Republicans are quite simply un-American

Americans believe in Freedom of Speech, we believe in Freedom of the Press, we believe in Freedom of Assembly. We believe in Freedom of Religion. We believe in Separation between Church and State. We believe in trials before a fair and impartial judge. We also believe in Separation of Powers between the three branches of government, to make it hard for one person to accumulate too much power and thus become a dictator.

More and more, we are seeing that Republicans reject American values.

Republicans seem to be rejecting EVERYTHING that is good about America! Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly, Freedom of the Press, Freedom of Religion and Separation of Church and State all seem to be alien ideas to these people!

They seem to want to live in a Christian theocracy, where the government tells you what religious doctrines you’ll follow and what church you’ll attend and criticizing the government will get you thrown into jail.

Back in the eighteenth century America fought a war to GET AWAY from a government like that! Now, Republicans are pushing America back in that direction!

Republicans are un-American. It’s just that simple.

Most Republicans have NEVER READ the United States Constitution and have NO IDEA what is in it! Rick Santorum is a Republican and has denied the existence of the Separation of Church and State in the U.S. Constitution, and dismissed it as a Communist idea that has no place in America!
 
Pathological hatred of Republicans & Trump

I don't hate liberals or Democrats. I simply disagree with them over a number of different political issues. What amazes me is how much liberal-Democrats vehemently HATE conservatives & Trump-supporters! Even the title of this particular thread ("Republicans are quite simply un-American") aptly illustrates the silliness of it all. I mean, since when is socialism considered to be pro-American? Socialist nations pretty-much all HATE America! Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, the old Soviet Union and Marxist-Socialist countries everywhere all despised us (even waging a "Cold War" against America & its allies until 1990), as did National-Socialist Germany in the 1940's (see: World War II).

And today, right here in the United States, why is it that all elected Muslim legislators are Democrats? Islamic Sharia Law is totally incompatible with our U.S. Constitution! Gays, minorities, & women are universally treated very poorly in nearly every Islamic country on our planet, but the modern Democratic Party seemingly welcomes them, pretty-much ignoring everything that Islam believes & represents. Again, it's almost like the pro-atheists dominating today's Democratic Party view Muslims as their natural allies in standing-up against America's traditional Judeo-Christian values & morals that made our nation a superpower where EVERYBODY seemingly wants to live (coming here both legally AND illegally!)

If President Trump was as bad as they imagine him to be, wouldn't poor minorities be attempting to FLEE instead of marching in caravans aimed directly at Trump's America, seeking entry?
 
What amazes me is how much liberal-Democrats vehemently HATE conservatives & Trump-supporters! Even the title of this particular thread ("Republicans are quite simply un-American") aptly illustrates the silliness of it all. I mean, since when is socialism considered to be pro-American?

As long as you are going to completely misrepresent what the issue is for liberals with Trump supporters, there's not much to discuss. Your premise is purposely whacky.
 
"Your premise is purposely wacky?"

KeithD writes: "As long as you are going to completely misrepresent what the issue is for liberals with Trump supporters, there's not much to discuss. Your premise is purposely whacky.."

How so?

I just said that I don't hate those people who disagree with me politically. How is that wacky? And how is it NOT wacky to vehemently hate all of those who don't share your political beliefs? Democrats regularly call President Trump and his supporters "racists," which only cheapens the use of that highly-charged word! I've heard liberals call Trump a "Nazi," which makes me wonder if they even know what Hitler's Nazi Party represented!

It's like the border wall. It's NOT the Berlin Wall or the Iron Curtain, built to keep people from escaping from living in oppressive Marxist-Socialist dictatorships. Trump's proposed border wall isn't trying to imprison anybody - no, it's like locks on your front door! You don't lock your doors at night because you hate everybody on the outside, but because you want to PROTECT those on the inside! How is that in any ways "immoral?"
 
KeithD writes: "As long as you are going to completely misrepresent what the issue is for liberals with Trump supporters, there's not much to discuss. Your premise is purposely whacky.."

How so?

