What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh My: AFL-CIO In Nevada Passes Resolution Blasting Obamacare For “Destroying” Union Health Care…




Long gone are the days when AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka was bragging about Obamacare being “shoved down the Republicans’ throats.”


WASHINGTON — Signaling a growing rift between some unions and the White House over the Affordable Care Act, the Nevada State AFL-CIO passed a stinging resolution Wednesday that criticized the administration for its handling of their concerns with the health care reform law. The resolution claims the law could end up “destroying” the unions’ multi-employer health plans if the administration doesn’t come up with a regulatory fix.

“[O]ur union members and their families originally offered strong political and moral support for the promise of the Affordable Care Act because it would expand health care coverage for more Americans,” the resolution read. But when it came to dealing with the unions’ concerns, “the Administration has postured on proposals to address the problem, but no proposal to date will actually solve the problem. Our health plans only get worse.”

Several unions — UNITE HERE, the United Food and Commercial Workers and the Teamsters — have already voiced their worries that the law will undermine their multi-employer health care plans, known as Taft-Hartley plans. But Wednesday’s resolution formalizes a major state labor federation’s grievances just ahead of the AFL-CIO’s national convention next month — and just as the White House prepares for the law’s rollout amid attacks from the right.

The critique also creates some political awkwardness not only for the Obama administration but for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). One of the unions taking the lead on the issue, the 60,000-member Culinary Workers Union Local 226, a UNITE HERE affiliate, is the largest union in Nevada and a major political force in the state.
 
hopenchangegoodys.jpg
HOW’S THAT HOPEY-CHANGEY STUFF WORKIN’ OUT FOR YA? (CONT’D): Recession’s pain reaching deep into the economic recovery. “The buying power of Americans continues to be weaker than it was when the recession ended four years ago, underscoring the lasting damage wrought by the downturn, according to a report released Wednesday. Inflation-adjusted median household income has declined 4.4 percent, to $52,098, since June 2009, the official end of the recession, said the report by Sentier Research, an Annapolis data-analysis firm headed by two former Census Bureau officials.” Maybe we haven’t really “recovered” at all.



Its OK, almost LABOR DAY, Obama, Toned Arms and the 2 PROZZIES will be on vacation soon
 
Oh My: AFL-CIO In Nevada Passes Resolution Blasting Obamacare For “Destroying” Union Health Care…




Long gone are the days when AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka was bragging about Obamacare being “shoved down the Republicans’ throats.”


WASHINGTON — Signaling a growing rift between some unions and the White House over the Affordable Care Act, the Nevada State AFL-CIO passed a stinging resolution Wednesday that criticized the administration for its handling of their concerns with the health care reform law. The resolution claims the law could end up “destroying” the unions’ multi-employer health plans if the administration doesn’t come up with a regulatory fix.

“[O]ur union members and their families originally offered strong political and moral support for the promise of the Affordable Care Act because it would expand health care coverage for more Americans,” the resolution read. But when it came to dealing with the unions’ concerns, “the Administration has postured on proposals to address the problem, but no proposal to date will actually solve the problem. Our health plans only get worse.”

Several unions — UNITE HERE, the United Food and Commercial Workers and the Teamsters — have already voiced their worries that the law will undermine their multi-employer health care plans, known as Taft-Hartley plans. But Wednesday’s resolution formalizes a major state labor federation’s grievances just ahead of the AFL-CIO’s national convention next month — and just as the White House prepares for the law’s rollout amid attacks from the right.

The critique also creates some political awkwardness not only for the Obama administration but for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). One of the unions taking the lead on the issue, the 60,000-member Culinary Workers Union Local 226, a UNITE HERE affiliate, is the largest union in Nevada and a major political force in the state.

Fuck the unions, they are going to get just what they paid for. :cool:
 
we are all criminals


EXCLUSIVE: Feds are building a detective squad to target consumers and companies that don't follow Obamacare's rules
Post-Obamacare law hiring at the Department of Health and Human Services included 86 'criminal investigators,' but just two 'consumer safety' officers
On the day President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law in 2010, HHS received authority to make 1,814 new hires

The authorization included positions for 50 criminal investigators. The agency increased that number to 86

The agency was also authorized to hire 261 'consumer safety officers.' Only two such employees were hired

By David Martosko In Washington



More than 1,600 new employees hired by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Resources in the aftermath of Obamacare's passage include just two described as 'consumer safety' officers, but 86 tasked with 'criminal investigating' – indicating that the agency is building an army of detectives to sleuth out violations of a law that many in Congress who supported it still find confusing.


On the day President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law in 2010, HHS received authority from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to make as many as 1,814 new hires under an emergency 'Direct Hiring Authority' order.


The Obama administration ordered that employment expansion despite a government-wide hiring freeze.





