Dyslexicea
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2012
- Posts
- 924
Once you accept that life isn't sacred at all, that it can extinguished by the force of emotions, by the force of law, the force of economics, or by sheer random chance, pro-choice and pro-life becomes pretty meaningless. We need to deal with the reality of our choices and the consequences to them. In biomedical engineering there is the issue of modifying and cloning life. Are we ready to handle these ethical issues? Not really, but we are often forced to when we play god with life.
This is not the place to get into a debate about god(please note small g), nor my right or any other women's to choose what happens to our bodies. Worry about your own choices and and your own body and leave mine alone.
Hold on for a second. The individual being cheated upon is being demeaned by his or her cheating partner. His or her situation is, by its nature, demeaning. Isn't it simply honest to use a term that has negative connotations ("cuckold" or "cucquean")? Or should people use the generic term "victim" out of some sense of political correctness? Example: "She was a victim of his infidelity." Should we eventually start referring to those cheated upon as "survivors of infidelity", rather than the 'demeaning' descriptor of "victim"?
I see you're into victim blaming. We women are often blamed when we're the victims of abuse and sexual violence. A few years ago two lesbians were shot on a beach in Florida, one died. The victim blamers started by claiming it was their own fault because they happened to have been holding hands and had exchanged a few innocent kisses. Perhaps you would blame them too.
I may live in a world where the victims are blamed but I refuse to meet evil with evil, so no I don't ever blame the victim, nor would I use a derogatory term to refer to one.