COVID-19 RESOURCES
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Laurel wants to ban me

Status
Not open for further replies.
You were getting your ass kicked in a discussion, and you called someone by their real name.

The terms of service say not to do that, and you got your "final warning" about that, which indicates to me this isn't the first time you've done this.

Actions have consequences.
 
When it comes right down to it, I don't think she really needs a reason.

She's got da power.
 
RobDownSouth said:
You were getting your ass kicked in a discussion, and you called someone by their real name.

The terms of service say not to do that, and you got your "final warning" about that, which indicates to me this isn't the first time you've done this.

Actions have consequences.
Click to expand...

Got it wrong as usual, Rob. There was no discussion. Funkensien posted a face av that was as horrendous as Warrior Queens. I stated my opinion that she had a lot of nerve calling WQ fugly, when in fact she is just as fugly. Then, in a snit Funk started posting selfies in which she did not remove the author signature from the pics. I pointed out to her her mistake and she volunteered that the embedded name was her actual name. I of course had no idea it was her real name, how would I? Funk was the one posting personal information, not me. Download a pic, right click and view the details tab. It's a rookie mistake for someone that likes to plaster their image all over the internet, don't you think? Then she whines about someone sending those pics to her employer. Give me a break.

And if you would like to post a link to where I have ever posted personal information, please provide it. Otherwise, you might want to retract that slander.

This site has moderators calling posters pedophiles, awards being given to posters for posting copyrighted underage material, trolls wishing death and disease on other posters.

Are you all caught up now?
 
MonaLittle said:
When it comes right down to it, I don't think she really needs a reason.

She's got da power.
Click to expand...

She's just as concerned with her cool kid reputation as you and her other minions. She will make it look justified. When you're judge and jury, the evidence miraculously just disappears.
 
Laurel is the one person who can see all your current and previous user names. If she wants to ban you, she has a good reason. In the history of Lit, I haven't seen a ban which wasn't warranted.
 
ms_ann_thrope said:
Got it wrong as usual, Rob. There was no discussion. Funkensien posted a face av that was as horrendous as Warrior Queens. I stated my opinion that she had a lot of nerve calling WQ fugly, when in fact she is just as fugly. Then, in a snit Funk started posting selfies in which she did not remove the author signature from the pics. I pointed out to her her mistake and she volunteered that the embedded name was her actual name. I of course had no idea it was her real name, how would I? Funk was the one posting personal information, not me. Download a pic, right click and view the details tab. It's a rookie mistake for someone that likes to plaster their image all over the internet, don't you think? Then she whines about someone sending those pics to her employer. Give me a break.

And if you would like to post a link to where I have ever posted personal information, please provide it. Otherwise, you might want to retract that slander.

This site has moderators calling posters pedophiles, awards being given to posters for posting copyrighted underage material, trolls wishing death and disease on other posters.

Are you all caught up now?
Click to expand...

#Imavictim
 
bronzeage said:
Laurel is the one person who can see all your current and previous user names. If she wants to ban you, she has a good reason. In the history of Lit, I haven't seen a ban which wasn't warranted.
Click to expand...

How do you know if it's warranted if she's the only one with the complete history? Nice non-statement.
 
ms_ann_thrope said:
Got it wrong as usual, Rob. There was no discussion. Funkensien posted a face av that was as horrendous as Warrior Queens. I stated my opinion that she had a lot of nerve calling WQ fugly, when in fact she is just as fugly. Then, in a snit Funk started posting selfies in which she did not remove the author signature from the pics. I pointed out to her her mistake and she volunteered that the embedded name was her actual name. I of course had no idea it was her real name, how would I? Funk was the one posting personal information, not me. Download a pic, right click and view the details tab. It's a rookie mistake for someone that likes to plaster their image all over the internet, don't you think? Then she whines about someone sending those pics to her employer. Give me a break.

And if you would like to post a link to where I have ever posted personal information, please provide it. Otherwise, you might want to retract that slander.

This site has moderators calling posters pedophiles, awards being given to posters for posting copyrighted underage material, trolls wishing death and disease on other posters.

Are you all caught up now?
Click to expand...

Nice rationalization(s).

You're as good as query at justifying your behavior, and almost as good as AJ.
 
ms_ann_thrope said:
How do you know if it's warranted if she's the only one with the complete history? Nice non-statement.
Click to expand...

I know it was warranted because I witnessed the public behavior which led to the ban. It's easy to forget that Lit is Laurel's party and we are invited guests.

It's not a very exclusive guest list, but when the hostess decides she is tired of the guy who pisses on the beer keg, it's time to go.

Appealing to the crowd with threads like this is pointless. They aren't the jury.
 
RobDownSouth said:
You were getting your ass kicked in a discussion, and you called someone by their real name.

The terms of service say not to do that, and you got your "final warning" about that, which indicates to me this isn't the first time you've done this.

Actions have consequences.
Click to expand...

Wrong.

Ann asked Funk who name was, and Funk said she was name. Then Funk started going off about how Ann was a troll etc.

Ann, you can't post names. Simple as that.

The whiners reported your post to Laurel, and that's the end of it.
 
girlsmiley said:
Wrong.

Ann asked Funk who name was, and funk said she was name. Then she started implying Ann was a troll etc.

Ann, you can't post names. Simple as that.

The whiners reported your post to Laurel, and that's the end of it.
Click to expand...

STFU Myrtle.
 
ms_ann_thrope said:
Got it wrong as usual, Rob. There was no discussion. Funkensien posted a face av that was as horrendous as Warrior Queens. I stated my opinion that she had a lot of nerve calling WQ fugly, when in fact she is just as fugly. Then, in a snit Funk started posting selfies in which she did not remove the author signature from the pics. I pointed out to her her mistake and she volunteered that the embedded name was her actual name. I of course had no idea it was her real name, how would I? Funk was the one posting personal information, not me. Download a pic, right click and view the details tab. It's a rookie mistake for someone that likes to plaster their image all over the internet, don't you think? Then she whines about someone sending those pics to her employer. Give me a break.

And if you would like to post a link to where I have ever posted personal information, please provide it. Otherwise, you might want to retract that slander.

This site has moderators calling posters pedophiles, awards being given to posters for posting copyrighted underage material, trolls wishing death and disease on other posters.

Are you all caught up now?
Click to expand...

Nice spin filed with lies and bullshit.

Stop whining. You haven't been banned so stfu. You are such a little bitch, what a victim .
 
bronzeage said:
I know it was warranted because I witnessed the public behavior which led to the ban. It's easy to forget that Lit is Laurel's party and we are invited guests.

It's not a very exclusive guest list, but when the hostess decides she is tired of the guy who pisses on the beer keg, it's time to go.

Appealing to the crowd with threads like this is pointless. They aren't the jury.
Click to expand...

I'm just stating the facts for the record because the facts are always the first fatality here. And you know full well that for someone whose only interest is to cause trouble, a ban only slows them down long enough to create a new account. It's symbolic at best. Do you really think I fit the mold of the general troll?

It's not a party. It's a porncentric business.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

J
I got banned from one more forum.
Replies
8
Views
612
JohnSm123
J
H
Need advice please
Replies
8
Views
298
Helpme01
H
D
Help required to find a recent story
Replies
1
Views
198
VinnyVeritas
V
scposteel
Q&A with a random guy on here.
Replies
0
Views
89
scposteel
scposteel
J
Omg! Now what?
Replies
18
Views
2K
gunhilltrain
gunhilltrain
Back
Top