Republican state senator pleads guilty to child sex trafficking charge: report

I won't be surpised. All the unqualified floozies and idiots serve under him. I weep for all the veterans who have died for their country to be served by a hypocritical manchild Caligula wannabe. Apologies to Emperor Caligula, he was actually loved by the masses.
 
I read an article this morning that says girls as young as 10 are being married off in the US. No wonder the rapist won the white house with so many with similar interests, just look at his supporters.
 
This is fucked up, but it certainly it wouldn't be the first time a Republican has been caught up in a child or gay sex scandal in recent times: Mark Foley and "Wide stance" Larry Craig come to mind.
 
This is not really as big a deal as it might sound like. The "child" is 17 years old, which is over the age of consent. The man is consorting with a male prostitute, and there is pornography involved, which is probably why the law is even involved. This is not to defend anybody, but it is to keep it in perspective.
 
This is not really as big a deal as it might sound like. The "child" is 17 years old, which is over the age of consent. The man is consorting with a male prostitute, and there is pornography involved, which is probably why the law is even involved. This is not to defend anybody, but it is to keep it in perspective.

Yeah, inviting someone underage who wants to work on your campaign to have sexual favors done for money is NO BIG DEAL.

:rolleyes:
 
Yeah, inviting someone underage who wants to work on your campaign to have sexual favors done for money is NO BIG DEAL.

:rolleyes:

I don't know what you mean by your post. The kid is not underage. When I saw the thread, I thought it was about a politician pimp, such as Barney Franks, who was dealing with children.
 
I don't know what you mean by your post. The kid is not underage. When I saw the thread, I thought it was about a politician pimp, such as Barney Franks, who was dealing with children.

17 is underage.

The state senator paid for sex with a 17 year old boy.

That's ok with you. It's not ok with me.

And please don't try to "whatabout" this...

It's disgusting, and if you can't even recognize that, you have some serious lack of morality.
 
This is not really as big a deal as it might sound like. The "child" is 17 years old, which is over the age of consent. The man is consorting with a male prostitute, and there is pornography involved, which is probably why the law is even involved. This is not to defend anybody, but it is to keep it in perspective.

You're in every single thread on this topic, we're aware of who you believe the victims are.
 
In Oklahoma the age of consent is 16, yes?

It is strange to see so many angry people on a sex web site.

Who cares what prople do in their personal liff if it is legal?
 
In Oklahoma the age of consent is 16, yes?

It is strange to see so many angry people on a sex web site.

Who cares what prople do in their personal liff if it is legal?

It wasn't legal, because it was prostitution, although most posters on this forum believe there should be no law against it.

And I'm not an angry person, at least not about this incident.
 
The charges the asshole pleaded guilty to were for child sexual trafficking, not prostitution.

That's what they called it, but it was strictly an encounter between two individuals, both of who are older than the age of consent
 
That's what they called it, but it was strictly an encounter between two individuals, both of who are older than the age of consent
You're free to outguess the judge, prosecution and defense attorneys, and the asshole pol who pleaded guilty. Have you read the court transcripts? Me neither. I assume a competent defense counsel would seek to reduce charges to a lesser crime like solicitation. Maybe "child sex trafficking" WAS the lesser charge. Sorry, insufficient data.
 
Back
Top