Home alone, thinking of daughter
- Thread starter Timhammer
- Start date
E
EquinoxRising
Guest
How old are your two teen daughters?
Fierywhore
Up to being ridden
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2011
- Posts
- 24,224
Hello God ! I see you are assuming that everyone thinks of under 18. Last I heard teenagers last till 20.... You really need to think about being such a boring 'thought police thing'
The man is 51 give him credit for knowing the rules God !
E
EquinoxRising
Guest
Hello God ! I see you are assuming that everyone thinks of under 18. Last I heard teenagers last till 20.... You really need to think about being such a boring 'thought police thing'
The man is 51 give him credit for knowing the rules God !
He replied in PM and said they're minors. Fuck off, whore.
your obnoxious attempts at censorship
Equinox, I cannot understand something, and I ask you for your help.
I am talking about a blatant dichotomy I witness every time I see a post of yours. On the one hand, your avatar picture, a fairly raunchy engraving, which was appended to the Dutch edition of "The Story of Juliette" by the Marquis de' Sade (1789), with 3 women and 3 men in it, plus a statue of some kind of god in the background, sporting a hard-on. Engaged in rather pornographic undertakings, I would say. (you can see the picture more clearly on p.304 of "Erotica Universalis", a collection of (mostly ancient) erotica by Gilles Neret).
And then on the other hand, your constant attempts to censure most everybody here. For supposedly violating rules of Literotica.
Can you tell me, why you feel so compelled to act as Lit's "super censor", while on the other hand you seem to indulge in pornographic drawings from the late 18th century, which contain fairly risqué contents?
I am simply unable to reconcile what seems to me as two different sides of you, for which the term "dichotomy" is clearly an understatement.
Equinox, I cannot understand something, and I ask you for your help.
I am talking about a blatant dichotomy I witness every time I see a post of yours. On the one hand, your avatar picture, a fairly raunchy engraving, which was appended to the Dutch edition of "The Story of Juliette" by the Marquis de' Sade (1789), with 3 women and 3 men in it, plus a statue of some kind of god in the background, sporting a hard-on. Engaged in rather pornographic undertakings, I would say. (you can see the picture more clearly on p.304 of "Erotica Universalis", a collection of (mostly ancient) erotica by Gilles Neret).
And then on the other hand, your constant attempts to censure most everybody here. For supposedly violating rules of Literotica.
Can you tell me, why you feel so compelled to act as Lit's "super censor", while on the other hand you seem to indulge in pornographic drawings from the late 18th century, which contain fairly risqué contents?
I am simply unable to reconcile what seems to me as two different sides of you, for which the term "dichotomy" is clearly an understatement.
E
EquinoxRising
Guest
So, why you wish to use someone's personal ad to address this (instead of a PM) is beyond me... The image in my sig line (which is what you meant, not my avatar) does not violate the rules of Literotica. Neither does my av, for that matter. You mentioned me reminding others about the rules and then act as if I were breaking them myself?
So, a man who wants to fuck (or "thinks of" - and hints sexual innuendo - and whose profile says he's into "family fun") his 15 and 17 year old daughters is "okay" by you? I am in the wrong for feeling this is wrong? Since profiles have been down for a long time, who knows when this man wrote, or last updated, his profile. Were his children much younger "teens" when he did?
Now, I'm not particularly fond of anyone (myself included) hijacking someone's personal ad. The OP said he was thinking of his daughter and wants to chat or "role play". I asked him a question. Him. Not you. Not fierywhore.
If you have questions for me in the future, feel free to PM me.
Lastly, this "ad" and the profile are up for review with the site owners.
I can tell you why I posted my comment out in the open: because YOU, Equinox, carry our your obnoxious censorship activities out in the open.
And you don't seem to hesitate either, to hijack any thread you see fit, to get you censorship across. To everybody who does not care to hear it.
YOU are the hijacker here, not me.
And who gave you that job anyway, to check apparently every thread here for political correctness?
Can't you simply mind your own business? And let ad writers write what they like? Who are you to appear so self-righteous here?
That is why I added some info on your picture.
Similar threads
