What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?

Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s 4:57 p.m., and the Doctor is not picking up the phone


That’s the format of a joke I often told about calling up state regulators when I was in private practice. They go off duty at 5 p.m., so the phone stops being answered at a few minutes before because a conversation started at 4:57 p.m. might go beyond 5 p.m., and they don’t get paid for that.

It’s coming to a doctor near you because Obamacare regulations are pushing doctors to become employees rather than owners, as Scott Gottlieb writes in The Wall Street Journal, The Doctor Won’t See You Now. He’s Clocked Out:


Big government likes big providers. That’s why ObamaCare is gradually making the local doctor-owned medical practice a relic. In the not too distant future, most physicians will be hourly wage earners, likely employed by a hospital chain….

ObamaCare’s main vehicle for ending the autonomous, private delivery of medicine is the hospital-owned “accountable care organization.” The idea is to turn doctors into hospital employees and pay them flat rates that uncouple their income from how much care they deliver. (Ending the fee-for-service payment model is supposed to eliminate doctors’ financial incentives to perform extraneous procedures.)The Obama administration also imposes new costs on physicians who remain independent—for example, mandating that all medical offices install expensive information-technology systems.

The result? It is estimated that by next year, about 50% of U.S. doctors will be working for a hospital or hospital-owned health system. A recent survey by the Medical Group Management Association shows a nearly 75% increase in the number of active doctors employed by hospitals or hospital systems since 2000, reflecting a trend that sharply accelerated around the time that ObamaCare was enacted. The biggest shifts are in specialties such as cardiology and oncology.

Read the whole thing. It explains how this structure alters physician behaviors, and how the esoteric and complicated billing structure exacerbates the situation.

I had dinner this weekend with a physician in private practice, who bemoaned the changes taking place and how much time he has to spend on “all that crap” other than practicing medicine. He doesn’t know how much longer he can take it, a feeling he says is common among his peers. They’re planning their exit strategies.
 
It’s 4:57 p.m., and the Doctor is not picking up the phone


That’s the format of a joke I often told about calling up state regulators when I was in private practice. They go off duty at 5 p.m., so the phone stops being answered at a few minutes before because a conversation started at 4:57 p.m. might go beyond 5 p.m., and they don’t get paid for that.

It’s coming to a doctor near you because Obamacare regulations are pushing doctors to become employees rather than owners, as Scott Gottlieb writes in The Wall Street Journal, The Doctor Won’t See You Now. He’s Clocked Out:


Big government likes big providers. That’s why ObamaCare is gradually making the local doctor-owned medical practice a relic. In the not too distant future, most physicians will be hourly wage earners, likely employed by a hospital chain….

ObamaCare’s main vehicle for ending the autonomous, private delivery of medicine is the hospital-owned “accountable care organization.” The idea is to turn doctors into hospital employees and pay them flat rates that uncouple their income from how much care they deliver. (Ending the fee-for-service payment model is supposed to eliminate doctors’ financial incentives to perform extraneous procedures.)The Obama administration also imposes new costs on physicians who remain independent—for example, mandating that all medical offices install expensive information-technology systems.

The result? It is estimated that by next year, about 50% of U.S. doctors will be working for a hospital or hospital-owned health system. A recent survey by the Medical Group Management Association shows a nearly 75% increase in the number of active doctors employed by hospitals or hospital systems since 2000, reflecting a trend that sharply accelerated around the time that ObamaCare was enacted. The biggest shifts are in specialties such as cardiology and oncology.

Read the whole thing. It explains how this structure alters physician behaviors, and how the esoteric and complicated billing structure exacerbates the situation.

I had dinner this weekend with a physician in private practice, who bemoaned the changes taking place and how much time he has to spend on “all that crap” other than practicing medicine. He doesn’t know how much longer he can take it, a feeling he says is common among his peers. They’re planning their exit strategies.


The shift from private practice to network-owned practice has been going on for decades. And all the billing structure is due to increased complexity from the private insurance industry that's been a decades-long trend as well. But I guess that's Obama's fault too.

Now you're saying that electronic medical records legislation which has always received broad bipartisan support, is a bad thing. Classic right wing hypocrisy.
 
