Who doesn't love a big cock…?

DarkUniverse said:

Agreed, agreed! Same here. I actually like it when my partner is well-endowed. And I'm not the worlds tallest woman, neither can I take a 9 or 10 inch cock inside in full length. However I do enjoy such men and I'm not the only one.
So also from my experience - "bottoming out" and "hitting the cervix" is definitely not nonsense, but reality. (Sigh - maybe some people on this site need a few more lessons in anatomy...)
But back to the topic of this thread - I wouldn't mind such criticizing nerds at all. Write what you like and what turns you on - there will be at least some people who'll like it and those who don't can anytime look for another stories - this site is full of them. You have at least my attention for sure. Who said size doesn't matter? I think it was not a woman - because it does.

Click to expand...

So what happens when you meet a guy who has all the right attributes you find attractive and then you get to the bedroom and find out he doesn't completely live up to your expectations? I'm not being a smart-ass here, I'm just curious. Could you be satisfied with a partner who doesn't have a big cock?

DarkUniverse said:

Agreed, agreed! Same here. I actually like it when my partner is well-endowed. And I'm not the worlds tallest woman, neither can I take a 9 or 10 inch cock inside in full length. However I do enjoy such men and I'm not the only one.
So also from my experience - "bottoming out" and "hitting the cervix" is definitely not nonsense, but reality. (Sigh - maybe some people on this site need a few more lessons in anatomy...)
But back to the topic of this thread - I wouldn't mind such criticizing nerds at all. Write what you like and what turns you on - there will be at least some people who'll like it and those who don't can anytime look for another stories - this site is full of them. You have at least my attention for sure. Who said size doesn't matter? I think it was not a woman - because it does.

Click to expand...

At last, thank you DarkUniverse, an admittance that "size does matter!" Indeed, it is wanted and welcome! The whole premise of my story Big Cock Fantasy is based on the fact that the heroine/wife becomes fascinated, curious and obsessive about trying an exceptionally-sized dick. Interwoven are various scenes and characters which are not at all reliant on the big cock syndrome. But the questions remain: Where to find such a cock? Will she cheat on her husband? Will it live up to the fantasy? And, if she does commit adultery, what then?
Finally, would the story be written if the lady was in search of a small penis?

I don't know of any story written with small cocks in mind. Small breasts? Sure, why not. Many men are into that. (I'm not, but some men are.) But I have yet to read about any fictional woman - or even hear of a woman in real life - who prefers small cocks. We're not silverback gorillas, where one inch is plenty.

Of course, I've also read stories where the men are almost cartoonishly hung. (Yes, 10" isn't unrealistic, but when you can guarantee that the male lead is packing one that's almost as long as a Subway sandwich, that's a little unrealistic.) Simply saying the guy is hung without giving a number is fine.

That isn't universal, though. My specialty is Interracial (white male, black female) and there's a certain expectation of "that white boy had better be hung like a stallion if that hot black girl (who most definitely has big breasts and a huge ass) is even giving him the time of day."

MrRandyWatson said:

Of course, I've also read stories where the men are almost cartoonishly hung. (Yes, 10" isn't unrealistic, but when you can guarantee that the male lead is packing one that's almost as long as a Subway sandwich, that's a little unrealistic.) Simply saying the guy is hung without giving a number is fine.

Click to expand...

When it comes to creating arousal in a story, realism isn't the number one element. Apparently some here can't recognize that--and seem to want to keep others from realizing it as well.

sr71plt said:

When it comes to creating arousal in a story, realism isn't the number one element. Apparently some here can't recognize that--and seem to want to keep others from realizing it as well.

Click to expand...

There's a difference between stretching realism and being cartoonish.

MrRandyWatson said:

There's a difference between stretching realism and being cartoonish.

Click to expand...

Yes, but if you've had any real expansive experience with cocks, you will know that ten inches exists and isn't cartoonish. Thirteen inches would be cartoonish--but when employed in fantasy, even that could be well within the bounds of legitimately evoking arousal--the point of erotica.