The liberal disagreement with Trump supporters is about Trump, an amoral, immoral, congenital lying, insensitive, gross, woman abusing, con man, scam artist, corrupt, criminal, racist, blackmailed Russian asset, not about socialism. So you've lost me with your basic premise and I have no reason to read further. And I continue to have no further interest in where you are with your postings.
 
RubenR writes: "Are you insinuating that people with traditional Judeo-Christian values & morals support gays, minorities, & women and treat them well?"

Yes, the United States was built by people with Judeo-Christian values & morals. In fact, we fought the most destructive war in our nation's history (with more U.S. dead than even in World War II) to end slavery. And yes, today we enjoy a higher standard of living for America's minorities, women, & gay community than anywhere else in the world, despite the fact that we remain a mostly Judeo-Christian nation that modern liberals find offensive.

How does Marxist-Socialist Cuba treat it's gay population? How does Islamic Iran treat its women & gays? How does Saudi Arabia or Russia treat their ethnic minorities? NOBODY ever tries to sneak into those countries! NOBODY! But how many people want to live in Trump's America, and will attempt to sneak across our borders illegally if they can't get in legally?
 
KeithD writes: "The liberal disagreement with Trump supporters is about Trump, an amoral, immoral, congenital lying, insensitive, gross, woman abusing, con man, scam artist, corrupt, criminal, racist, blackmailed Russian asset, not about socialism. So you've lost me with your basic premise and I have no reason to read further. And I continue to have no further interest in where you are with your postings."

Yeah, I don't want Donald Trump to be the pastor of my church. He's got a braggadocious & bullying style, doesn't he?

As for his being an "amoral, congentital lying, insensitive, & woman-abusing con man," how exactly did you feel about President Clinton and his wife, Hillary? Are you aware that Bill Clinton was actually impeached for LYING-UNDER-OATH in an effort to block an investigation of his ongoing sexual-abuse against women brought against him by his own justice department? Did you support that impeachment?

As for America currently having its lowest-ever unemployment rates for black & Hispanic workers today than ever before, that doesn't sound all that racist to me. And are you aware that Donald Trump actually received a civil rights recognition award directly from the hands of Jesse Jackson himself? It seems that NOBODY considered Trump a racist until he defeated Hillary Clinton in 2016!
 
I don't hate liberals or Democrats. I simply disagree with them over a number of different political issues. What amazes me is how much liberal-Democrats vehemently HATE conservatives & Trump-supporters!

No, what's amazing is how much they deserve it.

Even the title of this particular thread ("Republicans are quite simply un-American") aptly illustrates the silliness of it all. I mean, since when is socialism considered to be pro-American?

That is an incredibly stupid nonsequitur.

And today, right here in the United States, why is it that all elected Muslim legislators are Democrats?

Because the GOP gives them no good reasons to be Republicans.

If President Trump was as bad as they imagine him to be, wouldn't poor minorities be attempting to FLEE instead of marching in caravans aimed directly at Trump's America, seeking entry?

No, because this is still where the good jobs are.
 
Last edited:
It's like the border wall. It's NOT the Berlin Wall or the Iron Curtain, built to keep people from escaping from living in oppressive Marxist-Socialist dictatorships. Trump's proposed border wall isn't trying to imprison anybody - no, it's like locks on your front door! You don't lock your doors at night because you hate everybody on the outside, but because you want to PROTECT those on the inside! How is that in any ways "immoral?"

The problem is not that it is immoral, but that it is expensive, environmentally destructive, and pointless.
 
Are you aware that Bill Clinton was actually impeached for LYING-UNDER-OATH in an effort to block an investigation of his ongoing sexual-abuse against women brought against him by his own justice department?

There was no abuse in it. Lewinski sucked his cock because she was in awe of him.
 
The GOP is a reflection of the depraved Republican base. There is no way a moral and ethical person could represent today's Republican voters. The party of Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt and Reagan is long gone. It is no longer conservative vs liberal ideas or governing philosophies, it is good vs evil.
 
The GOP is a reflection of the depraved Republican base. There is no way a moral and ethical person could represent today's Republican voters. The party of Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt and Reagan is long gone. It is no longer conservative vs liberal ideas or governing philosophies, it is good vs evil.

