Tax the Rich?

Interesting hypocrisy. Your maniacal hatred of "D's" will stoop to nothing.

It's ok for you to say Fuck the poor, but not the Dems, because . . . then how will hating Ds be your mission in life.



And they don't even conflict with one another, my opinion on the poor and their status as such has nothing to do with the behavior of (D)'s or (R)'s or any other political party, representative or entity.

The poor do need to step up their game and the (D)'s are always rat fucking the working class.
 
Interesting hypocrisy. Your maniacal hatred of "D's" will stoop to nothing.

It's ok for you to say Fuck the poor, but not the Dems, because . . . then how will hating Ds be your mission in life.

I'm not being hypocritical by pointing out (D) hypocrisy.

The only hypocrites being discussed are the (D)'s and their supporters who bitch about this tax plan taxing the poor/working/middle class....after taking the poor/working/middle class to the cleaners with Obamacare and cheering it on.

If you actually care about the poor/working/middle class then (D)'s are the FUCKING ENEMY!!!

They fuck the poor/working/middle class harder than anyone...
 
Last edited:
They fuck the poor/working/middle class harder than anyone...

Hardly. You've got no proof except for the 20 million Americans that have health care now thanks to Obamacare. Many of who were poor and covered by the Medicaid expansion. It will be a disaster when you're hero the Orange Nazi signs this tax bill. Maine just voted to expand Medicaid under Obamacare.

Wow another epic destruction of your asshole! I left your asshole so gaping you could drive a truck up there. I sense another fact free rage quit coming on.

i-dont-know-if-you-just-got-wrecked-or-if-you-got-uber-wrecked.jpg
 
Aren't you the nutjob who began stalking me on a PM?

Yeah, just double checked. You did. 7/30/17

Freak

Oh, okay, I missed that one little PM in looking back the first time. Because you said "stalking," I was looking for a series of PMs.

That one little PM comes from a time before I realized the way you debate is primarily through irrelevancies and ad hominem attacks, because you usually cannot support your opinions with facts or logic. Back then, I actually expected and hoped to see your side of the issue in order to enjoy an intelligent debate. Here is what I wrote:

DawnODay said:
Hi Flower!

(Or should it be "Snowflake"?)

I responded to your disingenuous non-response.

Can you actually support your opinions, or do I win?​

Love ya!

Dawn.

It turned out I won there, just like I did here, because your position had no logical or factual basis.

If you consider that "stalking," then you really are a snowflake.
 
The ONLY legitimate reason the government may tax the people is for expressly Constitutional government NEEDS (not its WANTS), and can only rightly be collected from the people on an equal basis, not weighted for or against any particular person or group. To do otherwise automatically introduces bias and discriminatory taxation policies, which are illegal. Income taxes, originally determined to be unconstitutional, need to be returned to that status by repealing the XVI Amendment, and shuttering the abusive tyranny of the IRS forever.
 
Hardly. You've got no proof

Except those fees everyone is going to be paying.....because it's a regressive tax from a Republican policy.

You voted (D) and Obama....got (R)omney care anyhow.

The best part is you love and defend that republican scam, all they had to do was put Obama's name on it and you were SOLD on Romneycare.

except for the 20 million Americans that have health care now thanks to Obamacare.

For only the astronomical ass fucking of what...5 times the price of Universal HC for all citizens should cost?

Good job dummies.:rolleyes:

Wow another epic destruction of your asshole!

LOL hardly....keep dreaming though, it will be almost as true as Obamacare not being a Republican scam and you loving it .
 
The ONLY legitimate reason the government may tax the people is for expressly Constitutional government NEEDS (not its WANTS), and can only rightly be collected from the people on an equal basis, not weighted for or against any particular person or group. To do otherwise automatically introduces bias and discriminatory taxation policies, which are illegal. Income taxes, originally determined to be unconstitutional, need to be returned to that status by repealing the XVI Amendment, and shuttering the abusive tyranny of the IRS forever.
So when the tax code is altered to favor friends and donors of the people in Congress, that's a bad thing. If it helps keep those people who altered that tax code in power, that becomes a very bad thing, because that's bias and discriminatory policies.
 
Sorry, anyone who contacts me through PM to say "I won" like that's a normal thing to do with someone you do not know is a.) a nut job and b.) a stalker.

I never had the slightest intention of engaging seriously with you. I never considered myself in a zero sum game with you. I never saw you as anyone but a nutter, and then you popped up in my PERSONAL mail to claim you "won" which confirmed it.

Oh my god! Oh my god! No, no, don't call me a snowflake, please!

Freak

Oh, okay, I missed that one little PM in looking back the first time. Because you said "stalking," I was looking for a series of PMs.