I wasn't disagreeing with what you posted--but some posters to this thread are so clinical and anal retentive in their approach to erotica that I must observe that they don't know much about what erotica is intended to do--and makes me wonder why they read on a porn site in the first place.

sr71plt said:

Yes, but if you've had any real expansive experience with cocks, you will know that ten inches exists and isn't cartoonish. Thirteen inches would be cartoonish--but when employed in fantasy, even that could be well within the bounds of legitimately evoking arousal--the point of erotica.

I wasn't disagreeing with what you posted--but some posters to this thread are so clinical and anal retentive in their approach to erotica that I must observe that they don't know much about what erotica is intended to do--and makes me wonder why they read on a porn site in the first place.

Click to expand...

It's not just erotica where this issue irritates me. It gets on my nerves sometimes when I watch porn as well. It's just so overblown, and it just becomes monotonous. Most of the stories that irritate me are written as though the male characters are just a walking penis. For me, the physicality of sex is secondary to the mentality of it. I prefer to focus on the circumstances surrounding an encounter than just reading about a big cock filling a tiny hole. I mean obviously, sex feels good physically. A woman can have an orgasm just by rubbing herself with a single finger. That's not what I'm interested in when I'm reading erotica, though. I can't feel or see how good she feels, so what the hell do I care how wonderful she feels to be stretched out by a giant wang? It's the same thing as when they describe how insanely tight a pussy/asshole is. What the hell do I care for? It isn't my cock in that pussy. Sex is about more than just genitals. All I'm saying it that it gets boring and for me, the lack of realism is just distracting.

SWIM21 said:

It's not just erotica where this issue irritates me. It gets on my nerves sometimes when I watch porn as well. It's just so overblown, and it just becomes monotonous. Most of the stories that irritate me are written as though the male characters are just a walking penis. For me, the physicality of sex is secondary to the mentality of it. I prefer to focus on the circumstances surrounding an encounter than just reading about a big cock filling a tiny hole. I mean obviously, sex feels good physically. A woman can have an orgasm just by rubbing herself with a single finger. That's not what I'm interested in when I'm reading erotica, though. I can't feel or see how good she feels, so what the hell do I care how wonderful she feels to be stretched out by a giant wang? It's the same thing as when they describe how insanely tight a pussy/asshole is. What the hell do I care for? It isn't my cock in that pussy. Sex is about more than just genitals. All I'm saying it that it gets boring and for me, the lack of realism is just distracting.

Click to expand...

Well, then, there are plenty of stories here for you to read--and plenty left over for those who have these arousal buttons to read. I'm sure you can just read what you like and not impose your likes on others here. You can, can't you?

Size of packages IMHO

As with all the other replies this is my opinion and not meant to be drogatory or detract from what you like/write. I have been on this site for a bit over a year and in many of the stories the main characters are Adonis/Aphrodite based on the description. He is hung like a horse and she has tits that would stun a water buffalo at 50 yards. There are people like that out there but after a while I find that it detracts from the story.

As several mentioned when you start breaking out the numbers (ten inches and as big around as your wrist) the story will start to lose interest for me. I have a number of stories I have submitted and very few of my characters are perfect specimens. They all have some sort of imperfection be it something about their body, emotions, or intellect. I do this because even though I tend to write the sci-fi/fantasy categories I still want something approaching real life in my stories.

Again this is IMHO and I haven't read any of your stories so I am directing this towards my opinion and nothing else. As far as the detractors I have only come across one comment in my stories that really caused me to go up in flames. The individual took the time to read a number of chapters of the story just so he/she could tear it apart. He/she called my main character a closet pedo and homo as well as a few other things. It was obvious that he/she was vomiting their own nerosis out in the appearance of attacking my stories. Oh and it didn't have the balls/ovaries to use their username and did it anonymously.

Oh, I write a great variety of writing techniques. And I write them for my appreciation, not because someone posts to the forum what they want to read and/or what should be posted to the site. And, in that vein, I also just let others write and read what interests them. It's only when they start to instruct us here what we should write/read that I comment.