Last edited:
systems since 2000, reflecting a trend that sharply accelerated around the time that ObamaCare was enacted. The biggest shifts are in specialties such as cardiology and oncology

2 can play the same game

here is the BOTTOM line


you and your fellow NIGGERZ will fuckus on the 7 peeps that MAY be helped and ignore the 350 million that will be hurt

we get it:rolleyes:

(Oh, I know you wont answer, but where do YOU see CONSERVATIVE? In the other thread......I know you know where I meant, but I will play your game:rolleyes:)
 
Sequester Update: Feds Fund $880K Study To Find Benefits Of Snail Sex, Still No White House Tours…




It costs the government roughly $7 per White House visitor, so if we axed the snail porn study more than 125K people could tour what is supposedly the “People’s House.”


(CNSNews.com) – The National Science Foundation awarded a grant for $876,752 to the University of Iowa to study whether there is any benefit to sex among New Zealand mud snails and whether that explains why any organism has sex.

The study, first funded in 2011 and continuing until 2015, will study the New Zealand snails to see if it is better that they reproduce sexually or asexually – the snail can do both – hoping to gain insight on why so many organisms practice sexual reproduction.

“Sexual reproduction is more costly than asexual reproduction, yet nearly all organisms reproduce sexually at least some of the time. Why is sexual reproduction so common despite its costs,” the study’s abstract asks.
 
Here's the survey as published by the New England Journal of Medicine. The graphs are flash and won't post on their own. They show a trend that's been going on since the survey began in 2002.

http://www.nejm.org/action/showImage?doi=10.1056/NEJMp1101959&iid=f02
http://www.nejm.org/action/showImage?doi=10.1056/NEJMp1101959&iid=f01

By the way, you edited out that your opinion piece is from the conservative propaganda mill, the American Enterprise Institute. What a shitty thing to do.

If you want actual facts you should read the NEJM article instead of the Tea Party filtered version of it. Their conclusion is that Hospital-based practices are more cost-efficient, more economically sustainable, promote greater doctor productivity, provide better coordination of care, provide patients with a wider array of resources, and promote better patient outcomes.

You and the Tea Party say those are bad things!
 
NEJM is NOT credible



(now get the fuck back to the other thread and answer a SIMPLE question!)
 
.

If you want actual facts you should read the NEJM article instead of the Tea Party filtered version of it. Their conclusion is that Hospital-based practices are more cost-efficient, more economically sustainable, promote greater doctor productivity, provide better coordination of care, provide patients with a wider array of resources, and promote better patient outcomes.

You and the Tea Party say those are bad things!

gee whiz

ALL those good things

they forgot to say

APPLE PIE BASEBALL and the AMERICAN FLAG:rolleyes:
 
NEJM is NOT credible



(now get the fuck back to the other thread and answer a SIMPLE question!)

The most respected medical journal in the world is not credible when it comes to medical system issues. Only the Tea Party is credible when it comes to medical issues.
 
correct

you know why?

CAUSE ONLY ONE SIDE HAS BEEN RIGHT FROM DAY 1

The OTHER SIDE HAS BEEN WORNG ABOUT EVERYTHING AND LIED ABOUT EVERYTHING
 
correct

you know why?

CAUSE ONLY ONE SIDE HAS BEEN RIGHT FROM DAY 1

The OTHER SIDE HAS BEEN WORNG ABOUT EVERYTHING AND LIED ABOUT EVERYTHING

I just linked your survey you wanted me to look at and it backs my point, not yours. Thanks.
 
your point may or may not be right, your POINT has been shown to 100% wrong


Go look at the charts again. My point is correct and your Tea Party article is outright lying. Are you unable to read graphs or something?

According to that survey the trend towards Hospital-based practices has been linear with a bit of an acceleration around 2004. Which party was in power in 2004?
 
crowing?

NIGGER CURRY?


Weekly U.S. jobless claims rise 16,000



WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- The number of people applying for new unemployment-insurance benefits rose 16,000 to 357,000 in the week ended March 23, reaching the highest level since mid-February, the U.S. Labor Department reported Thursday. Economists had expected initial jobless claims for regular state unemployment-insurance benefits to rise to 339,000 from an original estimate of 336,000 in the prior week, according to a MarketWatch survey. Rising claims signal more layoffs, and initial claims have increased for two consecutive weeks. However, analysts warn over reading too much into near-term claims levels because of holiday-related distortion. On Thursday, the government revised the prior week's level to 341,000. The average of new claims over the past month, which irons out weekly volatility, rose 2,250 to 343,000. However, the number of people already receiving benefits dropped 27,000 to 3.05 million in the week ended March 16, hitting the lowest level since June 2008. The four-week average of these continuing claims fell 13,000 to 3.07 million, also reaching the lowest level since June 2008. Also Thursday, the government said its analysts have made annual revisions to seasonal-adjustment factors, impacting claims levels back to 2008.
 
crowing?