That one little PM comes from a time before I realized the way you debate is primarily through irrelevancies and ad hominem attacks, because you usually cannot support your opinions with facts or logic. Back then, I actually expected and hoped to see your side of the issue in order to enjoy an intelligent debate. Here is what I wrote:



It turned out I won there, just like I did here, because your position had no logical or factual basis.

If you consider that "stalking," then you really are a snowflake.
 
Last edited:
Dawn and bot are getting wrecked and triggered now. How sad.

Notice how they don't actually refute anything? Just continue to post with their gaping assholes flapping in the breeze. Their hero the Orange Nazi would call that #sad!

9db995f9200b6636a766ea44adee6be5e8b6958b8031e37135930dc5199e6bcc.jpg
 
Then you have no experience of life, just stupid memes.

You're a complete lightweight if you think you've seen me "triggered." Lmao.

Aside from calling Drumpf a Nazi Racist, which he is, you've never heard me express my real views on so-called Social Justice. You don't have a clue.


But....you are so very much one of them.


Hell every time I see your name all I see in my minds eye is....
avHnbUZ.gif
MoAQjf7.jpg


giphy.gif
 
You haven't yet turned yourself in, traitor? Don't wait much longer.
The ONLY legitimate reason the government may tax... [yada yada]
Shove your theology down other throats. US Constitution, Article I, Section 8:
1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

2: To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

3: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

4: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

5: To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;​
IOW Congress creates, borrows, taxes, and spends money exactly as it wishes, always under the excuse, "to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare..." Spew all the fantasies you wish. Reality is whatever bites your ass.

You really must turn yourself in soon, traitor. Take your rope.
 
Then you have no experience of life, just stupid memes.

You're a complete lightweight if you think you've seen me "triggered." Lmao.

Aside from calling Drumpf a Nazi Racist, which he is, you've never heard me express my real views on so-called Social Justice. You don't have a clue.

Now that is just untrue.

And Trump is a racist...he's not a Nazi.
 
Then you have no experience of life, just stupid memes.

You're a complete lightweight if you think you've seen me "triggered." Lmao.

Aside from calling Drumpf a Nazi Racist, which he is, you've never heard me express my real views on so-called Social Justice. You don't have a clue.

Bot is a snowflake. Ask him how many times I've made him rage quit over calling out his lies (military, wealth, education, non-racism) he whines like a bitch. As I keep saying I've owned him so much he's literally going to be shoveling my walk when it snows tomorrow at the snap of my fingers.

You also notice how he doesn't actually refute anything? He just bitches that it's partisan. It's not even an argument just a crying sound he makes as we drive truckloads of hurt up his gaping asshole.

Plus, he's fun to troll because he always takes the bait, always.
 
Bot is a snowflake. Ask him how many times I've made him rage quit over calling out his lies (military, wealth, education, non-racism) he whines like a bitch. As I keep saying I've owned him so much he's literally going to be shoveling my walk when it snows tomorrow at the snap of my fingers.

You also notice how he doesn't actually refute anything? He just bitches that it's partisan. It's not even an argument just a crying sound he makes as we drive truckloads of hurt up his gaping asshole.

Plus, he's fun to troll because he always takes the bait, always.

The mentally handicap can't drive trucks buddy....:cool:
 
Not at all. I don't generally argue about things like feminism, BLM or other "social" issues with ignoramuses who know nothing. I just don't. You know squat about what I really think.

A case in point.

You've admitted you see no reason to process "nuance" when discussing Trump's similarity to Nazis. It doesn't matter how many times people explain it to you, you just shit your pants (I mean, get triggered) assuming everyone is saying he's got his own SS and has already built his camps and ovens.

ie, you cannot process any distinction between people making arguments (lots of articles and books on it nowadays) supported by the million things the Orange idiot says and does (which you are totally ignorant of) and Teabagger Freaks chanting Hitler at Obama. it's all the same to you because: TRIGGERED


Now that is just untrue.

And Trump is a racist...he's not a Nazi.
 
Not at all. I don't generally argue about things like feminism, BLM or other "social" issues with ignoramuses who know nothing. I just don't. You know squat about what I really think.

LOL you've exposed yourself enough since the election got really started to know you're a flaming SJW snowflake.

A case in point.

You've admitted you see no reason to process "nuance" when discussing Trump's similarity to Nazis. It doesn't matter how many times people explain it to you, you just shit your pants (I mean, get triggered) assuming everyone is saying he's got his own SS and has already built his camps and ovens.