A total of 1,684 of those positions were filled. An analysis by MailOnline shows that at 2010 federal government salary rates, the new employees' salaries alone cost the U.S. at least $138.8 million every year.

Had the agency filled all its available jobs, that cost would have been a minimum of $159 million.


The hiring began in May 2010 and continued through June 2013, making the later hires eligible for higher salaries as a result of annual cost-of-living increases.


The difference between what HHS spent on new Obamacare-related employees and what it was authorized to spend is explained by its failure to hire most of the 261 'consumer safety officers' it was authorized to bring aboard. Only two such employees were hired.


But while OPM authorized HHS Deputy Assistant Secretary for Human Resources Denise Carter -- later renamed Denise Wells -- to hire 50 criminal investigators, the agency increased that number to 86 on its own.

After MailOnline lodged a Freedom Of Information Request with HHS, the agency sent a spreadsheet containing records of the positions it filled, along with the salary level for each one on the government's 'GS' hiring scale.




On the day President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law in 2010, HHS received authority to make 1,814 new hires. Obama is pictured here on August 15


The lowest salary on the list was for a single contracting officer at Grade 7, Step 1, an annual rate of about $42,350, including a so-called 'differential' payments. Those increases are given to all federal employees in order to adjust for regional cost-of-living differences.


The highest salary in 2010 dollars, including that differential payment, was about $161,450, earned by a total of 29 new employee. They include health insurance administrators, contracting officers and information technology managers.


The fleet of 86 new criminal investigators are earning a range of compensation between $51,800 and $89,350, according to the 2010 salary tables and differential payment guidelines.


Judicial Watch, a nonprofit that has told MailOnline it files 'hundreds' of FOIA requests, first published evidence in July of the HHS hiring binge.


'Sounds like we now have the Obamacare police,' said the group's president, Tom Fitton, after MailOnline showed him the new data.


'Given the confusion and problems of the law's implementation, we would need a small army to police all the waste, fraud, and abuse that is already evident.'


Heritage Action for America, a conservative lobby group that opposes implementation of the Affordable Care Act, told MailOnline that it sees the hiring of criminal investigators inside HHS as a sign that its position is more and more defensible.


'The Obama administration continues to assert near unilateral power when it comes to Obamacare,' said Dan Holler, the group's communications director.


'This blatant disregard for the rule of law raises serious questions as to how these new criminal investigators will behave, what guidelines they will follow and who will provide much-needed oversight.'


Heritage Action is circulating a letter this week, penned by freshman GOP Rep. Mark Meadows, calling on 100 House Republicans to 'take the steps necessary to defund Obamacare in its entirety, including on a year-end funding bill like a continuing resolution.'


The Department of Health and Human Services didn't immediately respond to a request for comment, but it responded to MailOnline's FOIA request within the number of days the statute permits.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...nies-dont-follow-Obamacare.html#ixzz2ciKSaw5J
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
The consolidation of power at the federal level continues unabated. The federal intrusion into the affairs of the civil society is the result of a massive breach of constitutional safeguards. The answer isn't in a new President, the Congress, or the Courts, the answer is in Article V of the Constitution and the state's amendment authority under it. We have lost the war against limited government at the federal level, it is totally corrupt and drunk with power. Our only hope is to lawfully attack it at it's foundation...in the states.

Nobody who likes capitalism can bitch about this. That is literally the game plan.

Yet, they would vote for him again:

Under Obama, black unemployment back to twice the white rate
BY PAUL BEDARD | AUGUST 22, 2013 AT 3:05 PM

http://washingtonexaminer.com/under...-back-to-twice-the-white-rate/article/2534597

Yep. Show us the guy who plans to hire more government workers and reinstall affirmative action. If you don't have one then just shut up.
 
INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY: Obama’s Economy — We’ve Fallen And Can’t Get Up.
 
Stupid, unfeeling for-profit corporations! Oh, wait:



UVA officials announced a similar policy yesterday, also referencing the costs Obamacare will add to the university’s health care budget.

This may not seem like a big deal—either way, the spouses will be insured—but it points to some potential problems. For now, UPS and other companies are continuing to cover unemployed spouses, but given their anxiety about steep costs in the era of Obamacare, they could concievably soon decide to exclude them.

This could put more pressure on the exchanges, ramping up the number of older people receiving subsidized plans in the individual market. But what the exchanges need to work is more “young invincibles”, not more middle-aged spouses kicked off employee plans. And here the incentives seem to be working the opposite way.

It’s as if the whole thing were designed to fail.
 
Stupid, unfeeling for-profit corporations! Oh, wait:



UVA officials announced a similar policy yesterday, also referencing the costs Obamacare will add to the university’s health care budget.

This may not seem like a big deal—either way, the spouses will be insured—but it points to some potential problems. For now, UPS and other companies are continuing to cover unemployed spouses, but given their anxiety about steep costs in the era of Obamacare, they could concievably soon decide to exclude them.

