AwkwardMD
Belzebutts
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2014
- Posts
- 1,679
1) https://youtu.be/u8qgehH3kEQ
To anyone who knows better, the bluetooth hacking looks just as silly as this. This is to be avoided, on Literotica or anywhere.
2)https://www.lawyers.com/legal-info/...murder-during-the-commission-of-a-felony.html
And
https://legaldictionary.net/invasion-of-privacy/
Based on these, second degree murder is the more likely crime that the POV would be charged with. I overreached with first degree, but not by much.
***
Some people would argue that fiction has a responsibility for its content. If, for example, a reader reads a story in which a white man beats up a black man and then goes out and does exactly that, how much responsibility does that author bear?
Similarly, for example, many would argue that BDSM fiction has a responsibility to show BDSM correctly and accurately. There are real dangers involved in BDSM and, when done wrong, presents legitimate health threats to those involved.
Those are both fair points of view. I disagree with them, but they're fair. What I do believe, however, is that questionable and serious content should be handled appropriately. In other words, a story that presents stab wounds as a good thing is irresponsible. Likewise, Mary Sue-ing your way through murder is not just distasteful but badly conceived and dangerous. I've written some pretty dark material, but the perpetrators are not glorified let alone vindicated.
To me, this is a less serious version of shouting 'fire' in a theater. It doesn't matter that you're trying to squeeze something into 750 words or that it's "just on Lit". Irresponsible is irresponsible. You not liking that doesn't make it not true.
***
Rurger5 is another writer who didn't like what I had to say about his story. Him taking shots at me is nothing new.
It's petty and predictable.
NotWise, Hypoxia, CoffeeWithMonkeys, and PrevertOne, however, have no axe to grind with me. When they disagree, they do so because they simply disagree. This should be obvious, but their opinions are exactly as important as mine, which is to say we're each just one person and not necessarily experts whose opinions carry extra weight.
In the end, listen to the advice that makes the most sense to you, not the advice you like because it makes you feel good.
To anyone who knows better, the bluetooth hacking looks just as silly as this. This is to be avoided, on Literotica or anywhere.
2)https://www.lawyers.com/legal-info/...murder-during-the-commission-of-a-felony.html
And
https://legaldictionary.net/invasion-of-privacy/
Based on these, second degree murder is the more likely crime that the POV would be charged with. I overreached with first degree, but not by much.
***
Some people would argue that fiction has a responsibility for its content. If, for example, a reader reads a story in which a white man beats up a black man and then goes out and does exactly that, how much responsibility does that author bear?
Similarly, for example, many would argue that BDSM fiction has a responsibility to show BDSM correctly and accurately. There are real dangers involved in BDSM and, when done wrong, presents legitimate health threats to those involved.
Those are both fair points of view. I disagree with them, but they're fair. What I do believe, however, is that questionable and serious content should be handled appropriately. In other words, a story that presents stab wounds as a good thing is irresponsible. Likewise, Mary Sue-ing your way through murder is not just distasteful but badly conceived and dangerous. I've written some pretty dark material, but the perpetrators are not glorified let alone vindicated.
To me, this is a less serious version of shouting 'fire' in a theater. It doesn't matter that you're trying to squeeze something into 750 words or that it's "just on Lit". Irresponsible is irresponsible. You not liking that doesn't make it not true.
***
Rurger5 is another writer who didn't like what I had to say about his story. Him taking shots at me is nothing new.
It's petty and predictable.
NotWise, Hypoxia, CoffeeWithMonkeys, and PrevertOne, however, have no axe to grind with me. When they disagree, they do so because they simply disagree. This should be obvious, but their opinions are exactly as important as mine, which is to say we're each just one person and not necessarily experts whose opinions carry extra weight.
In the end, listen to the advice that makes the most sense to you, not the advice you like because it makes you feel good.
Last edited:
