someoneyouknow
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2006
- Posts
- 28,274
"We believe it would be much better for GOP to win."
Thus read a transcript from the WikiLeaks Twitter account obtained by The Intercept. The above comment was by no other than Julian Assange himself.
His reasoning for supporting the con artist? Assange believed the con artist would have a more difficult time enacting military adventures than would Clinton who repeatedly said Ukraine should be armed so it could defend itself from Russia's invasion.
In addition to working for the con artist by releasing ONLY emails from Clinton and none of the messy information it was provided on the con artist including the sex tapes, Assange and the messages show a similar attitude of misogyny and sexism as portrayed by the con artist. In addition, and also similar to the con artist, Assange was worried about his public image even as he actively worked for one particular person.
Thus, all those weird statements about the election being rigged, about encouraging the Russians to commit espionage on a U.S. citizen, and so on, were a direct result of the cooperation and coordination between WikiLeaks and the con artist campaign. Even Roger Stone's foreknowledge of what would be released, and his coordination with Russian intelligence through the nome de guerre of Guccifer 2.0, was enabled by WikiLeaks.
https://theintercept.com/2018/02/14/julian-assange-wikileaks-election-clinton-trump/
Thus read a transcript from the WikiLeaks Twitter account obtained by The Intercept. The above comment was by no other than Julian Assange himself.
His reasoning for supporting the con artist? Assange believed the con artist would have a more difficult time enacting military adventures than would Clinton who repeatedly said Ukraine should be armed so it could defend itself from Russia's invasion.
In addition to working for the con artist by releasing ONLY emails from Clinton and none of the messy information it was provided on the con artist including the sex tapes, Assange and the messages show a similar attitude of misogyny and sexism as portrayed by the con artist. In addition, and also similar to the con artist, Assange was worried about his public image even as he actively worked for one particular person.
A former supporter of and volunteer for WikiLeaks, who goes by the name “Hazelpress” (The Intercept does not know the person’s real name), set up the direct message group in mid-2015 and later decided to leak its contents to the media after news broke that WikiLeaks had secretly corresponded with Donald Trump Jr. during the election, urging candidate Trump to reject the results as rigged if he lost and requesting that the president-elect use his connections to get Assange an Australian ambassadorship. “At this point, considering the power exercised by WikiLeaks, [disclosing] literally anything Assange says is in the public interest,” Hazelpress told The Intercept, including Assange’s political position during the 2016 election, since “WikiLeaks purports to be a neutral transparency organization.”
Thus, all those weird statements about the election being rigged, about encouraging the Russians to commit espionage on a U.S. citizen, and so on, were a direct result of the cooperation and coordination between WikiLeaks and the con artist campaign. Even Roger Stone's foreknowledge of what would be released, and his coordination with Russian intelligence through the nome de guerre of Guccifer 2.0, was enabled by WikiLeaks.
https://theintercept.com/2018/02/14/julian-assange-wikileaks-election-clinton-trump/
