on HRC's ultimate criminal prosecution.

Given that he did so, why are we still arguing about it?
 
By "homies with" and "connected to" I assume you mean President Trump. It was he who effectively slammed the door on HRC's ultimate criminal prosecution.

Given that he did so, why are we still arguing about it?

Prosecution for the email server. The Clinton Foundation investigation has been re-opened.
 
Prosecution for the email server. The Clinton Foundation investigation has been re-opened.
Look, Clintons!

Gups have spent around a billion USA taxpayer bucks over the last 25+ years investigating Clintons and finding nothing more than Wee Willie lying about a blowjob. But distractions are desperately needed, so let's spend more taxpayer money on more investigating stuff... using the same cast of clowns from prior probes. The same clowns too incompetent to find or fake anything juicy. Duh.

What kind of nation prosecutes electoral losers?
 
Lol.. Someone else that realizes what a fuckin moron you are.

Oh look Cowslinger again, name calling because every time he tries anything else he gets torn to fuckin' shreds. :D

Look up megalomania.. And seek help.

Don't have to, you've posted it like 10,000 times already....your record is broken worse than LJ's.

Our idiot friend botanydummy suffers from megalomania.

Oh really? And what medical school did you graduate from Mr. Barely Literate?

By "homies with" and "connected to" I assume you mean President Trump.

No....Trump didn't look the other way when Clinton was having shady meetings with AG Sessions in airplanes on tarmacs. Sessions didn't give Hillaries aids sweetheart immunity deals to STFU and go away.

That (the shady Bubba Lynch meeting) happened looks like 13 June 2016, just before FBI Director came out and said they caught her all kinds of fucked up felony shit...but wasn't recommending prosecution for some magical unknown reason. And miraculously Hillary's gang all got sweetheart immunity deals that September from Lynch to STFU and be gone.

Which I'm SUUUUUURE was a total coincidence and has nothing to do with why Hillary skated on something we lock poor, less connected elites for all the time because zero tolerance.......Unless Hillary Clinton of course.

It was he who effectively slammed the door on HRC's ultimate criminal prosecution.

You sure it wasn't those immunity deals he just wasn't able to work past?

Given that he did so, why are we still arguing about it?

Because it's there and a great piece of poo to toss at (D)'s when they are feeling all smug and superior.
 
What kind of nation prosecutes electoral losers?

A democratic one.

Democracy gives the average idiot way too much power, and it will be the downfall of the USA.

Dumbed down and soft we will Venezuela ourselves....I just hope you're around for the bringing about of the utopia comrade!
 
...
What kind of nation prosecutes electoral losers?

Well, I'm sure there is a line that can be crossed.

Imagine this headline:
Clinton kills campaign staff in first meeting after election
Candidate holes up in penthouse, mulls options with Bill, Chelsea

Now, you might think an arrest of Hillary Clinton is a bit over the top, but there are some among us who feel an arrest and, yes, felony charges, would be appropriate, even though victims of said crime are Democrats.
 
Hopefully Mueller will find an impeachable offense that our country can use to get rid of the clown sitting in the oval office.
 
Because of the lack of leaks you morons. At no point has the investigation been held close to the vest if they thought it was going to get Trump.
Guess you forgot Mueller is known for having people around him who know about not leaking information.
He's not like a white house or congressional staff. His people know if they leak it can fuck up a prosecution if it comes to that.

So your argument is that because he and his staff are acting professionally that they can't possibly have found anything.

That's a moronic argument.
 
Back
Top