COVID-19 RESOURCES
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Introducing ... the ENTIRE clitoris

For fox sake

OK just when I think I know a bit about how my wife is put together something else comes along, G spot, c spot internal and external orgasms, breasts and nipples, inner and outer, what is a man sposed to do?

And then there are the non sexual 'sensitive' areas, back of knee, the ear lobe, neck, back and side but different on each woman!!! some like it rough some gentle, some forced some like to do the forcing....

Girls just put together a manual that us guys can work with, nothing complicated and lots of pictures. :D
 
Green_Knight said:
...
The interesting thing is that this seems to support other suggestions that it is the first couple of inches of the vagina that are the most sensitive - the parts that are surrounded by the internal clit. The good news for us less well-endowed guys is that you actually only need three or four inches to do the business - though, in theory, the thicker the better so that it presses on the vag walls and stimulates the surrounding clit tissue.

So, sorry lads; those of you with 10 inch cocks just aren't going to cut the mustard, especially if they're thin.
Click to expand...
No woman needs their cervix or kidneys bashed. If you've got a biggy then you don't have to use it ALL! Maybe it gives you extra options positions-wise though?

Green_Knight said:
Taking things a stage further, if I've got my thoughts about anatomy right, the anus will come somewhere in the vicinity of the large bulbs shown on the model. Is this how some women are able to cum while having anal sex?
Click to expand...
Hmmm.. been thinking about this and even though the clitoris is bigger than we all thought, it doesn't mean the nerve endings are as profuse all-over: there are more in the tip. It all helps though huh? :) :)

phil_o said:
OK just when I think I know a bit about how my wife is put together something else comes along, G spot, c spot internal and external orgasms, breasts and nipples, inner and outer, what is a man sposed to do?

And then there are the non sexual 'sensitive' areas, back of knee, the ear lobe, neck, back and side but different on each woman!!! some like it rough some gentle, some forced some like to do the forcing....

Girls just put together a manual that us guys can work with, nothing complicated and lots of pictures. :D
Click to expand...
You're nearly there Phil... go on... so... we need kissed all over!! Make love to our bodies, not individual parts. Gah! Gotta love it when a guy makes that all-over connection then finishes off with the cherry to drive us over the edge
 
EdSim_Clitoris_anatomy.jpg
I guess this is the image people want.
 
infinity706 said:
EdSim_Clitoris_anatomy.jpg
I guess this is the image people want.
Click to expand...
That's so pretty!! Much nicer than that plastic dinosaur thing. :rose:

that put me in mind of those amazing underwater aliens in The Abyss
The-Abyss-NTI-alien-1.jpg


Here's the same diagram made underwater and without pokey nasty words
tumblr_odrhvnY7Ab1rx9ovro1_540.jpg


See?!?! :)
 
Last edited:
Hans101 said:
It is the duty of each of us to educate ourselves. The government isn't going to do it for us, nor should we expect it to.
Click to expand...

I agree that it is the duty of each of us to educate ourselves, but it's the duty of the schools to give us the tools to do it. That's what schools are for. And why any branch of knowledge should be so willfully ignored, particularly one that makes such an important contribution to our lives, is beyond me.
 
If you look up Dodson and Ross on Google they have a wonderful site on female sexuality. Ladies can learn about themselves and fellas can learn how to better pleasure your woman. I swear by it.
 
Gwanji16 said:
I love it! Won't be long before there is a Lego's clit kit!
Click to expand...

Remember when some plastic model company used to make "Visible Man" and "Visible Woman" kits? I can just imagine their "Visible Snatch" kit. A teaching tool for the 21st century.
 
jehoram said:
Remember when some plastic model company used to make "Visible Man" and "Visible Woman" kits? I can just imagine their "Visible Snatch" kit. A teaching tool for the 21st century.
Click to expand...

Crowd source that puppy!
 
KimGordon67 said:
I super-don't want this to tun into a political thread ... but when I pay taxes, education for my kids kind of is one of the things I expect. Admittedly, in the realm of sex ed, I actually think (informed) parents should be the first source of most knowledge, but given the variability of parental inclination to engage in this sort of thing, the state probably should step in at least a little, if for no reason than to ensure some consistency in the information kids are receiving. So until parents stop finding the idea of talking to their kids about sex mortifyingly embarrassing, then probably the state does need to step up a bit.
Click to expand...


Sometimes it appears as though there is a close correlation with those that don't want their children to receive any sex education in school and those who see it as a fundamental evil. In other words, they aren't arguing against who should inform their children or in what forum but the premise that they should be informed at all.

