Homeland chief warns against anti-Muslim backlash

[busybody]

Homeland chief warns against anti-Muslim backlash
(AP) – 6 hours ago

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — The U.S. Homeland Security secretary says she is working to prevent a possible wave of anti-Muslim sentiment after the shootings at Fort Hood in Texas.

Janet Napolitano says her agency is working with groups across the United States to try to deflect any backlash against American Muslims following Thursday's rampage by Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, a Muslim who reportedly expressed growing dismay over the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The shootings left 13 people dead and 29 wounded.

Napolitano was in the United Arab Emirates on Sunday for talks with security officials and a meeting with women university students in Abu Dhabi.

[busybody]

1- when has there ever been? SHOW ME!

2- why shouldnt there be??????????????

[vetteman]

The Obama administration is hard at work to protect the enemy...as usual.

[busybody]

[vetteman]

We have two choices in life, to be feared and respected or become victims.

[vetteman]

Amen!


FT. HOOD ATTACK WAS TERRORISM

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN

In his nationally televised remarks following the horrendous killings at Ft. Hood, President Obama never mentioned the T word. The attack was an act "of violence." No mention of terrorism.

In fact, the Ft. Hood shooting is the first terror attack on American soil since 9-11. But Obama, reluctant to take the rap for inadequate protections against such attacks, is doing everything he can to make it look like an adult version of the Columbine school shootings. We are treated to stories about the killer's dread of being sent back to Afghanistan and his deformed personality.

But, the fact is that Major Nidal Malik Hasan jumped on a table, yelled "Alah Hu Akhbar" and began the shooting rampage that killed 13 people and wounded 30 more.

Ilana Freedman, CEO and Senior Analyst for the Gerard Group International, which provides intelligence analysis for business and homeland security, describes Hasan as a "lone wolf terrorist" who acts without apparent coordination with any other person or organization. But that does not make him any less of a terrorist.

The dividing line, of course, between a terrorist and a psychopathic killer is political motivation. His statements right before opening fire would indicate that Hasan was motivated by fanaticism and a commitment to Islamic fascism, even though President Obama bends over backwards to avoid saying so.

Obama's refusal to call the attack terrorism, and to heed the warning signs about the porous nature of our security system that allowed it to happen on a military base, recalls President Clinton's deliberate decision to downplay the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center. He did not visit the site of the attack and treated it as a crime, promising to find those guilty and punish them, rather than to attack the international groups that funded and enabled them.

There may be no groups behind Major Hasan's attack, but the fact that he was an officer in the Army, with full access to a military base and its arsenal of weapons, while holding the views he did, is the first indication of a laxity in security under President Obama. This attack did not take place in a shopping mall or a school, where security procedures are, understandably, relaxed. It happened on the highest security place of all - a military base! That the military failed to spot the possibility of an attack and had no measures in place to prevent it must be laid at the feet of the commander-in-chief of that military: President Barack Obama.

Many commentators have warned that the diminution of security and the weakening of our anti-terrorist protections would leave us vulnerable to be hit again. Now it has happened. And the president is doing everything he can to blur the distinction between murder and terrorism.

It was his failure to understand the difference between an act of war and a crime that undermined President Clinton's administration's anti-terror efforts and led directly to 9-11. It would appear that President Obama is going down the same road of denial and minimization of political harm. There may be casualties at Ft. Hood, but Obama is determined that his popularity will not be among them.

[off2bed]

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — The U.S. Homeland Security secretary says she is working to prevent a possible wave of anti-Muslim sentiment after the shootings at Fort Hood in Texas.

Janet Napolitano says her agency is working with groups across the United States to try to deflect any backlash against American Muslims

Which groups?

What exactly is DHS doing with these groups?

Why not try preventing Muslim backlash against us?

She can't prevent a wave of anti-Muslim sentiment that started in 1979 when Carter waffled over the hostages.

What is the Obama admin. afraid of - that we'll frighten terrorists into not striking us again?

[phrodeau]

Originally Posted by vetteman

Amen!


FT. HOOD ATTACK WAS TERRORISM

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN

In his nationally televised remarks following the horrendous killings at Ft. Hood, President Obama never mentioned the T word. The attack was an act "of violence." No mention of terrorism.