Change that to Evil vs Evil and maybe you have a point.
 
republicans AND white democrats. republicans of color are ok, as are democrats of color. Most liberals will agree that it is impossible for a white man to shed his innate, inbred racism.
 
RubenR writes: "Are you insinuating that people with traditional Judeo-Christian values & morals support gays, minorities, & women and treat them well?"

Yes, the United States was built by people with Judeo-Christian values & morals. In fact, we fought the most destructive war in our nation's history (with more U.S. dead than even in World War II) to end slavery. And yes, today we enjoy a higher standard of living for America's minorities, women, & gay community than anywhere else in the world, despite the fact that we remain a mostly Judeo-Christian nation that modern liberals find offensive.

How does Marxist-Socialist Cuba treat it's gay population? How does Islamic Iran treat its women & gays? How does Saudi Arabia or Russia treat their ethnic minorities? NOBODY ever tries to sneak into those countries! NOBODY! But how many people want to live in Trump's America, and will attempt to sneak across our borders illegally if they can't get in legally?

Where are you coming up with that BS?

“The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.” —John Adams

The Fictional God of Abraham is an evil creation of man.

Fictional Jesus was a liar.

And Jesus answered and said to them, “Truly I say to you, if you have faith and do not doubt, you will not only do what was done to the fig tree, but even if you say to this mountain, `Be taken up and cast into the sea,’ it will happen. “And all things you ask in prayer, believing, you will receive.” (Matthew 21:21-22)

Jesus supported slavery.

Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ. (Ephesians 6:5)


In the following parable, Jesus clearly approves of beating slaves even if they didn’t know they were doing anything wrong.

The servant will be severely punished, for though he knew his duty, he refused to do it. “But people who are not aware that they are doing wrong will be punished only lightly. Much is required from those to whom much is given, and much more is required from those to whom much more is given.” (Luke 12:47-48)

The most evil part of the US in the Bible Belt. Lincoln should have executed all the traitors and that would have purged the gene pool of right wing trash.
 
RubenR writes:"Then I think you are an idiot to believe that."

Yeah, that's exactly what I was writing about in my first post on this thread.

I strongly believe that my liberal friends are wrong, whereas they seemingly think that I am evil or an idiot. And yet, look at what's happening right now in Venezuela with the epic failure that is the implementation of socialism, and then look at what modern Democrats like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or Bernie Sanders want for this country. Obama supporters know what it is that these people represent, but they'd rather expend all of their energies attacking President Trump and his supporters as evil and/or idiots.

Modern liberals embrace socialism, Islam, open borders, and anything else they can think of that eats away at those things that made America a great country where others want to live. WHY do so many people want to move to Trump's America, even if they have to break our laws to get here? And where ELSE is this happening?
 
Last edited:
JSABD writes: "Fictional Jesus was a liar."

You are fortunate to live in the United States of America where you can post things like that (and far worse things), all thanks to our nation's historic Judeo-Christian values & traditions, resulting in our U.S. Constitutional protections regarding things like free speech!

In the Muslim world, they would demand your death by stoning if you were caught writing such a thing about Allah or the prophet Muhammed. In fact, even here in the United States, if you draw a cartoon that includes the prophet Muhammed somewhere in it, and it should somehow get published, they are very likely to come after you.

It's perfect safe, however, to insult Jesus, because Christians accept the protections afforded by the U.S. Constitution, which is completely incompatible with Islamic Sharia Law!

"Lincoln should have executed all the traitors and that would have purged the gene pool of right wing trash."

Lincoln was assassinated while the Civil War was still going on, and was succeeded by a Democrat U.S. Senator from Tennessee (think of Al Gore back in 1865) who still had strong southern sympathies. But had honest Abe actually executed all of those Democrat slave-owners that would have certainly ENDED the Democratic Party, wouldn't it?
 
Last edited:
Note: It's freedom FROM religion that matters.

The Creator doesn't fucking care which way this ends, because he'll have a billion years to do something else that may work out.:)
 
JSABD writes: "Fictional Jesus was a liar."

You are fortunate to live in the United States of America where you can post things like that (and far worse things), all thanks to our nation's historic Judeo-Christian values & traditions, resulting in our U.S. Constitutional protections regarding things like free speech!