Recently I listened to a CBC interview of a man who opposed sex ed in school. He just kept repeating that damaging things shouldn't be introduced to our children until they are old enough. If he was christian, the interviewer would have questioned why he regards awareness of sexuality as damaging. But his ethnicity was Indian (religious affiliation unknown) so the interviewer never really grilled him. Sorry to say, but that says something about our PC media who will put a christian through the wringer but gloss over the most facile statement from another faith. Christians should be judged by their hostile actions not the peaceful words of their faith......whereas others should be judged by the peaceful words of their faith and not their hostile actions.

........but I digress.........

Unless you have a cave dwelling in which to raise your children the rationale choice isn't sexual knowledge or no sexual knowledge but the means through which it is obtained.
 
SlutAddicted said:
Sometimes it appears as though there is a close correlation with those that don't want their children to receive any sex education in school and those who see it as a fundamental evil. In other words, they aren't arguing against who should inform their children or in what forum but the premise that they should be informed at all.

Unless you have a cave dwelling in which to raise your children the rationale choice isn't sexual knowledge or no sexual knowledge but the means through which it is obtained.
Click to expand...

These two points are my primary concern. As I think I said above (or maybe not - I can't the whole thread right now, and can't remember if I made this point earlier), in the absence of any other information, kids are going to get their sex ed from the interweb ... yay! [Very deep level of sarcasm there.] Admittedly not all parents know quite how problematic that could be, but I very much see my job as a parent to ensure that my kid has a good grounding in what consensual, mutually enjoyable sex is about, hopefully before he's introduced to hardcore porn. Again, I don't think porn, nor most of the things (with some definite exceptions) depicted in porn are inherently 'bad', but I also don't think teenagers should think anal double DPs or bukake are 'standard practice'.
 
Why is sex regarded as a minefield in terms of education? You send kids to school to learn, period. If sex is taught with the same balance and depth as say, Geography, then by placing it in the curriculum, it stops it becoming a forbidden, secret subject. Giving children the facts, in an educational context, well away from any parental bias, equips them with the means to judge if anal is right or wrong or if watching porn is a socially acceptable past-time.
If that makes parents embarrassed, then obviously they are part of the problem: their children will be frightened to speak to them if they have some sex-related problem, because they already know their parents don't like to talk about it. How stupid is that? Then parents will find their children are keeping secrets from them and so perpetuating the whole sex-ignorance problem. It's a type of control, information control, that has been used by people in positions of authority since the cavemen and you can't put the internet back in the bottle and pretend it's not there.
 
stickygirl said:
Why is sex regarded as a minefield in terms of education? You send kids to school to learn, period. If sex is taught with the same balance and depth as say, Geography, then by placing it in the curriculum, it stops it becoming a forbidden, secret subject. Giving children the facts, in an educational context, well away from any parental bias, equips them with the means to judge if anal is right or wrong or if watching porn is a socially acceptable past-time.
If that makes parents embarrassed, then obviously they are part of the problem: their children will be frightened to speak to them if they have some sex-related problem, because they already know their parents don't like to talk about it. How stupid is that? Then parents will find their children are keeping secrets from them and so perpetuating the whole sex-ignorance problem. It's a type of control, information control, that has been used by people in positions of authority since the cavemen and you can't put the internet back in the bottle and pretend it's not there.
Click to expand...

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/aug/31/channel-4-miss-belgium-shake-up-sex-education

Sadly, I don't think the idea has made much progress in the last two years.
 
Orgasmic Female Ejaculation

I've read where some discount the ability for a female to ejaculate at the point of orgasm. I "squirt" during a strong intense orgasm. My hubby says my ejaculate is a thicker consistency, milky white liquid that literally floods out of my vagina. By the way he loves the flavor.

My "squirt" is not urine. It is not the color, odor, or taste of urine. Where is female ejaculate emitted from? I'm not sure, but the mix of cum and lubrication from my pussy drives my husband wild when he tastes me.

I do agree orgasm is the best feeling a female can experience❤️❤️❤️❤️
 
Z924M said:
I've read where some discount the ability for a female to ejaculate at the point of orgasm. I "squirt" during a strong intense orgasm. My hubby says my ejaculate is a thicker consistency, milky white liquid that literally floods out of my vagina. By the way he loves the flavor.

