Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The bodies of a 53-year-old man and a 47-year-old woman were pulled from submerged vehicles in Cumberland and Wayne counties, respectively, McCrory told a news conference.
More than 30 deaths in the United States have been blamed on Matthew, which dumped more than a foot (30 cm) of water on inland North Carolina last week. Before hitting the southeast U.S. coast, the fierce storm killed around 1,000 people in Haiti.
McCrory said towns such as Princeville, Lumberton and Fair Bluff remained under water. In Princeville, believed to be the oldest incorporated African-American town in the United States, water surged to house roof lines on Thursday.
Although water is receding in many areas, the Lumber, Neuse, and Tar rivers are not expected to drop below major flood stage until Wednesday at the latest, McCrory said.
Florida will soon be submerged -- just after it goes Democratic! Coincidence, or... ??As Gaia tries to flush the infestation of Republican out to sea people get hurt!
When Boston's Logan airport cancels flights, I take severe weather warnings seriously.
"Wind gust of 95 mph recorded in Iowa"
Looking at the weather map for the Midwest scared me.
The weather announcer was freaked out.
Airports canceled flights.
"Thunderstorms are possible again Wednesday night into Thursday morning, some of which may be severe as well."
Why does the storm keep travelling, and not weaken ?
http://www.scscircle.com/news/id-26...her-wind-gust-of-95-mph-recorded-in-iowa.html
http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/7/71/710658/severe-thunderstorm-watch-issued-chicago-area-2
Dark skies
http://www.chicagotribune.com/
Hmmm.. cuz global average temp is up
Cuz parts of Antarctic are melting as never before
Science tries to predict the unknown based on facts
Politicians abuse facts for power
The oceans are dying.. but.. that's ok.. we still have the Kardasians
So what is the global average temperature now, compared to a hundred years ago? Has it ever dropped back down after the increase in the late 1900's?Global temperatures have remained flat for over a decade now. The only reason they appear up is that NASA changed its device calibrations.
Remember the famous hockey stick. That was outed, both by scientists involved and leaked email, as fudged data. There has been no warming of the eath during the Industrial Revolution outside normal climatic variation.
Both the Antarctic and Arctic ice caps are bigger than they were ten years ago. There has been a shift in the Antarctic, but almost no geologist or oceanographer will link this to global warming. Only climatologists whose grant money depends on global warming research do that.
At the time of "An Inconvenient Truth," those advocating global warming said the Arctic ice cap would be gone by now. It's bigger now than it was then. In fact, not a single prediction in that movie tied to a date certain has come true.
A scientific theory that keeps producing its own null hypothesis lacks validity. The only reason global warming continues to have any credence is because that's where the money is right now. If the government was giving grants to study why cows are turning purple, you can be sure there would be a whole flock of scientists claiming it was happening.
Stop believing what the popular press claims about science and read the scientific literature yourself. Then you'll know the truth.
In 2016??
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/pacific-typhoons-are-hitting-asia-with-more-intensity/
Ah.. but what the hell do they know!?? Frack them!
So what is the global average temperature now, compared to a hundred years ago? Has it ever dropped back down after the increase in the late 1900's?
No, it hasn't. Stick your hockey stick up your ass.
So what is the global average temperature now, compared to a hundred years ago? Has it ever dropped back down after the increase in the late 1900's?
No, it hasn't. Stick your hockey stick up your ass.
Your need to resort to vulgarity irrefutably demonstrates the intellectual bankruptcy of your position.
-
There was a tiny increase in global temperatures in the second half of the Twentieth Century. There has been no statistical correlation demonstrated between periods of increase and measures of carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere. Indeed, the amount of increase is well within pre-industrial fluctuations.
- (note that the two warm periods listed above were times of tremendous cultural advancement).
I suppose, given these facts, you'll now have little choice but to reply with additional vulgarity. Please do. I enjoy the laugh.
-.
We also need to pay heed to bhurry and his theory on cows. Farmers and ranchers must do there part in finding a way of growing crops that will curtail the creation of methane when eaten by livestock. Its know to have great effect on the greenhouse effect. Lets step back and look at the overall good this could do. Milk, beef containing less gas, less bull shit. No end.I haven't seen the graphs from the ice cores in a while but they might answer a lot of the questions about CO2 which just topped 400 ppm. We need forests to consume the CO2 otherwise the oceans will die and so will our World Order! The sea is the source of much of our sustenance. And soy bean farmers are cutting the Amazon Basin so fast that the rain forest is disappearing. Saudi Arabia might have to plant a few more dates goves to compensate for the CO2 imbalance due to burning their oil. And coal miners ought to plant trees on their strip mines.
The authors of the study make it clear that their results are being misrepresented. If you'd actually researched the topic, you would have known that.Wow. I had to go back all the way to page 28 of the Politics Board to find this little GEM.
It's almost like Global Warming, Climate Change, AGW...is bullshit.
All those "Peer-Reviewed" studies. All that "Settled Science"....Those "Hyper-Accurate' climate models...many have put under their pillow, or dropped to their knees to worship.
Well, it turns out...yeah...they're not so accurate. And maybe, just maybe, the earth isn't warming...i don't know...at all.
Pick your favorite news outlet, or use google, and you'll find stories like this....
(here's a tip: you won't find this in the NYT or Washington Post)
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/global-warming-who-are-the-deniers-now/
All the scorn, ridicule, and flat-out vitriol that's been heaped on "Deniers" (especially on this board)... I'm not waiting for an apology, because leftists don't apologize, but I'm going to enjoy the silence.
And the fact that this thread will soon be back on page 28....because it's now 'inconvenient'. The truth usually is to lefties.