Tryharder62
Keep Believing
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Posts
- 12,746
Oh, I love that song
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My bad. I blame late night, mixing up my P's.I see what you're saying.
You switched from Peter to Paul,
You switched from Peter to Paul,
A picture from that era showed a leggy blonde babe sitting on the side-by-side shoulders of two hulking black guys, BBCs for sure. The caption: PETER, PAUL, AND YOUR SISTER.What happened to Mary?
Oh yeah, she got knocked up by .... ummm ... Puff, The Magic Dragon .... yeah, that's it.
What happened to Mary?
Oh yeah, she got knocked up by .... ummm ... Puff, The Magic Dragon .... yeah, that's it.
Jeezuz don't drive no rice rocket.Q: Did you know that they had automobiles in Jesus' Time?
A: Yes, the Bible says the disciples were in one Accord.
Jeezuz don't drive no rice rocket.
He had to take his mom's donkey to Jerusalem.As far as I know Jesus rode in on a donkey
He had to take his mom's donkey to Jerusalem.
And everyone was watching, too.He rode his Mom's ass?
And everyone was watching, too.
There's the scene in CHINATOWN where Jack Nicholson's character is confronting Faye Dunaway's character about the young woman in her house.Surely there's religious incest porn in the world. If Jesus is the Son of God who is himself God, and God gave Mary her conception...
Nothing there about part of it being added later.
Where's the biblical account of this miraculous shroud? Whose wrath brought down fire upon it, God's or Satan's?
You linked to the Frequently Asked Question page about the Shroud of Turin. There was nothing there about part of it being added later. Who told you that there was a part added later?It wasn't supposed to tell you about that, I gave a history of the shroud.
You linked to the Frequently Asked Question page about the Shroud of Turin. There was nothing there about part of it being added later. Who told you that there was a part added later?
That's from 2009. There have been more recent examinations. There's no evidence that the dated sample is any different from the rest of the shroud. Fabric repairs are never invisible to experts. Besides, the backside image is nearly 3" taller than the front.Here is one article. I've seen it many times. Also, it was exposed to a fire at one point.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/rel...d-be-genuine-as-carbon-dating-was-flawed.html
That's from 2009. There have been more recent examinations. There's no evidence that the dated sample is any different from the rest of the shroud. Fabric repairs are never invisible to experts. Besides, the backside image is nearly 3" taller than the front.
It is in fact not a photographic negative, since they didn't have that technology back then.Probably. There is new evidence coming out all of the time. It can't be proven either way scientifically. Historically it has compelling evidence, but can't be concluded either. Personally, I do believe it is the burial cloth of Christ. Have you looked at all of the evidence? The shroud is in fact a photographic negative. As you know, they didn't have that technology 2000 years ago.
It is in fact not a photographic negative, since they didn't have that technology back then.
It's also black and white. How primitive.
Where's the color? What color is the face? What color is the hair? What color are the coins on the eyes? The bloody areas have color, but nowhere else.You're not getting it. It IS a photographic negative and you're right, they didn't have that technology at that time. I believe God made it. I believe that when Christ resurrected, some kind of radiation or light was emitted creating the image.
Look at this:
https://www.shroud.com/examine.htm
Where's the color? What color is the face? What color is the hair? What color are the coins on the eyes? The bloody areas have color, but nowhere else.
Oh, I love that song