Corporate media scaring people into getting H1N1 vaccine.

[Mike_Yates]

I believe that the corporate/government controlled media has been using a scare tactics campaign into coercing people to get vaccinated against the H1N1 "swine" flu virus.

Knowing that the swine flu virus was created in a laboratory, and released very intentionally under the directive of the government and military industrial complex, I don't trust this vaccine, which probably existed many months/years before the H1N1 outbreak was reported in Mexico city back in April, with my life.

It seems as if this vaccine contains hidden ingredients to cause an eventual slow death to the Billions of people whom received it. If people refuse to take the vaccine, which is apparently what is happening, the government/NWO might make some modifications to it, to make it as, if not more virulent than the H5N1 "bird" flu virus. In order to terrify the masses into taking their fucking shot.

This probably has something to do with eugenics and/or global population control. If I were behind all this, I would put things in the vaccine which would cause mass sterilization. We have to stop people from having so many goddamn kids!

There are other ways of doing this without actually killing anyone.

Click this link. This event happened only a few months before the H1N1 virus was reported in Mexico city. But fortunately it was foiled by an accidental hero lab technician. This event was not reported by any of the corporate media.

I think the timing of these events is impossible to simply be a coincidence. There is something far more sinister happening than the state, and corporate-ran media wants us to believe. There is no telling what they are capable of, or what they have planned next.

If all my suspicions are correct, then much of humanity and civilization is being held hostage by some evil, shadowy governmental/corporate body aimed at wiping out Billions of people for purposes probably even more sinister than the notion of a global genocide of Billions of innocent people, caused by a deliberately released biological weapon. Blamed on a "natural mutation" of pre-existing viruses.

I believe there are some scientists whom have stated that they believe both the extremely deadly H5N1 "bird" flu virus, and the relatively mild H1N1 "swine" flu virus were both artificial laboratory concoctions, concluding from their study the genetic coding of the Two viruses.

Go google "Jane Burgermeister," a courageous investigative journalist whom also believes that there is something fishy about all this.

The Baxter vaccine contamination was not criminally investigated, nobody was charged with any crime, nor arrested, and nobody was even fired. The incident was swiftly hushed up, except the story leaked on the internet, and then that was that.

http://www.rotharmy.com/forums/front...-incident.html

[Byron In Exile]

Originally Posted by Mike_Yates

Knowing that the swine flu virus was created in a laboratory, and released very intentionally under the directive of the government and military industrial complex, I don't trust this vaccine, which probably existed many months/years before the H1N1 outbreak was reported in Mexico city back in April, with my life.

It seems as if this vaccine contains hidden ingredients to cause an eventual slow death to the Billions of people whom received it. If people refuse to take the vaccine, which is apparently what is happening, the government/NWO might make some modifications to it, to make it as, if not more virulent than the H5N1 "bird" flu virus. In order to terrify the masses into taking their fucking shot.

This probably has something to do with eugenics and/or global population control. If I were behind all this, I would put things in the vaccine which would cause mass sterilization. We have to stop people from having so many goddamn kids!

There are other ways of doing this without actually killing anyone.

Click this link. This event happened only a few months before the H1N1 virus was reported in Mexico city. But fortunately it was foiled by an accidental hero lab technician. This event was not reported by any of the corporate media.

I think the timing of these events is impossible to simply be a coincidence. There is something far more sinister happening.

You work for the FDA, don't you?

[Mike_Yates]

The flu may be used as the pretext/false flag for enacting these extreme, and unconstitutional protocols.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/REX-84

[Byron In Exile]

Originally Posted by Mike_Yates

The flu may be used as the pretext/false flag for enacting these extreme, and unconstitutional protocols.

But then, sometimes the flu is just the flu.

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

A potentially politically exploitable with a huge payoff...



It's amazing that people still want Nancy and Barney to run their health care after watching DC run the flu...

Very Scary!
Yiks

[Byron In Exile]

Originally Posted by Frisco_Slug_Esq

A potentially politically exploitable with a huge payoff...

It's amazing that people still want Nancy and Barney to run their health care after watching DC run the flu...

Very Scary!
Yiks

"Let's inject people with an untested vaccine and say we rescued them from annihilation!"

"What if they come down with leukemia as a result of the ASLV in the vaccine that we conveniently didn't test for?"

"Will that be after 2012?"

"Probably..."

"Then let's go!"

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Originally Posted by Byron In Exile

"Let's inject people with an untested vaccine and say we rescued them from annihilation!"

"What if they come down with leukemia as a result of the ASLV in the vaccine that we conveniently didn't test for?"

"Will that be after 2012?"

"Probably..."

"Then let's go!"

It's the same repeated pattern over and over whether it be stimulus checks, TARP, Health Care, but it is more pernicious when it comes to medicine and subjects like AIDS, West Nile Virus, the Bird Flu, the annual flu...