My "squirt" is not urine. It is not the color, odor, or taste of urine. Where is female ejaculate emitted from? I'm not sure, but the mix of cum and lubrication from my pussy drives my husband wild when he tastes me.

I do agree orgasm is the best feeling a female can experience❤️❤️❤️❤️
Click to expand...
Skene's gland - google it. :)
I think the liquid kinda builds up in the vagina and then when you O and all the muscles tense up, then fadouch!
 
stickygirl said:
Breath-taking that so many women are ignorant of their own body... and sexual arousal during breast-feeding :rolleyes: No shit :)
Click to expand...

Breath-taking, but sadly predictable. And again, it comes back to sex ed, and lack of parental input, and then the wider social silence around women's sexual pleasure, because ... well, women. I'm working wit someone at the moment who's doing work on sexuality and your equivalent of 'freshmen' living in your equivalent of dorms. The guys are alarmingly under-informed. However, I had to admit I'm quite heartened by the fact that the girls are a bit more knowledgeable than I would have been at that age, and also a bit less inclined to put up with the guys' lack of considerations.
 
stickygirl said:
Skene's gland - google it. :)
I think the liquid kinda builds up in the vagina and then when you O and all the muscles tense up, then fadouch!
Click to expand...
I deeply hope that "Fadouch!" is adopted as the official technical term for the sound in question.
 
KimGordon67 said:
Breath-taking, but sadly predictable. And again, it comes back to sex ed, and lack of parental input, and then the wider social silence around women's sexual pleasure, because ... well, women. I'm working wit someone at the moment who's doing work on sexuality and your equivalent of 'freshmen' living in your equivalent of dorms. The guys are alarmingly under-informed. However, I had to admit I'm quite heartened by the fact that the girls are a bit more knowledgeable than I would have been at that age, and also a bit less inclined to put up with the guys' lack of considerations.
Click to expand...

For those seeking more knowledge - and a bit more breath-taking lack of knowledge:
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeand...ina-dispatches-part-one-what-vulvas-look-like
 
Last edited:
Green_Knight said:
For those seeking more knowledge - and a bit more breath-taking lack of knowledge:
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeand...ina-dispatches-part-one-what-vulvas-look-like
Click to expand...
Thanks for the link
Maybe it comes down to whether you need a mirror to see your sex organs or can flop them out on the table?! I don't know where our stigmas start with regards vulvas and vaginas: in childhood? I've been able to come at it without such childhood baggage and had to approach the whole thing in a very practical way, hence a ceratin amount of scientific/medical knowledge. I have an interest in such things, but why do women know more about how to treat their hair? It all seems to 19th century.
There was one trans-faceplant in the video, when the presenter questionned why vaginal depth was an issue with trans women ( and not health ). What the interviewee didn't respond with was that without depth, the surgical work begins to shrink and simply won't stretch in the way a natural vagina does. Still, I was impressed she was included. :)
 
KimGordon67 said:
These two points are my primary concern. As I think I said above (or maybe not - I can't the whole thread right now, and can't remember if I made this point earlier), in the absence of any other information, kids are going to get their sex ed from the interweb ... yay! [Very deep level of sarcasm there.] Admittedly not all parents know quite how problematic that could be, but I very much see my job as a parent to ensure that my kid has a good grounding in what consensual, mutually enjoyable sex is about, hopefully before he's introduced to hardcore porn. Again, I don't think porn, nor most of the things (with some definite exceptions) depicted in porn are inherently 'bad', but I also don't think teenagers should think anal double DPs or bukake are 'standard practice'.
Click to expand...


When I was growing up I think my parents still believed in the premise that our household and the society in which we existed could be sheltered from certain realities. Or at least that awareness could be deferred into adulthood. Not only did avoidance of sex and drugs leave me unprepared for what was to come but even when the topics arose adopting a simplistic scaremongering perspective meant their credibility was undermined for when I really needed it. And I think that as a guy I had it easy compared to my sister.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

DrHappy
Female Trimmed Pubic hair: Gap over the clitoris?
2 3
Replies
59
Views
9K
womaneater58
W
C
Question About (a Lack of) Stockings
Replies
7
Views
471
LL_RS
LL_RS
HotDamn_
Sex is everywhere nowadays!
Replies
4
Views
571
jehoram
jehoram
Stopokochac
What do you think of this scenario? Was this woman an exhibitionist?
Replies
15
Views
2K
KatieDoes
KatieDoes
N
Sex Club Experiences : would you go back
2
Replies
28
Views
3K
parrot454
P
Back
Top