MrRandyWatson said:

I don't know of any story written with small cocks in mind. Small breasts? Sure, why not. Many men are into that. (I'm not, but some men are.) But I have yet to read about any fictional woman - or even hear of a woman in real life - who prefers small cocks. We're not silverback gorillas, where one inch is plenty.

Click to expand...

My story Breaking in the Pledges features a male lead with a small cock. The story has multiple favorites, is rated over 4.6, and no one complained about the character having a small dick. And yes he gets laid, a lot.

MrRandyWatson said:

There's a difference between stretching realism and being cartoonish.

Click to expand...

And some people want to read something that ends up being cartoonish, there are plenty of stories on this site that prove that. I personally prefer a little realism to my stories but if cartoonish fit the story then so be it. There's nothing wrong with people wanting to completely escape into the fantasy of cartoonish because it's their fantasy.

SWIM21 said:

It's not just erotica where this issue irritates me. It gets on my nerves sometimes when I watch porn as well. It's just so overblown, and it just becomes monotonous. Most of the stories that irritate me are written as though the male characters are just a walking penis. For me, the physicality of sex is secondary to the mentality of it. I prefer to focus on the circumstances surrounding an encounter than just reading about a big cock filling a tiny hole. I mean obviously, sex feels good physically. A woman can have an orgasm just by rubbing herself with a single finger. That's not what I'm interested in when I'm reading erotica, though. I can't feel or see how good she feels, so what the hell do I care how wonderful she feels to be stretched out by a giant wang? It's the same thing as when they describe how insanely tight a pussy/asshole is. What the hell do I care for? It isn't my cock in that pussy. Sex is about more than just genitals. All I'm saying it that it gets boring and for me, the lack of realism is just distracting.

Click to expand...

There is a saying in BDSM circles, "Your kink is not my kink." Basically don't force what you want on everyone else. There are plenty of stories on this site that cater to what you want, but there are also plenty of stories that cater to readers and authors who want something else. Just as in porn, some people want the girl who's caked in makeup performing sexual feats that are highly uncomfortable in real life with guys who are overly endowed. It's a fantasy and it's some people's fantasy, so lay off and let them enjoy it.

Like pilot, I generally take a live and let live approach to people's stories. Everyone has something that turns them on and so long as it's allowed here I could care less what it specifically is. Just means I may not read it. It gets annoying though, when people specifically expect every story to cater to their exacting wants. Your kink is not my kink, your desired story is not mine.

As to the question of placing exact measurements into the text of a story, I would say sparingly and judiciously would be the way to go. You can be sneaky by adding visual cues by describing other, non-sexual objects which are in the scene as well for comparison. Try placing yourself in the scene and then look around to see what you might see. You'd be amazed what kind of props you'll think of which give you (the author) more control over the story while still allowing the reader's imagination to fill in the specifics.

I'm just a dilettante in the field of erotic storytelling, so take any thoughts or advice I offer with a huge grain of salt.

ADDED: First and foremost decide who you are writing for: yourself, or a target audience. I write for myself and no one else. If others enjoy my writing, great! But if they do not, oh well.

sr71plt said:

Well, then, there are plenty of stories here for you to read--and plenty left over for those who have these arousal buttons to read. I'm sure you can just read what you like and not impose your likes on others here. You can, can't you?

Click to expand...

I'm not trying to impose my likes on anyone. I can't make anyone else like something I like, nor am I trying to. I'm simply answering the original question of this thread - "Who doesn't love a big cock?" And it's not that I have so much of a problem with big cocks either. It's just frustrating that so many stories seem to rely on physical attributes to carry the dynamics between their characters.

I'll give you an example of what I'm talking about, and that's the last I'm going to say about the topic. My personal favorite category is incest/taboo. I'm sure there are plenty of people who are grossed out that such a category even exists, but like JagFarlane said, "Your kink is not my kink". Anyway, in that category in particular, what gets on my nerves is when the sister/mother/aunt/etc. character sees the male character's junk and then all of a sudden that's all they can think about and is apparently enough for them to break societal taboo. It's cheap and unoriginal, yet its not so much that the main character has a big cock that gets on my nerves, its that the importance of it is elevated to such a ridiculous level.

