RobDownSouth
Never Banhammered
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 72,109
If you're a lib and you didn't read it there first, it never happened.
Good ole Vetteman, always telling us libs how we REALLY think.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you're a lib and you didn't read it there first, it never happened.
So I gave him a source headquartered right in his city of residence.
Doesn't anybody read legitimate news sources anymore?
Where's the evidence that the parliament, or a committee, has discussed or is discussing such a bill in any serious fashion?If a law was being discussed in a committee of congress and they were taking testimony as to it's passage, and a constituent sent a letter to the committee expressing fears about the passage of the bill, would you maintain that her fears weren't warranted because the bill wasn't actually law, or that the bill wasn't on track to becoming law? God damn!
Where's the evidence that the parliament, or a committee, has discussed or is discussing such a bill in any serious fashion?
All I've seen is:
- two religious nut jobs claim that it's ok for couples to have sex after one of them has died
- one person who supposedly wrote a letter worried about it (I haven't seen the text of the letter published anywhere)
- one nut job who started a thread without doing any sort of fact checking or critical thinking.
Please link to a single quote in this thread defending the supposed law.It's a riot to see all the loonies come out to defend muslim atrocities
Necrophilia is nothing new in deviant muslim sexual practices, and in fact goes all the way back to their leader:
SEXUAL PERVERSIONS OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD
NECROPHILIA WITH HIS DEAD AUNT
http://schnellmann.org/Necrophilia_With_His_Dead_Aunt.pdf
I see, so you consider as fact a report about a book written based on a hadith written by people after Mohammad's death.
That's almost as crazy as some of the christian bullshit out there....
about_average said:I see, so you consider as fact a report about a book written based on a hadith written by people after Mohammad's death.
The sooner we nuke Iran and all the other rag heads the better.
You'd challenge sermons/scriptures about the the Bible, too?
He is supposedly their God. His life is their law.
Why do you find any interpretation of it, by his followers to be odd?
I hope he says take over Brazil.
Yes.You'd challenge sermons/scriptures about the the Bible, too?
He is supposedly their God. His life is their law.
Why do you find any interpretation of it, by his followers to be odd?
I haven't seen anything confirming it's 100% real yet. Or to be accurate, I haven't seen anything at all that confirms it's real.Looks as if whoever started it did a awesome job. From MSN, to ABC, to Yahoo, everyone fell for it.....but I do not see anything confirmed that it is 100% fake yet.
But what is really weird is I see no out rage over the other part of the law...you know, marring a 14yr old.
That's your standard for believing shit you read and hear?Looks as if whoever started it did a awesome job. From MSN, to ABC, to Yahoo, everyone fell for it.....but I do not see anything confirmed that it is 100% fake yet.
But what is really weird is I see no out rage over the other part of the law...you know, marring a 14yr old.
Bunch of Pedophiles!!!