Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You should just email the person (through their account feedback) and tell them to stop doing it.
Well, yes, yesterday someone unfavorited a seven-chapter story--each chapter. They apparently had favorited each chapter some time in the past. It raised the question of "If you did this to mark it to read in the future, why not just the first chapter?" followed by the thought "Do you not realize that you don't have a finite number of story favorites--that you don't have to weed them out periodically?" And then I just shrugged and moved on. I don't expect the Web site to do anything about this.
You should just email the person (through their account feedback) and tell them to stop doing it.
on my story.
No reaction from Laurel.
Anyone else?
People here were talking about "pookaciousone" doing a lot of fav/unfaving
For the hell of it I'll toss this one out there.
Anyone get a reader named 'umbercide' doing the same thing? He;s the only other one that stands out to me.
And really what I wanted to know is whether or not there is some sort of impact to the story. For example, the two stories he concentrated on no longer appear on the top 100 lesbian list even though from a score perspective they should, it seems to me. One has a score of 4.81 with 431 votes and the other 4.80 with 244. Both used to be there, but aren't anymore. I don't know the algorithm that drives the list and was curious if the campaign of repeated favoriting and unfavoriting might impact it.
On this subject, I just now had 36 stories unfavorited at one go by the same reader. (Anyone else able to beat this massacre number?) I saw it coming, though, as they were all favorited in one swoop just yesterday. Don't think it was malicious, though, as the reader as favorited other stories of mine over a long period of time that didn't get the ax (at least yet).
That's an unrelated glitch. The top-N lists are ranked by average score, apparently with vote count as a tie-breaker, and restricted to stories that have at least a certain number of votes (for Lesbian this is 100).
However, the top-50 page for Lesbian hasn't updated in a long time, so stories between around 4.79 and 4.83 may not show up there where they should. (All the other pages for that category seem to be updating OK, including the top-25 - so the #1 story showing there is different from the one on the top-50.)
Still beats incest.
If you click on the incest hub the top 25 all time incest stories seems current-there are some from 2014 in it-but when you click the list for "more incest hall of fame" it defaults back to a list that at this point is over two years old.
One of mine is somewhere in the top 50 with a little over 2k votes. That story now has over 4k
My assumption is the small glimpse given in the hub works because they recently did some work on those. The main list must be 'old code' or whatever.
My point of course is this has been mentioned innumerable times and on more than one occasion we've had laurel post "looking into it'
I mean why would anyone want the top list for the largest viewed category on the site to actually function?
certainly not the same handful of authors who have been locked into the top spots all this time.
Meanwhile an author named Beachbum should have 5 of the top ten spots-and does on the short list-but is nowhere in site on the main one because his stories are from this year.
However, the top-50 page for Lesbian hasn't updated in a long time, so stories between around 4.79 and 4.83 may not show up there where they should. (All the other pages for that category seem to be updating OK, including the top-25 - so the #1 story showing there is different from the one on the top-50.)
The All-Time/HOF list for GM seems to function okay too, and the stories I currently have at #37 and #137 rarely display different total vote numbers than what's on my author control panel...and even if they do, it's only for a few hours at the worst.
But the ongoing (since early this year anyway) strange one, is different vote totals for the same stories on the 30 day and 12 month portions of the same top lists. Usually it's 3 or 4 or 5 easily noticed votes extra. And they stay that way, so it's not "questionable" votes awaiting a regular sweep, but rather 3-4-5 that have been swept from only the All Time list, and/or on the author control panel numbers. I don't care since I am just happy to have a decent presence in the three sections of the HOF at all...but it does make you go: "Huh??"
I don't think any systems notification is involved. It just gives them a memory jog on who and what they've enjoyed reading.
I don't think any systems notification is involved. It just gives them a memory jog on who and what they've enjoyed reading.
Does my face look blue?Lots of updates have been mentioned as coming "soon." I hope you aren't holding your breath for "soon" to arrive.
Does my face look blue?
That function was mentioned by Laurel as coming in some form in a future system update, but no timetable has been provided.
We've discussed this with readers and watched users, and feel that this activity is not trolling. People are using the Favorites list as a "to read" list. They Favorite stories to keep track of ones they wish to read. Once they read them, they are removed from the list.
The upgrade to the logged in user panel will provide a "Reading" list to which readers may file their stories, along with the current "Favorites" list, and also the ability for users to make separate custom public or private lists.