In fact, the Ft. Hood shooting is the first terror attack on American soil since 9-11. But Obama, reluctant to take the rap for inadequate protections against such attacks, is doing everything he can to make it look like an adult version of the Columbine school shootings. We are treated to stories about the killer's dread of being sent back to Afghanistan and his deformed personality.

But, the fact is that Major Nidal Malik Hasan jumped on a table, yelled "Alah Hu Akhbar" and began the shooting rampage that killed 13 people and wounded 30 more.

Ilana Freedman, CEO and Senior Analyst for the Gerard Group International, which provides intelligence analysis for business and homeland security, describes Hasan as a "lone wolf terrorist" who acts without apparent coordination with any other person or organization. But that does not make him any less of a terrorist.

The dividing line, of course, between a terrorist and a psychopathic killer is political motivation. His statements right before opening fire would indicate that Hasan was motivated by fanaticism and a commitment to Islamic fascism, even though President Obama bends over backwards to avoid saying so.

Obama's refusal to call the attack terrorism, and to heed the warning signs about the porous nature of our security system that allowed it to happen on a military base, recalls President Clinton's deliberate decision to downplay the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center. He did not visit the site of the attack and treated it as a crime, promising to find those guilty and punish them, rather than to attack the international groups that funded and enabled them.

There may be no groups behind Major Hasan's attack, but the fact that he was an officer in the Army, with full access to a military base and its arsenal of weapons, while holding the views he did, is the first indication of a laxity in security under President Obama. This attack did not take place in a shopping mall or a school, where security procedures are, understandably, relaxed. It happened on the highest security place of all - a military base! That the military failed to spot the possibility of an attack and had no measures in place to prevent it must be laid at the feet of the commander-in-chief of that military: President Barack Obama.

Many commentators have warned that the diminution of security and the weakening of our anti-terrorist protections would leave us vulnerable to be hit again. Now it has happened. And the president is doing everything he can to blur the distinction between murder and terrorism.

It was his failure to understand the difference between an act of war and a crime that undermined President Clinton's administration's anti-terror efforts and led directly to 9-11. It would appear that President Obama is going down the same road of denial and minimization of political harm. There may be casualties at Ft. Hood, but Obama is determined that his popularity will not be among them.

Hold the phone.

Hasad was at Walter Reed since 2002. He spent a lot more time in Bush's military than in Obama's.

So why didn't Bush take precautions, or at least leave Obama a note about this guy?

[vetteman]

Originally Posted by phrodeau

Hold the phone.

Hasad was at Walter Reed since 2002. He spent a lot more time in Bush's military than in Obama's.

So why didn't Bush take precautions, or at least leave Obama a note about this guy?

He probably did, but like everything else Obama knows best.

[busybody]

not only the noted KUNT, from the DHS

but the NOTED FAG,

So called "Gen" George I WANNA BE A MUSLIM ASSHOLE TERRORIST Casey says the same


WHERE HAS THERE BEEN ANY REPRISALS AGAINST MOOSEFUCKS?

And

THERE SHOULD BE!

[off2bed]

Originally Posted by busybody

not only the noted KUNT, from the DHS

but the NOTED FAG,

So called "Gen" George I WANNA BE A MUSLIM ASSHOLE TERRORIST Casey says the same


WHERE HAS THERE BEEN ANY REPRISALS AGAINST MOOSEFUCKS?

And

THERE SHOULD BE!

You missed the bigger point. He's apparently more worried about the safety of Muslim soldiers than he is about American soldiers.

Where was his concern for American soldiers when this Palestinian freak was yammering away to his buds about suicide bombers?

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Originally Posted by phrodeau

Hold the phone.

Hasad was at Walter Reed since 2002. He spent a lot more time in Bush's military than in Obama's.

So why didn't Bush take precautions, or at least leave Obama a note about this guy?

Very childish post this think that either man gets notes on individual soldiers...

The over-riding issue is how bowing to the alter of political correctness forces us to ignore the dots.

[busybody]

Originally Posted by off2bed

You missed the bigger point. He's apparently more worried about the safety of Muslim soldiers than he is about American soldiers.

