eruditeaphrodite
Loves Spam
- Joined
- May 31, 2018
- Posts
- 395
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess that 'romantic' sex could probably be considered the 'norm' and therefore couln't be a fetish as society thinks you should only have sex with someone you love.
However, great as frantic, lustful sex is, whether it's with someone you love or just a casual fling, 'romantic' sex with lots of tender kissing and slow grinding and holding and being held and just having sex to be as close as you can get to that person without even necessarily feeling the need to cum is fantastic.
I love Romantic sex.
I would disagree with this. Firstly in that I think that (at least in the US), there are very few general societal norms anymore, with more people being shaped by the thoughts/practices of their particular subculture. I simply don’t see the idea that society at large has a “sex with someone you love” message any more.
Secondly, a fetish does not refer to the prevalence of a particular act or fixation, but rather the need for the individual who had the fetish to have said action, object, etc. in order to actually become aroused or perform. In this sense, even something highly mundane can become a fetish.
Yes it is.
I don't want always animal sex or rough sex.
Without roman sex is nothing.
There is a place for everything.
Romantic sex is probably the most fulfilling and satisfying by far. slow touching, caressing, kissing, building to sex that is more about mutual ecstasy and colossal orgasms with holding and cuddling in thew glow afterward
Then there is raw lustful animal sex. Hard and to the point with little foreplay and preparation. fucking each others brains out.
You need to have both and they don't necessarily have to be with different partners! Having both with your SO is the best of both worlds !