However, on the other hand, I also like the transsexual/crossdresser category, specifically stories where straight guys are seduced/dominated by big cock trannies. In this scenario, the fact that the straight guy becomes entranced by a t-girl's huge penis is an insight into the conflict in his sexuality, which I find interesting and erotic. It also ties in with dominance/submission themes, thus extending the significance of penis size beyond just the ability to provide more physical pleasure (although in these stories, bigger cock size usually results in more pain than pleasure). Anyway, that's my two cents. I'm not trying to impose my views on anyone, though. This is a discussion, after all. You are allowed to have and communicate an opposing view in a discussion.

Why do I feel that the one who began this thread is trying to make a blanket rule for all the females?

If you like big cocks, fine. If it is a main source for your turn-on fantasies, fine.

Just DON'T, I repeat, DON'T try to impose your fantasy on everyone.

I necessarily don't visualise a big, fat monster pounding into someone's pussy when I read a story. I like to keep it in plausible proportions.

And talking about big being pleasurable, it's true only for a certain limit because after that, it hurts them. Bump into your girlfriend's cervix, and you'll know what a banshee is - firsthand.

It also depends on the size of the vagina, scientifically speaking. Not all women have big-sized cooters to accomodate a BFC.

Those with small vaginas will always prefer average or shorter dicks. BFCs will scare the hell out of them.

And your axiom of Men being jealous also sounds like a blanket rule for all of those around us. Why should I ever be jealous in the first place?

I know I'm not lacking. I know I'm great in bed. I know that if my GF gets fucked by those XXL cocks and enjoys it, I know that it's only the sex. She doesn't hang around with me only for the sex.

Sex is waaaaay down on the list of the girls I met and had the pleasure of being friends with. Intellect, humor, confidence are some of the things that they look for in a men.

I do have a question for that user, though.

You influenced by the LW category here in Lit?

If you are, then I don't know what else to say to convince your fantasy-addled brain.

Yeah, I think the OP does try to impose--and that most of the responses have just tried to impose something else of personal preference.

I'm surprised this thread doesn't have any pics & gifs yet:

Mello_SixtyNine said:

I'm surprised this thread doesn't have any pics & gifs yet:

Click to expand...

Aren't these pictures violating the pic posting rule?

(E) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.

And I think apparently this is not the first time you're breaking rules. You have been warned by Laurel before.

Please take it down.

TheSoulfulBard said:

Aren't these pictures violating the pic posting rule?

(E) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.

And I think apparently this is not the first time you're breaking rules. You have been warned by Laurel before.

Please take it down.

Click to expand...

Yep, and obnoxiously out of place in this area of the forum--but the Web site pretty much ignores its own rules on this.

sr71plt said:

Yep, and obnoxiously out of place in this area of the forum--but the Web site pretty much ignores its own rules on this.

Click to expand...

Did not realize this was the rule since the boards are filled with hardcore pics. The giftastic thread alone on the general board is over 188 pages for example. Hell, my avatar technically breaks the rule too and yet I had no problem getting that approved when I first submitted it.

The one time I got a warning was when I first learned to post pics. (I was uploading pics from my hardrive instead of hotlinking).

Also, how can this be out of place when this a thread specifically about big dicks?

Mello_SixtyNine said:

Did not realize this was the rule since the boards are filled with hardcore pics. The giftastic thread alone on the general board is over 188 pages for example.

Click to expand...

No worries!

At least, you took it down.

Mello_SixtyNine said:

The one time I got a warning was when I first learned to post pics. (I was uploading pics from my hardrive instead of hotlinking).

Click to expand...

Eh, I think I saw a nude celeb pic posting thread. The only thing I saw was the first page full of the mod's warning regarding copywright violitions.

TheSoulfulBard said:

No worries!

At least, you took it down.



Eh, I think I saw a nude celeb pic posting thread. The only thing I saw was the first page full of the mod's warning regarding copywright violitions.

Click to expand...