Where was his concern for American soldiers when this Palestinian freak was yammering away to his buds about suicide bombers?

I dont think you can blame the PAST on him

The whole of US "society" is at fault

The same way the FBI didnt investigate ARAB men taking flying lessons before 9-11 cause of PC

The question is what to do now and going forward

Reading what DHS Kunt, FAG Casey and Colored Fool said, Im not optimistic

[vetteman]

Originally Posted by busybody

I dont think you can blame the PAST on him

The whole of US "society" is at fault

The same way the FBI didnt investigate ARAB men taking flying lessons before 9-11 cause of PC

The question is what to do now and going forward

Reading what DHS Kunt, FAG Casey and Colored Fool said, Im not optimistic

General UD will insist they not be discriminated against and that soldiers awareness will be enhanced by the knowledge they might be murdered from within their own ranks...the Constitution says so.

[busybody]

Is the following AP story made up, a parody, or a terrible error?

Homeland chief warns against anti-Muslim backlash
(AP) – 21 hours ago

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — The U.S. Homeland Security secretary says she is working to prevent a possible wave of anti-Muslim sentiment after the shootings at Fort Hood in Texas.

Janet Napolitano says her agency is working with groups across the United States to try to deflect any backlash against American Muslims following Thursday's rampage by Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, a Muslim who reportedly expressed growing dismay over the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The shootings left 13 people dead and 29 wounded.

One wonders whether Major Hasan — temporarily on sick leave — will return to his old quasi-official advisory role about our nation's security as a panelist for the Presidential Transition Task Force. Would now removing him from such future responsibilities be considered Islamaphobic?

[vetteman]

Originally Posted by busybody

Is the following AP story made up, a parody, or a terrible error?

Homeland chief warns against anti-Muslim backlash
(AP) – 21 hours ago

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — The U.S. Homeland Security secretary says she is working to prevent a possible wave of anti-Muslim sentiment after the shootings at Fort Hood in Texas.

Janet Napolitano says her agency is working with groups across the United States to try to deflect any backlash against American Muslims following Thursday's rampage by Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, a Muslim who reportedly expressed growing dismay over the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The shootings left 13 people dead and 29 wounded.

One wonders whether Major Hasan — temporarily on sick leave — will return to his old quasi-official advisory role about our nation's security as a panelist for the Presidential Transition Task Force. Would now removing him from such future responsibilities be considered Islamaphobic?

It's true, homeland security begins with a proper indoctrination in the politically correct and a proper disdain for the concept of self defense as a means of gaining the upper hand in a battle of survival, after all the Muslim's murderous actions are merely a representation of his frustration at the complete absence of respect for Sharia law and customs in the United States.

[busybody]

its unbelieveable that DHS talks about RIGHT WING "TERRORISTS" and never about MUSLIM TERRORISTS!

[busybody]

If they KNEW about this guy

and they did

how could he have been on a WH panel?

[vetteman]

Originally Posted by busybody

If they KNEW about this guy

and they did

how could he have been on a WH panel?

It's all about inclusiveness, who cares if they're sane?

[koalabear]

Originally Posted by vetteman

It's all about inclusiveness, who cares if they're sane?

They have to meet the quotas for the volunteer army.

[off2bed]

Originally Posted by vetteman

It's all about inclusiveness, who cares if they're sane?

Or even qualified?

[off2bed]

Mark Steyn on the subject: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1109/steyn110909.php3

[vetteman]

Originally Posted by off2bed

Mark Steyn on the subject: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1109/steyn110909.php3

General UD says the Constitution requires our army to sustain a fifth column movement within our military that murders our troops. Mark is right, what would be a bad day in Afghanistan is a glimpse through a terrible hole here at home in our war on terror strategy.

[Powertone]

Originally Posted by Frisco_Slug_Esq

The over-riding issue is how bowing to the alter of political correctness forces us to ignore the dots.

post of the year

[off2bed]

Originally Posted by Frisco_Slug_Esq

The over-riding issue is how bowing to the alter of political correctness forces us to ignore the dots.

The Army chief of staff said exactly that.

“It would be a shame — as great a tragedy as this was — it would be a shame if our diversity became a casualty as well.”