Demonstrations in San Francisco area

For the record, if these fools marched peacefully without guns, swastikas, and hoods and didn't invade towns chanting terrorist slogans, there would be less of a justification for violence against them.
 
I wonder if the black shirts burn down Carnal's house or car and attacked Carnal's family if he/she would feel different about the criminals? They are the Soros' black shirts, they themselves pro Nazi as their leader is. There is no difference between a leftist and a fascists, that is why Progressives and Leftist called themselves both Socialists just like Stalin and Hitler did.

"Their faces hidden behind black bandannas and hoodies, about 100 anarchists and antifa— “anti-fascist” — members barreled into a protest Sunday afternoon in Berkeley’s Martin Luther King Jr. Civic Center Park. Jumping over plastic and concrete barriers, the group melted into a larger crowd of around 2,000 that had marched peacefully throughout the sunny afternoon for a “Rally Against Hate” gathering."

These are the same Black Shirts that caused problems in MD, MO, FA, etc. The same that called themselves "Wall Streeter's" etc. Criminals paid by Soros and company (on his pay roll are such wonderful people as Clinton, Obama, McCain, etc. as well as the leftist and fascists media).

What they do is change their name, but not their dress or cause which is the downfall of human rights, civil rights and freedom. As a note, they came to a town in CA called Huntington Beach to cause trouble, only the people turned on them, torn their hoods off and circled them and gave them hell. But you didn't see that on the main stream media. You see the people have no use for leftist, communists, Nazis, street gangs or drug pushers and corrupt politicians and the lying media. That is why such uneducated people like Carnal have to lie and come to their defense. Why they can't win an honest election or have the ability to rule without wanting a police state.

Of course we are against slavery, etc. What they are doing is making fools of themselves and liars by "protesting" something that happened a 100 years ago and blaming people today for it. If that is a good reason then remember, the Democratic Party was the slave party and still treats blacks as second class citizens saying (for example) that they are too stupid to go and get I.D. from the DMV for voter I.D. Clinton showed how they feel about blacks by their treatment of the Haitian people whose country they turned into their own plantation. So if you are going to tear down statues (most of which were put up by Democrats) then you must also tear down the Democratic Party. That is really stupid reasoning on your part.

And you don't hear one person from the left complain about slavery that still exists in the world today. They don't protest about the communists lack of human rights and how they murder their own people without cause other than political.

I would love to see Carnal and the Black Shirts pull their b.s. in N. Korea or China or Iran. Off with their heads.
 
They existed in one form or another way before Trump. Look up the WTO riots in Seattle in the 90's, the anarchist movement since then. It's been a tradition here in Seattle/Portland for quite a while during the May Day marches.

What possibly has changed is the focus..

You are correct that anarchists have been around for some time. Left wing extremists groups, of any significance have a short shelf life. If antifa becomes significant the FBI will terminate them with extreme prejudice.
 
You are correct that anarchists have been around for some time. Left wing extremists groups, of any significance have a short shelf life. If antifa becomes significant the FBI will terminate them with extreme prejudice.
I think it's safe to say most law enforcement agencies focus more on lefty than righty organizations, with infiltrations, agents provocateur, forgeries, the whole afore-mentioned Cointelpro strategy. Why? Could it be that most LEO attitudes are more righty than lefty?
 
I think it's safe to say most law enforcement agencies focus more on lefty than righty organizations, with infiltrations, agents provocateur, forgeries, the whole afore-mentioned Cointelpro strategy. Why? Could it be that most LEO attitudes are more righty than lefty?

No, it's because leftists are more violent and are more prone to destroy anything they can. Left to their own devices, right wingers will march or demonstrate, say their pieces and then disperse. But they will defend themselves when attacked.
 
No, it's because leftists are more violent and are more prone to destroy anything they can. Left to their own devices, right wingers will march or demonstrate, say their pieces and then disperse. But they will defend themselves when attacked.

Do you honestly believe that? I'm curious.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101 View Post

No, it's because leftists are more violent and are more prone to destroy anything they can. Left to their own devices, right wingers will march or demonstrate, say their pieces and then disperse. But they will defend themselves when attacked.


Do you honestly believe that? I'm curious.

Just look at Charlottesville The march was peaceful until "counter demonstrators" attacked the marchers. After that, the violence began.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101 View Post

No, it's because leftists are more violent and are more prone to destroy anything they can. Left to their own devices, right wingers will march or demonstrate, say their pieces and then disperse. But they will defend themselves when attacked.




Just look at Charlottesville The march was peaceful until "counter demonstrators" attacked the marchers. After that, the violence began.

I don't really care to get into a prolonged debate with you but did you see the clip of the nazi firing his gun in Charlottesville?

The militia's around the country, the oath keepers and bundy fucks, are they liberal or conservative?
 
a. The Neo-Nazi march was NOT "peaceful"

b. How do you know who started the hitting? All I saw was a melee with people fighting each other. Did you see anyone throw the first punch?

c. A Neo-Nazi was charged with murder (running his car from behind into people not doing anything at the time). Another was charged with assault of a black guy (almost killed him). Another for firing a gun at protestors.

d. You think tossing a garbage can into a window is worse than mowing someone down in your car. Worse than lynching. Worse than burning people in ovens. All ok because leftists are violent.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101 View Post

No, it's because leftists are more violent and are more prone to destroy anything they can. Left to their own devices, right wingers will march or demonstrate, say their pieces and then disperse. But they will defend themselves when attacked.




Just look at Charlottesville The march was peaceful until "counter demonstrators" attacked the marchers. After that, the violence began.
 