This could put more pressure on the exchanges, ramping up the number of older people receiving subsidized plans in the individual market. But what the exchanges need to work is more “young invincibles”, not more middle-aged spouses kicked off employee plans. And here the incentives seem to be working the opposite way.

It’s as if the whole thing were designed to fail.

Best thing that could happen would be to implement it. Then people will see how fucked up it is. :D
 
Who the fuck cares!

Cruz wore Paisley PJ's 30 yrs ago!

And the RODEO CLOWN!:rolleyes:

Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession







President Obama likes to talk about income inequality, but what matters far more is the actual income of the typical American. And how has the typical American household income fared on Obama's watch? Well, the economic "recovery" has now spanned an Olympiad, and during that time the typical American household income has not only dropped—it has dropped more than twice as much as it did during the recession.




New estimates derived from the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey by Sentier Research indicate that the real (inflation-adjusted) median annual household income in America has fallen by 4.4 percent during the "recovery," after having fallen by 1.8 during the recession. During the recession, the median American household income fell by $1,002 (from $55,480 to $54,478). During the recovery—that is, from the officially defined end of the recession (in June 2009) to the most recent month for which figures are available (June 2013)—the median American household income has fallen by $2,380 (from $54,478 to $52,098). So the typical American household is making almost $2,400 less per year (in constant 2013 dollars) than it was four years ago, when the Obama "recovery" began.










Importantly, these income tallies include government payouts such as unemployment compensation and cash welfare. So Obama's method of funneling ever-more money and power to Washington, and then selectively divvying some of it back out, clearly isn't working for the typical American family. Nor would his proposed immigration bill help the income prospects of the median American. And perhaps it's just a coincidence, but the span of time over which the typical American household's income has dropped by about $2,400 a year (during an ostensible "recovery") corresponds almost exactly with the span of time that we've been living with the looming specter of Obamacare—which began to be debated in earnest around June 2009.
 
COBURN: OBAMA PERILOUSLY CLOSE TO IMPEACHMENT STANDARD - Tulsa World reports: At Muskogee town hall, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., called President Obama a friend but cautioned that he was “perilously close” to meeting the Constitutional standard for impeachment.

SOARING OBAMACARE COSTS - Delta faces ObamaCare cost crush - Forbes reports: “A recently-leaked letter from Delta Air Lines to the Obama administration states that the ‘cost of providing health care to our employees will increase by nearly $100,000,000 next year,” much of it due to ObamaCare…The costs imposed on Delta and our employees are very real and they are escalating. [ObamaCare’s costs], when combined with normal medical inflation and the end of the [Early Retiree Reinsurance] program mean that the cost of providing health care to our employees will increase by nearly $100 million next year.”’

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...yria-session-for-personal-trip/#ixzz2cp5xnVnJ
who cares?

Paisley PJ's from 30 yrs ago
 
COBURN: OBAMA PERILOUSLY CLOSE TO IMPEACHMENT STANDARD - Tulsa World reports: At Muskogee town hall, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., called President Obama a friend but cautioned that he was “perilously close” to meeting the Constitutional standard for impeachment.

President Obama has been caught PWB (President While Black) for almost 5 years now, about time Operation Impeach Teh Negar 2014 got their act together.

I'd ask you what charges you believe President Obama should be impeached on, but you and I both know there are no credible charges. You're just a pissy-pants sore loser, butthurt since November 2012.
 
President Obama has been caught PWB (President While Black) for almost 5 years now, about time Operation Impeach Teh Negar 2014 got their act together.

I'd ask you what charges you believe President Obama should be impeached on, but you and I both know there are no credible charges. You're just a pissy-pants sore loser, butthurt since November 2012.

being a NIGGER isn't enough?:cool:
 
President Obama has been caught PWB (President While Black) for almost 5 years now, about time Operation Impeach Teh Negar 2014 got their act together.

I'd ask you what charges you believe President Obama should be impeached on, but you and I both know there are no credible charges. You're just a pissy-pants sore loser, butthurt since July 2008.

Or there abouts anyway. I think you got your dates a bit off.
 
Not at all, he's violated his oath and the Constitutional requirement to see that the laws are faithfully executed. Don't even try and deny it. He's been given a gigantic pass on this by a complicit press.

Wrong again, you pusillanimous sack of shit.

He was re-elected with a majority of the American vote last November, but sniveling whiny ass cowards such as yourself refuse to accept the will of the people.

President Obama has violated NO oath of office, you can't come up with any evidence that he has.

Keep on whining, it's all you have.
 
Not at all, he's violated his oath and the Constitutional requirement to see that the laws are faithfully executed. Don't even try and deny it. He's been given a gigantic pass on this by a complicit press.

the "press" be scared of the Knee GROW:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top