He did it for Islam !!!!

[Karen Kraft]

This just in:

The guy told co-workers that Muslims must take action against the war, that Muslims must not kill other Muslims, and that it was time to take action; he said that he was sure that the war would end quickly when Obama became president but when it didn't he said it was time to take action.

There you have it, folks: ISLAMIC TERRORIST.

[miles]

Originally Posted by Karen Kraft

This just in:

The guy told co-workers that Muslims must take action against the war, that Muslims must not kill other Muslims, and that it was time to take action; he said that he was sure that the war would end quickly when Obama became president but when it didn't he said it was time to take action.

There you have it, folks: ISLAMIC TERRORIST.

Fucking racist

[Karen Kraft]

Originally Posted by miles

Fucking racist

I'm waiting to hear that Bush made him do it.

[Karen Kraft]

BTW -

He's not really dead.

[miles]

Expect the ostrich media to downplay his Muslimness.

[Holy Devil]

Its common for people to fight for their religion. I know many American Jewish boys who served in the Israeli Defence Force. All religions are evil. Right?

[Karen Kraft]

Originally Posted by Holy Devil

Its common for people to fight for their religion. I know many American Jewish boys who served in the Israeli Defence Force. All religions are evil. Right?

Yeah, I'd go with "all religions are evil."

I like faith and a sense of values, but organized religion is a con game and a destructive force, on balance.

[miles]

Originally Posted by Holy Devil
Its common for people to fight for their religion. I know many American Jewish boys who served in the Israeli Defence Force. All religions are evil. Right?

You're a lying sack of shit.

[off2bed]

How many of you Muslim Apologists secretly support what Hassan did? I know what you're thinking. You should have thought of it yourselves, joining the Army, getting your hot little hands on a gun or two, and taking out all those Republican voters. I know Trouser feels that way, and I suspect the rest of you do, too.

http://www.breitbart.tv/co-worker-ft...oreign-policy/

[vetteman]

Originally Posted by off2bed

How many of you Muslim Apologists secretly support what Hassan did? I know what you're thinking. You should have thought of it yourselves, joining the Army, getting your hot little hands on a gun or two, and taking out all those Republican voters. I know Trouser feels that way, and I suspect the rest of you do, too.

http://www.breitbart.tv/co-worker-ft...oreign-policy/

He was probably a Bush hater.

[KylesAlts]

Originally Posted by Holy Devil

Its common for people to fight for their religion. I know many American Jewish boys who served in the Israeli Defence Force. All religions are evil. Right?

Fighting for your religion...gunning down innocents vs going after military targets...not even apples and oranges...that's apples and fucking cucumbers. Get real man.

[Karen Kraft]

Originally Posted by vetteman

He was probably a Bush hater.

Probably voted for Obama......

Oh wait: his cousin already said that the asshole voted for Obama, thinking that Obama would end the war quickly because "Muslims must not kill Muslims."

Says it all.

[off2bed]

These America haters also hate all religion, except that of Rev. Wright of course.

[Karen Kraft]

Originally Posted by off2bed

These America haters also hate all religion, except that of Rev. Wright of course.

I pretty much hate all organized religions, but I don't make my shoes explode on the plane.

[Byron In Exile]

Originally Posted by Karen Kraft

This just in:

The guy told co-workers that Muslims must take action against the war, that Muslims must not kill other Muslims, and that it was time to take action; he said that he was sure that the war would end quickly when Obama became president but when it didn't he said it was time to take action.

There you have it, folks: ISLAMIC TERRORIST.

You know, once we have sex, I'll be on your side.

I have mad skillz.

[MechaBlade]

Originally Posted by Byron In Exile

You know, once we have sex, I'll be on your side.

I have mad skillz.

I imagine sex with Karen is like sex with Paris Hilton. You rush to tell all you friends and they're just like "Really? Why?"

And you look down and say, "I don't know."

[Byron In Exile]

Originally Posted by MechaBlade

I imagine sex with Karen is like sex with Paris Hilton. You rush to tell all you friends and they're just like "Really? Why?"