The "nuance" is every bit the bullshit the "nuance" bat shit (R)'s used to compare Obama to Stalin....bunch of loonies.

ie, you cannot process any distinction between people making arguments (lots of articles and books on it nowadays) supported by the million things the Orange idiot says and does (which you are totally ignorant of) and Teabagger Freaks chanting Hitler at Obama.

Speaking of ignorant... the "Teabagger Freaks" chanted Stalin at Obama.

1620929_713655955341238_1300203318_n.jpg


it's all the same to you because: TRIGGERED

It's all the same to me because they are both equally absurd.
 
BotanyBoy said:
The mentally handicap can't drive trucks buddy....
You've never been to Texas, I gather.

And why can't they? Because they're unsafe behind the wheel.

They can still get all the guns they want.
That's because it don't take much brainpower to sneak up on bovines.
You just stand there looking cute
And if something moves, you shoot
Well there's ten stuffed heads in my trophy room right now
Two game wardens, seven hunters, and a cow
--T.Lehrer​
Ah, the Amerikkkan creed: Shoot or be shot. Kill or be killed. That's freedom.

ObTopic: Tax unearned incomes at high rates and earned incomes at low rates. Keep most of what you sweat for. Lose much of what squirts your way. If enough taxes aren't levied, start some gov't-owned casino resorts. People voluntarily impoverish themselves in such places.
 
Sorry, anyone who contacts me through PM to say "I won" like that's a normal thing to do with someone you do not know is a.) a nut job and b.) a stalker.

I never had the slightest intention of engaging seriously with you. I never considered myself in a zero sum game with you. I never saw you as anyone but a nutter, and then you popped up in my PERSONAL mail to claim you "won" which confirmed it.

Oh my god! Oh my god! No, no, don't call me a snowflake, please!

Freak

If being a factual, logical, and passionate debater of public policy and politics makes me a "freak," then I'll embrace the title. You have my permission to continue calling me "freak."

In any case, I'd rather be a freak than an emotional snowflake who bases arguments on what feels good rather than on the lessons of history and principals of economics. I don't doubt you never had any intention to engage me seriously in debate. You're not up to the challenge. The results have been self-evident: repeated instances of me showing that I have the better informed, more factual and logical position.

Now let's turn to something more serious and important.

Yesterday, I heard on the radio a reputable source that the Senate version of tax reform would actually raise taxes on 14% of current taxpayers. The example given was an individual taxpayer, making $200,000.00 annually, who lives in a high tax state and itemizes. I think this is a big mistake.

The reason the Senate plan does this is because the Senate sought deficit neutrality based on recent economic conditions. What that ignores, of course, is that tax reforms like those being proposed inevitably lead to economic growth and increased revenue. Let's hope the Conference Committee comes up with a viable version that provides needed tax relief to all tax payers!
 
Perhaps you missed all the referenced links in Post #2 that argue "tax reforms like those being proposed" do NOT "inevitably lead to economic growth."

There's also the fact that the current R Tax "Reform" Cuts arrives with NO broad support from economists, business leaders, doctors, labor, the CBO, etc. Even the White House (via Steve Mnuchin) CANNOT and HAS NOT provided any projections or data to support such a view. Normally, they mash together propaganda from R Wing Think Tanks, but they haven't even been able to do that.

There's also the fact that even if in a magical world they "inevitably" lead to "economic growth" and "increased revenue," there's no "inevitable" job creation, much less GOOD job creation and increases wages. The only thing "inevitable" is that stockholders increase their wealth.

If you want to argue that the rich just get richer, by all means, do that. You've made NO argument that everyone benefits in the end--you're just relying on a mystical, magical myth called Trickle Down


What that ignores, of course, is that tax reforms like those being proposed inevitably lead to economic growth and increased revenue.
 
If you want to argue that the rich just get richer, by all means, do that. You've made NO argument that everyone benefits in the end--you're just relying on a mystical, magical myth called Trickle Down

Those who participate get richer and those who don't...don't. As it should be.

Trickle Down isn't a myth....it just isn't the silver bullet that ends all poverty.

Fuck "everyone", not "everyone" gets the fuck off their ass or puts their cock on the block to make that money so they don't deserve any. The trickle down is there, but you have to go get it.
 
Here we go again.

1. Fuck the poor, get off your asses.

2. The D's are always "rat-fucking" the working class as if that's a bad thing.

If the Dems constantly "fuck over" the working class, and you whole heartedly support the motto of "fuck the poor," then that makes you an enthusiastic D.

Those who participate get richer and those who don't...don't. As it should be.

Trickle Down isn't a myth....it just isn't the silver bullet that ends all poverty.

Fuck "everyone", not "everyone" gets the fuck off their ass or puts their cock on the block to make that money so they don't deserve any. The trickle down is there, but you have to go get it.
 
Back
Top