Oh_That_Guy
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2015
- Posts
- 1,267
What unites macro and microeconomics herr Professor?
Did I saw I knew anything about it? I did not. You can pretend all day long if you want but I got over that bullshit years ago.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What unites macro and microeconomics herr Professor?
It's bizarre and so opposite from (my, for ex.) real life, what's happening on Lit.
In my real world, for ex. I encounter many 'conservatives' who are intolerant of others' opinion, and either shut you up with vengeance or carry a grudge, whenever you express some different opinions… I learned to keep my mouth shut and open up only with the (by the same token, many) 'libs.' from work.
Here, on Lit, a couple or more 'libs.' act like angry real-life 'conservatives' who are intolerant of anythin. that spells "different", opinion-wise at least.
Did I saw I knew anything about it? I did not. You can pretend all day long if you want but I got over that bullshit years ago.
You would think that after at least 10 years of using "ad hominem" over and over the fucker would learn to finally use it in the right context.
PoppingSean found his coup de grace phrase.
How do you know the mothers were on welfare?
You would think that after at least 10 years of using "ad hominem" over and over the fucker would learn to finally use it in the right context.
How do I know that Sean is on welfare?
I know. And now you act with the angry Sophism of Socialism.
We get that.
How do you know the mothers were on welfare?
There is no such thing as common-sense regulation. It is as big a mythical red herring as Capitalism.
What you like is called government control, a facet of Socialism. The beautiful thing about a phrase such as "commons sense" is that it has no terminal definition and thus the Socialist is free to control every aspect of life in the name of common sense, because common sense is in the eye of the beholder.
This is how common sense leads to complete Socialism:
So your question was just rhetorical?
Shall I really discuss the terms "capitalism" and "socialism" with somebody who thinks because of ACA America became a socialist country?
Nah.
How do I know that Sean is on welfare? Because we all know!
No, I think that you are a Socialist because you are a Socialist.
It has become such a bad word that you would never utter it.
It is s very simple litmus test: Do you believe that it is the role of government to regulate business to protect us from business?
Do you believe that it is the role of government to regulate business to protect us from business?
Sorta curious now why you would think that of me. Can you show me something I've said that would imply I'm a socialist?
And that's a stupid litmus test because it's not a yes or no answer. The role of government from any viewpoint is much more complicated than that unless the person is an utter fool and...
Now it makes sense.
Bastiat was a stranger to the word.
No, I think that you are a Socialist because you are a Socialist.
It is s very simple litmus test: Do you believe that it is the role of government to regulate business?
There is black and white, and if you refuse to believe that, then you will accept grey and let me tell you gray tends to black for when you say ∃ of anything is a good function of government then ∃ is everything ¬∀ and while you may be able to advocate for ∃ you won't be allowed to define it and in this manner its limit will be ∀ for ∑f(∪∃)i [i=from you to the total population] will never tend to ∅ by definition so it is easy to see that it is, indeed, an ∀ or ∅ when it comes to government. (Now, the ∑f(∩∃)i [i=from you to the total population] will tend to ∅ but that is politically unattainable for the obvious reason that the more ∃ is defined, the smaller the ∩∃ becomes.)
So? I asked what he has to say this morning, not what he thought of the subject, learn to read.
I'm shocked you're not quoting him to sound smart anymore.
You think EVERYONE is a socialist.
FYP.....apparently you don't know what socialism is.....shocking
It is a yes-no answer.
And if you think anything other, then you are a Socialist. Are you not concerned about the excesses of Capitalism and "income inequality?" I know that you are on guard, and all but done with me, but how about a little honesty...
If you believe that the government should have "some" duty to regulate, then you cannot define some and you can never say when you have enough,
so Socialism grows and grows and the economy gets worse and worse
and when it does, the cry goes out into the night, "It's the failings of Capitalism and we need some common-sense regulation of Capitalism and some common-sense taxation of the rich.