And you look down and say, "I don't know."

I just... can't see it going down like that, really.

I'd not rush around telling anyone about it... it would be our dirty little secret.

Else, what's the point?

In fact, if it had already happened once, you wouldn't even know.

[MechaBlade]

Originally Posted by Byron In Exile

I just... can't see it going down like that, really.

I'd not rush around telling anyone about it... it would be our dirty little secret.

Else, what's the point?

In fact, if it had already happened once, you wouldn't even know.

What's the point of fucking Karen without telling anyone?

Rob would ask her on one of her insane "FDR was a Republican" threads "Hey, don't you have just a little bit of liberalness in you" and then you could chime in with "She did last night!" and everyone would share a hearty laugh until we all realized that you fucked Karen, and that means the terrorists won.

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Man-made disaster...


Religion had NOTHING to do with it.


We know the "official" story by heart, like the Skip Gates story...


Evil white profiling pig saw his chance to beat down a black man in a "stupid" manner...


Barack Hussein Obama, the American Left and the press that service them were more than comfortable with that story line.

[garbage can]

Originally Posted by Karen Kraft

This just in:

The guy told co-workers that Muslims must take action against the war, that Muslims must not kill other Muslims, and that it was time to take action; he said that he was sure that the war would end quickly when Obama became president but when it didn't he said it was time to take action.

There you have it, folks: ISLAMIC TERRORIST.

.

But Karen, the MSM says that he was a victim, that he was persecuted, drove him to do evil things. They all feel bad for the poor cocksucker.

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

He was pretty much justified.




It was George Bush's illegal war in Iraq...

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

While we’re carefully NOT rushing to any conclusions about the Fort Hood terrorist attack, it’s useful to reflect on the recent indictments of two North Americans for preparing to carry out attacks on a Danish newspaper. They are David Headley and Tahawwur Hussain Rana. Both are from Chicago; Headley is an American citizen, while Rana, a native Pakistani, is Canadian. They are charged with plotting attacks on the facilities and the employees of the Copenhagen Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, which famously published the famous cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed in 2005, provoking world-wide riots.

Headley, who changed his name from Daood Gilani three years ago (perhaps to make it easier to “pass” as an ordinary American), was in cahoots with an al Qaeda commander and another terrorist group in Pakistan, and was arrested when he attempted to fly there in early October. Rana was arrested two weeks later. Both were charged with conspiring to provide material support for the attacks, and Headley was accused of planning to participate. Bill Roggio provides the details here.

This story is unusually interesting, because these guys were using the United States as a base from which to stage attacks elsewhere. It’s a man-bites-dog story, the reverse of the usual one, in which foreign terrorists come to America to attack us. Rana and Headley weren’t driven by hatred of America, nor by American foreign policy; they were avenging what they took to be slurs on The Prophet.

In other words, the motivation was religious. I don’t think anyone could say, as some are saying today about Fort Hood, that “it’s not about Islam.” This plot to murder and maim Danish journalists and workers had everything to do with Islam. One could well imagine the terrorists opening fire in Copenhagen and chanting “Allahu Akbar.”

I’m all for waiting until all the evidence is in from Texas before reaching any conclusions, but that should apply to everyone. Notably to the FBI, which seems to have developed a conditioned reflex that requires the Bureau to announce, within seconds of any act of murder, “there is no evidence of terrorism.” Which, in this case, is ridiculous, since it was precisely that.

All of which brings us back to one of the nastiest problems we face: the indoctrination of Americans in this country. If you look beneath the surface of these plots and murders, you will often find that the actual or would-be killers have attended radical mosques. They don’t come to jihad by sitting quietly at home and reading the Koran. They hear sermons, they are guided in the paths of terror, and they choose to become terrorists. And in this country, those radical sermons and that incitement is traditionally treated as “protected speech.” It’s protected by the First Amendment, and its guarantee of freedom of religion.

http://pajamasmedia.com/michaelledee...eology-stupid/

Ironically, one person being quoted repeatedly in media reports as “shocked” at Hasan’s behavior is Faisal Khan, the former imam at the Muslim Community Center in Silver Springs, Maryland, where, the imam says, Hasan attended mosque on a daily basis. I say ironic because while there is no indication that Khan condones violence as a means to an end, there is evidence that Khan is an Islamist who shares the same political goals as the most notorious of terror organizations.