The only people who have been arrested so far in the 12 August Charlottesville riot have been white supremacists. Christopher Cantwell (the guy in the Vice TV documentary that's gone viral) for assault on Friday night, two guys (one still on the run) for assault in a parking garage on Saturday, the guy who fired his gun on Saturday morning at the park, and the car driver for murder and dozens (so far) of other charges. Stay tuned, Crazy Box.
 
I don't really care to get into a prolonged debate with you but did you see the clip of the nazi firing his gun in Charlottesville?

The militia's around the country, the oath keepers and bundy fucks, are they liberal or conservative?

This is probably the video you mentioned. The man in question seems to be firing his gun at some bushes. According to the text, he fired in the direction of some people wo were throwing things at him and his cohorts. That would make it self-defense. http://www.joemygod.com/2017/08/28/man-arrested-firing-gun-nazi-rally-video/

The militias vary through the political spectrum. The oath keepers are conservatives who have sworn to be good citizens. Bundy and his allies had a non-political argument over grazing rights on some land where they have a right to be.
 
No, it's because leftists are more violent and are more prone to destroy anything they can. Left to their own devices, right wingers will march or demonstrate, say their pieces and then disperse. But they will defend themselves when attacked.
I missed the stories of leftists lynching people in their front yards in the dead of night. When was that?
 
Just read my post again. He probably shouldn't have even been arrested, if he was defending himself.

Exercising that law degree you don't have? You don't have a lick of common sense.

As usual you're running on zero information. He's been charged with discharging a gun within 1,000 feet of a school, which is against the law in Virginia. There are two schools closer than that to where he was standing at the time. It's sort of a slam dunk charge. They have him firing a gun on tape and they can precisely locate where he was standing. I'm sure that, in your usual dopey way, you'll claim the schools have been moved and weren't there at the time. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Exercising that law degree you don't have? You don't have a lick of common sense.

As usual you're running on zero information. He's been charged with discharging a gun within 1,000 feet of a school, which is against the law in Virginia. There are two schools closer than that to where he was standing at the time. It's sort of a slam dunk charge. They have him firing a gun on tape and they can precisely locate where he was standing. I'm sure that, in your usual dopey way, you'll claim the schools have been moved and weren't there at the time. :rolleyes:

I did read that in the text also but, because he was defending himself, it should not apply. Let's see what the courts have to say about it.
 
.....

Nevermind. As usual, posting to you is a waste of time and energy.
 
Last edited:
Even with no provocation, the demonstrators assaulted people for no reason. This is according to videotapes I saw on the TV news earlier.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...narchists-swarm-anti-hate-rally-in-california

Berkeley, Calif. (AP) -- An anti-hate rally was disrupted when scores of anarchists wearing black clothing and masks stormed the demonstration in Berkeley and attacked several supporters of President Donald Trump. But police were able to head off any wider violence.

Thousands gathered Sunday in response to a planned anti-Marxism protest that was canceled amid concerns demonstrators might be attacked. The counter-demonstration was largely peaceful for several hours until the antifa, or anti-fascists, overran police barricades around the protest area. The violence was swift but brief, and among those targeted was Joey Gibson, leader of the right-wing organization Patriot Prayer that had called off a demonstration a day earlier in San Francisco.

I find it interesting that the ones who call themselves "anti-hate" are the ones who are doing the hating.
 
Last edited:
Antifas activists are obviously thugs hired off Craigslist by agents of the Koch Bros (who are much richer than George Soros) in a nefarious plot to defame and demonize leftists. Pathetic!
 
If I ever march in a Nazi rally with a semi-automatic, I'll let you know.


I wonder if the black shirts burn down Carnal's house or car and attacked Carnal's family if he/she would feel different about the criminals? They are the Soros' black shirts, they themselves pro Nazi as their leader is. There is no difference between a leftist and a fascists, that is why Progressives and Leftist called themselves both Socialists just like Stalin and Hitler did.

"Their faces hidden behind black bandannas and hoodies, about 100 anarchists and antifa— “anti-fascist” — members barreled into a protest Sunday afternoon in Berkeley’s Martin Luther King Jr. Civic Center Park. Jumping over plastic and concrete barriers, the group melted into a larger crowd of around 2,000 that had marched peacefully throughout the sunny afternoon for a “Rally Against Hate” gathering."

These are the same Black Shirts that caused problems in MD, MO, FA, etc. The same that called themselves "Wall Streeter's" etc. Criminals paid by Soros and company (on his pay roll are such wonderful people as Clinton, Obama, McCain, etc. as well as the leftist and fascists media).

What they do is change their name, but not their dress or cause which is the downfall of human rights, civil rights and freedom. As a note, they came to a town in CA called Huntington Beach to cause trouble, only the people turned on them, torn their hoods off and circled them and gave them hell. But you didn't see that on the main stream media. You see the people have no use for leftist, communists, Nazis, street gangs or drug pushers and corrupt politicians and the lying media. That is why such uneducated people like Carnal have to lie and come to their defense. Why they can't win an honest election or have the ability to rule without wanting a police state.

Of course we are against slavery, etc. What they are doing is making fools of themselves and liars by "protesting" something that happened a 100 years ago and blaming people today for it. If that is a good reason then remember, the Democratic Party was the slave party and still treats blacks as second class citizens saying (for example) that they are too stupid to go and get I.D. from the DMV for voter I.D. Clinton showed how they feel about blacks by their treatment of the Haitian people whose country they turned into their own plantation. So if you are going to tear down statues (most of which were put up by Democrats) then you must also tear down the Democratic Party. That is really stupid reasoning on your part.

And you don't hear one person from the left complain about slavery that still exists in the world today. They don't protest about the communists lack of human rights and how they murder their own people without cause other than political.

I would love to see Carnal and the Black Shirts pull their b.s. in N. Korea or China or Iran. Off with their heads.
 
Back
Top