bumpercars
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2017
- Posts
- 123
I'm trying to figure out exactly what the rules are for moderator approval in the non-con category.
There's a story in the new queue right now in which a man has abducted a woman, who he rapes and impregnates. He keeps her imprisoned and forces her to watch a video of her impregnation each day, until she's very pregnant and has Stockholm syndrome.
Now, this story obviously got through moderation, which is fine. Fantasies are for exploring ideas, including ideas that don't belong in reality.
But I wrote a story for the non-con section that also had an impregnation. Similarly, the victim objected very thoroughly, although she had an orgasm anyway. Similarly, she was not physically hurt. It got rejected with this note:
"We generally do not accept submissions of nonconsensual sex in which the "victim" gets absolutely no sort of thrill or enjoyment from the acts, or is seriously and /or permanently physically harmed/abused."
So, I guess what I'm wondering is, where are the moderators drawing the line? Do all of the victims in non-con stories need to be secretly happy about it now, even if that happiness is itself forced?
There's a story in the new queue right now in which a man has abducted a woman, who he rapes and impregnates. He keeps her imprisoned and forces her to watch a video of her impregnation each day, until she's very pregnant and has Stockholm syndrome.
Now, this story obviously got through moderation, which is fine. Fantasies are for exploring ideas, including ideas that don't belong in reality.
But I wrote a story for the non-con section that also had an impregnation. Similarly, the victim objected very thoroughly, although she had an orgasm anyway. Similarly, she was not physically hurt. It got rejected with this note:
"We generally do not accept submissions of nonconsensual sex in which the "victim" gets absolutely no sort of thrill or enjoyment from the acts, or is seriously and /or permanently physically harmed/abused."
So, I guess what I'm wondering is, where are the moderators drawing the line? Do all of the victims in non-con stories need to be secretly happy about it now, even if that happiness is itself forced?