Khan is on the board of directors for the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). The ISNA is an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood — the movement which spawned al-Qaeda — and was at one time supportive of Palestinian terrorist organizations. The ISNA claims that they no longer have any ties to these groups, but at best, the kind of Islam promoted by many of its members is that of Saudi-style Wahhabism or so-called “moderate” Salafism. In other words, the promotion of political Islam and of the implementation of Islamic law remains a goal for many in the ISNA.

On the ISNA’s action alert website posted right below two condemnations of Hasan, the group asks for provisions of the Patriot Act to be amended to make it more difficult to prosecute those sending “humanitarian aid” to terrorist groups. This is no surprise given that the ISNA was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case — a case in which ISNA leaders were key in raising “humanitarian aid” from Muslims and then diverting that aid to the terrorists of Hamas.

Given the incompatibility of the goals of a religious state and that of American liberalism, one has to wonder just what the Hasan’s former imam means when he states that Hasan never gave any indication that he was an extremist.

Of course, many so-called “moderate” Salafis and Wahhabis now toe the official line of their Saudi Arabian financiers and decry terrorism in their pursuit of political Islam. (But of course they define acts of intentional violence against civilians in Israel as “not terror.”) Hasan’s noted Muslim piety and association with what most Americans would consider a radical philosophy might not be sufficient to raise alarms — all other things being equal.

However, several former colleagues now report that Hasan would occasionally voice odd and, in hindsight, alarming opinions. For instance, on Friday morning, NPR reported that at an academic conference Hasan deviated from his topic and:

instead of giving an academic paper he gave a lecture on the Koran. … [i]t seemed to be his own beliefs. … He talked about if you are a non-believer the Koran says you should have your head cut off.

Another colleague recalled that Hasan regularly called the War on Terror a “war against Islam.”

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/underst...ad-syndrome/2/

Well who would have guessed this?
Nidal Hassan sat on Obama’s national security panel last year.
Gawker dug up this document:

http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

News accounts are spotty; emotions run high; reliable information is rare; rumor abounds. Nevertheless, what are we to make of Maj. Malik Nadal Hasan’s horrific rampage at Ft. Hood, Texas, where in cold-blooded fashion he murdered 12, and wounded at least 31?

I think on the one hand we will see the familiar therapeutic exegesis, in which we hear of traumatic stress syndrome, justified and principled opposition to the Iraq and Afghan wars, generic mental illness, anger at being deployed overseas, or maltreatment from fellow soldiers due to his Muslim faith and various other efforts to “contextualize” the violence. (I am watching Major Hasan’s cousin on the news right now [I think], on spec, explain that the otherwise normal killer was a victim of bias and was ill at ease with firearms (after shooting over 40 victims and surviving the carnage). I cannot imagine the trauma of family members of the dead hearing such sentiments aired, or knowing that the killer apparently had voiced prior extremist sympathies.

On the other hand, one could instead see Hasan in a long line of killers and would-be murderers of the last decade that in some loose way express an Islamic anger at either American culture or the United States government or both, as a way of elevating their own sense of failure into some sort of legitimate cosmic jihad.

Prior to 2009, there have been at least 20 terrorist plots broken up after September 11, 2001—aimed at subways, malls, military bases, airports, bridges, and synagogues. Those foiled cabals are in addition to more common scattered murdering by freelancing angry killers, who in some very general way either evoked radical Islam, their own faith, the Palestinian cause, al-Qaedistic Islamism, or solidarity with worldwide Islam (from the Beltway sniper to the UNC and the San Francisco car murderers), and a number of lethal attacks on Jewish centers and temples resulting in numerous deaths (from the LAX attacks to the San Francisco and Seattle shootings).

