Israeli Terrorists at it Again!

4est_4est_Gump

Run Forrest! RUN!
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Posts
89,007
Bombing Hamas, the innocent representatives of the Religion of Peace.

:mad:

Damned dirty Jews...
 
This is going to anger President Obama.

:(

He might have to draw some red lines and do some international isolating...
 
President Obama won one for the Environment!

:)

Canada is sending its dirty oil to Asia...




[... maybe Asian Hawaii, they will still bear some watching.]
 
It's not like Hamas captured and murdered three teenagers!
 
It's not President Obama's fault that Israeli prime minister Netanyahu can't protect his own people.
 
They're an honorable, industrious people who are very sensitive to the needs of others.

Funny how two months ago the violence in the Religion of Peace was an insignificant subset of Islam, but now that Obama has lost Iraq and dead set on losing Afghanistan, now they are all brutal illiterates who just want to kill each other. You cannot stop them, you cannot reason with them, you cannot help them, so just let them kill each other and the Jews and our Ambassadors, hey, even our citizens on the street, are just acceptable collateral damage as long as our "children" in the military are not dying...

A_J's corollary #3, “The New Age Liberal maintains contradictory positions comfortably compartmentalized. (This is because the New Age Liberal is a creature that believes in consensus as a short-cut to an examination of the facts and a reasoned judgment about said facts. Corollary #2.)”
 
and Hamas.....question is, what will Hamas do in retaliation?

Run to the UN for aid, assistance and condemnation...

;) ;)

... then they will launch more rockets and kidnap more children; Religion of Peace.

:eek:

Of course, they've been launching rockets from Gaza for the last two weeks, but the Western Press is only concerned with Israel.
 
Israel's philosophy is 12 eyes for one eye.

The tactic of "disproportionate response" was a favorite of the Nazis too.
Everything old is new again.
measured_response.png
 
ThrobDownSouth is a big (and that's mot jut a fat joke) fan of bringing harm to other people's children...

:eek:

... he was ecstatic when he learned of the murder of the Jewish boys; he considers it a good start.
 
ThrobDownSouth is a big (and that's mot jut a fat joke) fan of bringing harm to other people's children...

:eek:

... he was ecstatic when he learned of the murder of the Jewish boys; he considers it a good start.

Actually he'd prefer they die in a fire, which is what he publicly wishes my kids would do.

What a sick fuck.
 
Actually he'd prefer they die in a fire, which is what he publicly wishes my kids would do.

What a sick fuck.

Of course he dreams that you sodomize them first.

Yes, he is one sick fuck, but the Democrats here love him...

;)

Tells us more about them than it does him.
 
Apparently someone other than Obama is in charge when the IRS goes rogue, the VA implodes, the Justice Department goes after Associated Press reporters, the consulate in Benghazi is overrun, the NSA taps the phones of allied leaders, Iraq is torn apart, the Middle East melts down, or we trade five terrorist kingpins for an American deserter. Obama’s impromptu adolescent moaning was bizarre and reminds us again why he would be wiser to stay close to his teleprompter.

Obama also seems oddly to forget that when he promised to use his pen and phone to run things by his lonesome, nearly everyone took him at his word. And so he tried just that. What Obama is now angry about is not partisanship per se, but that his own partisanship and subversion of settled law have been repudiated consistently by both the Supreme Court and the American public. Were Obama’s poll ratings at 60 percent, and were the Supreme Court upholding his pen-and-phone governance, and were the Democrats on the verge of winning back their long-lost supermajority in the Senate and taking back the House, then Obama would hardly be decrying partisanship, the media, the Tea Party, or Republicans in general. “Messing” with Obama means not being convinced that his record has helped America.

So there is an increasingly desperate strain to the Obama Left, the more so in that the scandals pile up and any idea of a legacy vanishes into Carteresque caricature. One unfortunate result of the end of the “hope and change” and “fundamental transformation” agenda is a sour-grapes nihilism — a sort of “the scandals are your problem, not mine” attitude. In each case, those worried about the mounting chaos are flippantly dismissed with the assumption that they themselves are at fault for worrying about it.

...

Barack Obama campaigned on the idea of Afghanistan as the good war and Iraq as the bad one. Indeed, as a presidential candidate in late 2007 he rashly called — in the middle of the successful surge — for the departure of all U.S. combat troops from Iraq by the end of March 2008. He later pronounced the surge a failure. He concluded that it would even make matters in Iraq worse. Then he hushed up as the surge, in fact, bequeathed to him a mostly quiet Iraq.

As president, Obama seemed content for most of 2009–2011 to keep trashing George W. Bush for the Iraq War, while simultaneously claiming the calm as his own doing (cf. Joe Biden’s assessment of Iraq as likely to prove the administration’s “greatest achievement” and Obama’s own characterization of the post-surge Iraq as “stable” and “self-reliant”).

With a little inspired diplomacy Obama could have easily left some residual U.S. troops to ensure that Iraq in fact remained for America what Obama himself called “an extraordinary achievement.” But then again, the 2012 reelection campaign loomed, and the sloganeering of “ending one war and winding down another” apparently made such peacekeeping electorally impossible.

Obama was reelected. Iraq descended into Somalia-like chaos. And the administration’s indifferent attitude for most of 2013, as it watched the growing ISIS threat from Syria spill into Iraq, was something like either “Stuff happens” or “Bush did it.”

What we have been watching unfold in the last six months is the veritable destruction of the Middle East, at least as it had existed for 70 years. National borders are disappearing. The idea of a nation state itself is vanishing. Arabs are institutionalizing their ancient creed that tribal affinities always trump national allegiances. The slur against utopian neo-cons was that they naïvely thought they could remove a tyranny in the Middle East and foster democracy at a reasonable cost; the writ against the dystopian neo-progressives will be that they alternately ignored, appeased, threatened, and bombed a nation to ensure chaos.

There is now no middle ground in the region. The conflict is largely descending into radical Sunni fundamentalism versus radical Shiite fundamentalism. At a time when the U.S. should be trying to ensure the safety of the few remaining Sunni-dominated states of the Middle East, and reassuring smaller and moderate pro-American nations or provinces (e.g., Jordan, Israel, and Kurdistan), the Obama administration is either decidedly indifferent or toying with the apparently neat idea of allying ourselves with Iran. That theocracy through its terrorist appendages is probably responsible for killing more Americans over the last 30 years than any other nation state.

The administration’s Middle East message could best be summed up along the following lines: “Barack Obama, with his singular sympathies for Islam, came into the world to save the Middle East from George W. Bush’s Texan rambunctiousness, but the Middle East did not accept salvation at his hands — so goodbye to them all, and they probably will get what they deserve” (a message, by the way, that the hyper-political Obama administration knows resonates with lots of Americans, left and right).
Victor Davis Hanson, NRO


I think the replies in the other threads are starting to bear this out.
 
libbies hate Israel because Israel doesn't bow and kowtow to terrorists the way the democrats in this country do. I would imagine for many of them in here, Israel is just full of Jews, so why should they give a shit.
 
Back
Top