Maybe you can take what you had for this one and "spin" it towards V-day, that way its partially done.
Perhaps... something for me to think about anyway...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe you can take what you had for this one and "spin" it towards V-day, that way its partially done.
Yes, it is. It's a story and situation you haven't written before. It might be a prequel or sequel, it might even be separate story that could fit into an "open" time period in the original story. So long as you do not need that original story to read the new story, then it's a stand alone and qualifies.
What if the story sucks? Then is it riding prior success? Presumably people will either vote it low or not vote at all if it's bad. Because the issue is the rating, not the views.
It takes skill and is an interesting exercise to use characters from previous stories in later ones. I often have characters appear from another story. It's an added "interest point" for regular readers of my work, as it is if I include even essentially the same scene or setting as I've used before, except seen from a different perspective and set in a story with a different theme. Since I'm using them like I would any new character or new scene in a different standalone story, they don't intrude on the reading by readers who haven't read the earlier stories. The latter is what makes them standalone stories. They don't require any preknowledge on anything from previous stories.
To your first part, simple difference of opinion. Revisiting existing people/premises for a contest is a bit of a cop out. Again, my opinion.
Second part, well if it sucked before not sure why you would try again, but maybe at that point the author likes the characters.
But if it had some success, then the author is now bringing a "fan base" to the next installment.
How is it a cop out when you have a new and different idea for those characters that you haven't addressed before?
Actually, I meant what if the new story sucked, even if the original story didn't.
Isn't the author doing that, or possibly doing that, just by being the author? We've all talked about name recognition from time to time, and how readers will find you, etc. Many of us, no doubt, have had people say things to the effect of "Glad to see something new from you," which indicates we have some fans. If bringing a "fan base" to the contest is a problem, then should we all submit anonymously?
Isn't the author doing that, or possibly doing that, just by being the author? We've all talked about name recognition from time to time, and how readers will find you, etc. Many of us, no doubt, have had people say things to the effect of "Glad to see something new from you," which indicates we have some fans. If bringing a "fan base" to the contest is a problem, then should we all submit anonymously?
It's not a bad idea, but so many people would work around it ( especially in the age of Twitter, Facebook, Tumbler, etc. ) that it would be almost pointless to try to run a contest anonymous.
You could make the argument that someone who writes a lot of incest shouldn't be allowed to write incest in a contest, because they're bringing their fanbase. Or maybe they're not allowed to write anything romantic because they write a lot of romances. Casual sex only for you in a contest!
It goes on and on. The only people who aren't bringing a fanbase to the table are those posting their first story to a contest. Even if you write something completely different than what you usually write, you're still bringing your fanbase to the table.
That's what makes them fans.
You can write about your "favs" all year long. There are 6 themed contests and the point of a contest with a theme is to stretch yourself as an author.
But in a contest I think its about doing something different not "Okay Bill and Kate do V-day then nude day then earth day, then Halloween.
It's not a bad idea, but so many people would work around it ( especially in the age of Twitter, Facebook, Tumbler, etc. ) that it would be almost pointless to try to run a contest anonymous.
It goes on and on. The only people who aren't bringing a fanbase to the table are those posting their first story to a contest. Even if you write something completely different than what you usually write, you're still bringing your fanbase to the table.
That's what makes them fans.
The old Last Place trophy was a way of poking fun at ourselves. I don't think many of the new people around would find it funny. They take things way to seriously.
This message is hidden because scouries is on your ignore list.
And i imagine the biggest whiner of all is still stirring the pot.
Like SR said, quit taking this shit seriously. If you win, you win. If you don't, at least try and have some fun at it.
The old Last Place trophy was a way of poking fun at ourselves. I don't think many of the new people around would find it funny. They take things way to seriously.
Who said anything about winning?
I'm discussing the "chapter" rule.
As someone else said, when there are 90 or so entries odds are you're not winning.
Add to that trolls and an imperfect voting system along with other games, odds aren't in your favor.
But, having said that "its not about winning" is not an attitude I enter anything with.
I'm not saying a person is a loser for losing, but starting anything with, "I know I can't ever win but.... is a loser mentality.
Most people enter with at least a hope of winning.
I've never set out to lose anything, I sure as well don;t always win everything, but the day I decide I've lost before I enter then its not worth entering, that goes for anything.
But why not just get to the real point here. Its not about winning losing or whining, its about having the audacity to talk about a rule and what defines "original.
So as always the "big three" have to come out swinging. You, Pilot and Dark think you run this site.
At least PL whether she agrees or not always remains unbiased
Try it sometime
This a lot of rancor for three stories that are so unlikely to actually win that you would think that smeone of Lovecraft's stature would just ignore them. I must be doing something right because I am pissng off big shots. Either that or the big shot in question feels the need to elevate himself by trashing the efforts of beginners.
I'd take my stories out of contention right now except I don't think cyberbullies deserve to get their way. I think Mr. Lovecraft is little better than Scouries in this respect. Don't worry Lovecraft, I won't challenge you with my serial fiction in the future. These contests aren't worth the bullshit. Sir, you may be a superior writer, but you clearly are a supreme asshole.
Wow. This thread started with me taking hell from sticking my neck out and defending an idea of LC's. Now it turns to him going after my husband. Last time I bother doing anything like that for the cutthroats around here. Laurel saw fit to put them all in the contest as separate and equally qualified entries. That is all that should matter and be the end of the discussion. As he said, funny that you seem so threatened by a beginner being able to carry over an audience from one story to another.
Honestly though this thread, and pretty much this entire forum, has turned into nothing more than a handful of men showing off who has the biggest fucking dick. And I'm tired of it. Like 95% of the authors on this site I think I will stick to writing for my readers and stop wasting time on petty squabbles and bullshit. To those of you who have helped, supported and encouraged me I thank you. The rest of y'all can suck it.