In the Muslim world, they would demand your death by stoning if you were caught writing such a thing about Allah or the prophet Muhammed. In fact, even here in the United States, if you draw a cartoon that includes the prophet Muhammed somewhere in it, and it should somehow get published, they are very likely to come after you.

It's perfect safe, however, to insult Jesus, because Christians accept the protections afforded by the U.S. Constitution, which is completely incompatible with Islamic Sharia Law!

"Lincoln should have executed all the traitors and that would have purged the gene pool of right wing trash."

Lincoln was assassinated while the Civil War was still going on, and was succeeded by a Democrat U.S. Senator from Tennessee (think of Al Gore back in 1865) who still had strong southern sympathies. But had honest Abe actually executed all of those Democrat slave-owners that would have certainly ENDED the Democratic Party, wouldn't it?

These open borders. Can they work both ways? Can we ship Jas to Mexico or maybe even Brazil? Yeah. Brazil. He can be a Brazil Nut! :D
 
RudenR writes: "And about that war you were talking about? You might want to start about Democrats being the racists--we've been there before--but end of the line, those were people with traditional Judeo-Chistian values and morals, I think."

It makes you wonder... what if Hitler's Nazi Party had evolved over the past sixty-years, and was today a pro-choice, tax-&-spend political organization that was right now demanding open borders and the abolition of ICE? Could they have morphed into an American mainstream party today? "Nazi" is already short for 'National-Socialist," so the socialist portion of their economic agenda wouldn't even have to change!

Despite America's Democratic Party abandoning its racist/segregationist roots vigorously adopted (and enforced) over the one-hundred years following the American Civil War, the Dems kept the loyalties of men like Robert Byrd, who reached the high-rank of "Exalted Cyclops" in the Ku Kux Klan in his younger days, before then successfully running to become a Democratic Party U.S. Senator representing the state of West Virginia.

In 2009, Byrd earned President Obama's eternal gratitude when his became the deciding vote to pass the president's signature legislation (aka: ObamaCare), and so, when the senator (and former KKK officer) passed away the following year, the president actually delivered the eulogy at his funeral! It just goes to show how someone with a virulently racist past can STILL be welcomed within today's Democratic Party - including by our nation's first-ever black president!
 
Last edited:
RudenR writes: "And about that war you were talking about? You might want to start about Democrats being the racists--we've been there before--but end of the line, those were people with traditional Judeo-Chistian values and morals, I think."

It makes you wonder... what if Hitler's Nazi Party had evolved over the past sixty-years, and was today a pro-choice, tax-&-spend political organization that was right now demanding open borders and the abolition of ICE? Could they have morphed into an American mainstream party today? "Nazi" is already short for 'National-Socialist," so the socialist portion of their economic agenda wouldn't even have to change!

Despite America's Democratic Party abandoning its racist/segregationist roots vigorously adopted (and enforced) over the one-hundred years following the American Civil War, the Dems kept the loyalties of men like Robert Byrd, who reached the high-rank of "Exalted Cyclops" in the Ku Kux Klan in his younger days, before then successfully running to become a Democratic Party U.S. Senator representing the state of West Virginia.

In 2009, Byrd earned President Obama's eternal gratitude when his became the deciding vote to pass the president's signature legislation (aka: ObamaCare), and so, when the senator (and former KKK officer) passed away the following year, the president actually delivered the eulogy at his funeral! It just goes to show how someone with a virulently racist past can STILL be welcomed within today's Democratic Party - including by our nation's first-ever black president!
Bad example. Robert Byrd renounced his racism and earned support from civil rights groups. And if he had preferred not to be eulogized by a black man, he had every opportunity to demand that.
 
And yet, look at what's happening right now in Venezuela with the epic failure that is the implementation of socialism, and then look at what modern Democrats like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or Bernie Sanders want for this country.

Not the same thing. AOC and Sanders want Euro-style social democracy -- a redistributive tax system and a vigorous welfare state, without public ownership of the means of production -- which works very well wherever it has been tried, and is not socialism, even when the parties pushing it have "socialist" in their names.
 
5adc8644d7352d14626b1d28417962a6b917922dd5816d9de1d3ae41891435aa.jpg
 
Back
Top