NIGGER CURRY?


Weekly U.S. jobless claims rise 16,000



WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- The number of people applying for new unemployment-insurance benefits rose 16,000 to 357,000 in the week ended March 23, reaching the highest level since mid-February, the U.S. Labor Department reported Thursday. Economists had expected initial jobless claims for regular state unemployment-insurance benefits to rise to 339,000 from an original estimate of 336,000 in the prior week, according to a MarketWatch survey. Rising claims signal more layoffs, and initial claims have increased for two consecutive weeks. However, analysts warn over reading too much into near-term claims levels because of holiday-related distortion. On Thursday, the government revised the prior week's level to 341,000. The average of new claims over the past month, which irons out weekly volatility, rose 2,250 to 343,000. However, the number of people already receiving benefits dropped 27,000 to 3.05 million in the week ended March 16, hitting the lowest level since June 2008. The four-week average of these continuing claims fell 13,000 to 3.07 million, also reaching the lowest level since June 2008. Also Thursday, the government said its analysts have made annual revisions to seasonal-adjustment factors, impacting claims levels back to 2008.


Didn't read your own link, dumbass?
 
your BULLSHOT works with the LOW INFO NIGGERS JACKASS

there are less

cause their BENEFITS RAN OUT:rolleyes:

You just posted that the number of folks with continuing claims is at the lowest point since 2008, a figure which continues to decline. And that's a bad thing?

First you post graphs that kick your own ass now you post Dept of Labor data that kicks your own ass. You're having a Vetteman caliber day.
 
Obamacare fallout



Practically nothing about Obamacare is turning out to be what President Obama said it would be. The Medicaid expansion is proving unattractive for a number of governors. Some of these (and others who are buying into the Medicaid expansion) won’t set up the exchanges. The medical device tax is now recognized as anti-technology and anti-jobs. The new taxes and mammoth regulations may be responsible for the lag in full-time job growth and the uptick in part-time work. Its contraception mandate (even after revision) is facing multiple legal challenges from religious institutions and individual employers claiming that it infringes on their religious liberty.


President Obama and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius- Susan Walsh/A.P.

It isn’t bending the cost-curve downward. Reuters reports:


A new study released on Tuesday by the nonpartisan Society of Actuaries estimates that individual premiums will rise 32 percent on average nationwide within three years, partly as a result of higher risk pools. Changes would vary by state, from an 80 percent hike in Wisconsin to a 14 percent reduction in New York. . . .

But the insurance industry, which is set to gain millions of new customers under the law, is warning of soaring premium costs next year because of new regulations that include the need to offer a broader scale of health benefits than some insurers do now.

That has raised concerns about people with individual policies not subject to subsidies and the potential for cost spillovers into the market for employer-sponsored plans, which according to U.S. Census data, cover about half of U.S. workers.





Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius insists this is not big deal. But Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) is already trying to push a change in the central premise of Obamacare — that all plans must include the exorbitantly expensive bells and whistles required by the feds (“an ‘employee choice’ policy that would allow some employers to offer a wider range of coverage choices to their workers at reduced rates for 2014″).

And families are getting the short end of the stick:


Millions of Americans will be priced out of health insurance under President Barack Obama’s healthcare overhaul because of a glitch in the law that adversely affects people with modest incomes who cannot afford family coverage offered by their employers, a leading healthcare advocacy group said on Tuesday.

Tax credits are a key component of the law and the White House has said the credits, averaging about $4,000 apiece, will help about 18 million individuals and families pay for health insurance once the Affordable Care Act takes full effect, beginning in January 2014.

The tax credits are geared toward low and middle-income Americans who do not have access to affordable health insurance coverage through an employer. The law specifies that employer-sponsored insurance is affordable so long as a worker’s share of the premium does not exceed 9.5 percent of the worker’s household income. In its rule making, or final interpretation of the law, the IRS said affordability should be based strictly on individual coverage costs, however.

In other words, many families will be forced to pay a fine because they can’t get affordable insurance for everyone in their household. The promises of “universal coverage” and “getting to keep the insurance you have” are proving to be illusory.

Democrats and the mainstream media (I repeat myself) were so anxious to dub Obamacare as an “historic bill” and defend it from all challenges that they have, until now, avoided grappling with the monstrous legislation that was poorly conceived. The Democrats who ushered it in should shoulder the blame, and Republicans should highlight these flaws that more than justify halting implementation of a truly misguided statute and the tens of thousands of accompanying regulations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top