In 2002, long ago, I wrote an article in which I called this al Qaedism and updated it with more recent examples in 2007.

In this year alone, aside from the recent mass murdering at Ft. Hood, there have been four more terrorist plots uncovered. Colorado resident Najibullah Zazi was recently indicted for conspiring to use explosives in the U.S., apparently as part of a plot to let off a bomb in New York on the anniversary of 9/11. In addition, North Carolina residents Daniel Patrick Boyd and Hysen Sherifi were arrested and charged with conspiring to murder U.S. military personnel at Quantico, Virginia. In Texas, Hosam Maher Husein Smadi—a 19-year-old Jordanian citizen who was in the U.S. illegally—was arrested and charged after he placed a would-be bomb near Fountain Place, a 60-story office tower in downtown Dallas.

Most recently in Boston, a Massachusetts man was arrested in connection with terrorist plots that included attacks on U.S. shopping malls and on two White House officials. Tarek Mehanna, 27, of Sudbury, Mass, was charged with plotting with other terrorists from 2001 to May 2008 to carry out overseas and domestic terrorist attacks— including killing shoppers and first responders at malls.

While there is sometimes talk of backlash and anti-Muslim hysteria since 9/11, I don’t think the number of Muslims attacked or killed is comparable to the number of non-Muslims killed by Muslims who evoked Islam in some way as a catalyst for their angers. Nor do we see comparable serial Christian, Hindu, or Jewish-inspired attacks either against mosques and Muslims or the policies of the United States government, either by single actors or more active and organized plotters. I do not quite then understand our official government statements that “the attacks of September 11th, 2001 and the continued efforts of these extremists to engage in violence against civilians has (sic) led some in my country to view Islam as inevitably hostile not only to America and Western countries, but also to human rights. This has bred more fear and mistrust.” In theory this sounds magnanimous and serious. In fact, I would like to see examples of “some” and serial incidents where very many Americans out of unwarranted furor have helped breed “fear and mistrust”.

Victor Davis Hanson
Pajamas Media

So where has Obama decided to fight the war?

The fucking hills of Afghaninam. Nero fiddles and enjoys the warmth...

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

After the 2007 Fort Dix plot, I wrote nearly three years ago the following chilling prognosis:

So, in the end, what are we to make of Fort Dix — yet another post-9/11 straw on an increasingly tired camel’s back?

We know that CAIR will neither seriously admonish Muslims charged with terrorist crimes nor introspectively examine the larger Islamic culture that seems to so incite the jihadist.

Such organizations will not do so as long as they can far more easily play on the self-doubt and guilt of the affluent and leisured citizen, who is supposed to believe that the dangers of radical Islam, both at the state and individual level, are mostly fictions inspired by our own prejudices. The sermonizing here in the United States by an Ayatollah Khatami, readily received by complaint listeners, and the satellite-beamed sophistry of Tariq Ramadan prove that well enough.

Most Americans will not remember Fort Dix in a week — just as they have forgotten Salt Lake City, San Francisco, Seattle, Lodi, Portland, and all the rest; just as they want out of Fallujah now and probably Kandahar tomorrow.

Yet, at some point, the jihadists will go too far. Many of us, erroneously as it turned out, thought that, after twenty years of serial provocations, radical Islam had done precisely that on 9/11.

Apparently not. But such forbearance, even at this late hour in the post-West, is still not limitless.

The more a Palestinian imam promises us our death, the more the Iranian president promises a world without America, the more these al Qaedists, like the most recent keystone clowns at Fort Dix, do their small part in trying to reify such mad rhetoric, and the more the sophisticated apologists assure us that we, not they, are the real threat, the more likely the sofa-sitting, channel-surfing American will some day very soon blow up, rather than be blown up.

Victor Davis Hanson

[jomar]

I predict the official conclusion will be bipolar disorder with delusions during a manic episode.