That was it. I guess uploading the pics to the literotica servers is a no-no worthy of getting a warning. I even asked what the correct way of doing it was. I assumed the hotlinking was correct since I didn't get any other warnings since.

Mello_SixtyNine said:

That was it. I guess uploading the pics to the literotica servers is a no-no worthy of getting a warning. I even asked what the correct way of doing it was. I assumed the hotlinking was correct since I didn't get any other warnings since.

Click to expand...

Laurel says hotlinking is OK (although the forum rules says it isn't). That's sort of irrelevant though. A copyright violation is reposting the material, not how you reposted it. (Obviously the Web site doesn't understand what a copyright violation is.)I believe the rules on images also specifically says nothing as graphic as what you posted (or you avatar, for that matter). But, as I posted, the Web site does practically nothing to enforce it's own rules in this regard.

Mello_SixtyNine said:

That was it. I guess uploading the pics to the literotica servers is a no-no worthy of getting a warning. I even asked what the correct way of doing it was. I assumed the hotlinking was correct since I didn't get any other warnings since.

Click to expand...

1) Attachments. These are user-owned images which are uploaded to our server by users. All attachments must meet our guidelines or they will be removed if brought to our attention. Any account may be suspended for repeated violations.

I think you can upload your pics to Lit server, if it meets all of its guidelines.

- Legally, we can allow soft nudity, but under current United States law, photographs (does not apply to non- photographic images) posted on this site may not contain "sexually explicit conduct", which the government defines as:

- Actual or simulated:
(A) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital , oral- genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;
(B) bestiality;
(C) masturbation;
(D) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(E) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.

This was the problem I had with your earlier post

- You must have a legal right from the copyright owner to post any images - i.e. photographs/drawings that you yourself created and/or have a license or other permission to post.

Your celeb pic posting thread was violating this guideline. The site can get sued because of that.

Anyways, I've preached enough. You can post pictures, keeping the guidelines in mind. They can be found here.

I don't mind people posting erotic pictures, as long as they follow the guidelines

I've been avoiding this thread--I don't quite know why--but then decided to sit down and read it all through last night.

Well, I like big cocks (please don't take that as an invitation to PM me a picture of yours), and I put them in stories. Most of my male characters are normally endowed, but a few have big ones. For example, a bad guy who uses his as a weapon, and a consensual slave who's a happy outsized dildo for several women.

What I don't do much of is measurements. I think this is because of the way my brain is organized: "ten-inch cock" just doesn't give me much of a picture. For the same reason I don't do bra or other sizes (waistlines, shirt collars, even body heights). I'm sympathetic if some readers prefer that kind of description, of course, but it just doesn't speak to me.

One useful way this thread could go (if it's not going to become a discussion of site policy on copyright and posting pictures) might be to talk a bit more about how to depict size.

I actually had to check to remember how I introduced big cocks--it was a bit of a surprise. I made other characters describe or react to them. For example, a prostitute (a present-tense narrator--sorry!) gets her first look at one belonging to a character who's going to give her a good bit of trouble: "He got a big cock, biggest I ever seen, and it gettin' bigger every second, it a scary thing. I stare at it and say..." Later you get scattered details regarding curve, thickness (how wide you have to open up to suck it), and skin tone.

In another story a young woman stares and says "It's really big" in an awed whisper. It's part of her characterization more than that of the male character: she turns out to be something of a size queen.

So, folks: how do you describe a big cock, if not with numbers?

Chris immediately wanted to know about cock sizes.

"Oh, I whipped out my laser-calibrated cock-measuring device—I never travel without it—and John was 6.354 inches, Matt was—"

"Ha, ha; very funny," Chris deadpanned. "Just a general idea, that's all, Catherine."

"Alright: Matt's cock was similar to John's but was cut. I would call them both average in terms of size—like you," I added a little mean-spiritedly. "However, Brian, I noticed, was very well hung."

Chris oozed with enthusiasm and prodded me for details. I picked up [the vibrator] from between my legs, held it up and said, "Brian's was similar to this, only his had a delectable upward curve, although I didn't know that quite yet."