Who is better at rigging elections?

Viagra has the market cornered when it comes to Rigging Erections.
Tablets to help with Dyslexia are harder to come by though.

Speaking of which - How the hell did Viagra manage to get to the nonprescription section in the over the counter isle?
 
Speaking of which - How the hell did Viagra manage to get to the nonprescription section in the over the counter isle?

Because its an exponential growth product with little market shrinkage?

Because the person that had ingested that Viagra was standing in the nonprescription section in the over the counter isle?

Errrr, yeah i give up: why?

:D
 
You saw this in a WalMart pharmacy?

Walgreen. I went in for some electrolyte solution. Enroute to the checkout counter, I looked down and noticed it on a bottom shelf close to the register. As if it were put there intentionally so people would see it. Little red box w/white print on it.
 
Because its an exponential growth product with little market shrinkage?

Because the person that had ingested that Viagra was standing in the nonprescription section in the over the counter isle?

Errrr, yeah i give up: why?

:D

Could be. There's always a money angle isn't there?
 
The prolonged angle of the dangle does indeed seem linked closely to the proportions of the ~Dick~wad in the wallet.
They've turned the tables upside-down. Now we get the WORST gov't money can buy! It's supposed to be just the opposite. Where's the quality control?
 
Is the notion of the free election a mass delusion?
Yup.
If by free you mean having a reasonable degree of certainty your vote actually counts for the person you choose.

Yes. For Democrats when they lose elections. It can't be them, their message, platform or desired programs because they offer the winning package every time. When they lose it was through election tampering and money from the various devils like the Koch Brothers and the NRA. When they win, then election rigging is no big deal because it's so rare and the money given to them by entities like Soros and the unions is rightful free speech.
The fact that not a single vote cast in the US using an electronic voting machine can be independently confirmed to have gone to the person intended is irrelevant to which party someone belongs to.

The vast majority are as ignorant about it as you've shown yourself to be.
 
Yup.
If by free you mean having a reasonable degree of certainty your vote actually counts for the person you choose.

The fact that not a single vote cast in the US using an electronic voting machine can be independently confirmed to have gone to the person intended is irrelevant to which party someone belongs to.

The vast majority are as ignorant about it as you've shown yourself to be.
I was in Guatemala during a presidential campaign there, before their next president was imprisoned for corruption. (DC: take note.) Brief slogans and party-candidate logos were painted everywhere, including roadside rocks. In the election, people went to polls and marked paper ballots, which were manually counted under watchful eyes.

Totally honest? Of course not. But much more traceable than US elections. I trust results there more than here. Without a paper trail, there's nothing.
 
I was in Guatemala during a presidential campaign there, before their next president was imprisoned for corruption. (DC: take note.) Brief slogans and party-candidate logos were painted everywhere, including roadside rocks. In the election, people went to polls and marked paper ballots, which were manually counted under watchful eyes.

Totally honest? Of course not. But much more traceable than US elections. I trust results there more than here. Without a paper trail, there's nothing.
That's part of the fallacy. Even a paper trail for electronic will only come in to play if the election is close.
Since the code running the voting machines is proprietary and can't be independently verified, an election could be ringed so that it's not close enough to cause a recount, no one would be the wiser.
Only if the paper trail is also tallied is there any confidence.
 
They've turned the tables upside-down. Now we get the WORST gov't money can buy! It's supposed to be just the opposite. Where's the quality control?

If politics and elections were business(ahem,ahem..:D;) )
It would all be about profits and juggling shareholder satisfaction(us),skimming every $ possible for select stakeholders(them).
Nevertheless, in the last few days it has become known that the real quality controllers are Cambridge and facefook.. :D
What a sad sad business the farcical puppet show we call ‘modern democracy’ appears to be.
FTW and fuck the shareholders. Profits and control is where its at.
 
Back
Top