The Spanish Flu of 1918 is the most deadly in recent history. Twenty to 40 million people worldwide died from the disease. More than 36,000 people die from influenza each year in the U.S., and 200,000 others are hospitalized because of the illness. - Provided by The World Almanac 2009

Now, in the fashion of the UN's AIDS reporting, we see numbers projected based not on the testing and diagnoses of which flu strain the patient has but based upon the idea that every flu case should be counted as Swine Flu because the political reality is keeping the money flowing to the proper central state-approved labs and issues.
__________________
"As the 20th century drew to a close, the connection between hard scientific fact and public policy became increasingly elastic. In part this was possible because of the complacency of the scientific profession; in part because of the lack of good science education among the public; in part because of the rise of specialized advocacy groups which have been enormously effective in getting publicity and shaping policy; and in great part because of the decline of the media as an independent assessor of fact."
Michael Crichton, 2003 lecture at Caltech "Aliens Cause Global Warming."

[Byron In Exile]

Originally Posted by Frisco_Slug_Esq

It's the same repeated pattern over and over whether it be stimulus checks, TARP, Health Care, but it is more pernicious when it comes to medicine and subjects like AIDS, West Nile Virus, the Bird Flu, the annual flu...



Now, in the fashion of the UN's AIDS reporting, we see numbers projected based not on the testing and diagnoses of which flu strain the patient has but based upon the idea that every flu case should be counted as Swine Flu because the political reality is keeping the money flowing to the proper central state-approved labs and issues.

I've already posted this, but I'm not sure if you saw it, so...


"EMERGING VIRUSES: AIDS & EBOLA: Nature, Accident or Intentional?"
by Leonard G. Horowitz
Tetrahedron Inc. Rockport, MA 1996.

Foreword written by
W. John Martin, M.D., Ph.D.

All at once it seems, new viruses and virus-related diseases have threatened the health of humans and many animal species. How did this situation arise? Could it be that scientific studies and the emergence of new pathogens are not totally unrelated events? In writing this text, Dr. Horowitz has bravely questioned the extent to which scientific research and lax government oversight may have contributed to the present and coming plagues.

Open debate on this issue has been soundly discouraged. Opponents to open dialogue on the apparent relationship between early viral research and the latest germ discoveries argue that little good, and considerable harm, would come from a full disclosure of the facts. Exposing the truth, many believed, would likely: 1) tarnish the reputations of certain scientists, 2) make it more difficult to maintain science funding, 3) promote antigovernment sentiment, and 4) likely leave many issues unresolved. Others argued that it was simply too late to undo past mistakes. The fact that a better understanding of the new viruses' origins could lead to new treatment approaches, and, more importantly, to ways of preventing future outbreaks, was disregarded.

In considering the recent genesis of HIV and the Ebola viruses, Dr. Horowitz's book has explored three areas of great general and scientific interest: 1) the history of intensive research into the viral causes of cancer wherein readers can become familiar with the many, now questionable, virus transmission experiments, 2) the CIA and Department of Defense efforts to develop and defend against biological weapons of germ warfare. Here Dr. Horowitz should be especially congratulated for presenting well-researched little known facts that, though highly disturbing, are an important piece of history that may also bear heavily on the emergence of new viruses, and 3) vaccine production. Clearly, as anyone who reads this book will conclude, there is a great need for more open dialogue concerning the past and present risks inherent in the production of live viral vaccines. It is this topic that I am pleased to address here.

In 1798, Edward Jenner, an English physician advanced the use of cowpox (vaccinia) virus for immunizing humans against smallpox. He recognized that pathogens can behave differently while infecting different species. Indeed, he theorized that the vaccinia infection, which caused mild problems for cows, caused more severe ailments in horses. Only after adapting to cows, did vaccinia acquire limited infectivity for humans. The open sores that humans developed were far less severe than those induced by smallpox (variola) virus and essentially remained localized to the site of inoculation. Moreover, contact with vaccinia virus caused individuals to become virtually immune to the widespread disease caused by the smallpox virus. The success of vaccination is reflected in today's total elimination of smallpox as a disease.

Jenner's vaccination approach was followed in the twentieth century by Pasteur's use of rabies virus grown in rabbit's brain, and by Theiler's finding that he could reduce the effect of yellow fever virus by growing it in chicken embryos.

These successes set the precedent for other scientists to attempt to reduce the pathogenicity of other human and animal viruses by inoculating them into foreign species. Although we now look back with some disdain at the crudeness of early immunization experiments, such as the 1938 injections of polio virus, grown in mouse brains into humans, most people, including scientists, are unaware that we still use primary monkey kidney cells to produce live polio virus vaccine. Likewise, dog and duck kidney cells were used to make licensed rubella vaccines. Experimental vaccines, grown in animal tissues and intended for human use, were commonly tested in African monkeys, and it is likely that many of these monkeys were released back into the wild. This practice may have led to the emergence of primate diseases, some of which could have been transmitted back to humans.

Large numbers of rural Africans were also chosen as test recipients of experimental human vaccines.

In veterinary medicine, live viral vaccines have been widely used in domestic pets and in animals destined to become part of the foodchain. Undoubtedly, many cross-species transfers of viruses have occurred in the process. Even today, more than ten foreign species are used to produce currently licensed vaccines for cats and dogs.

The general acceptance of the safety of cross-species produced vaccines was supported in part by the generalization that there are inherent restrictions to the interspecies spread of disease. Thus, like vaccinia, most viruses are less harmful, but others can be far more dangerous after invading a foreign host. One dramatic example is that of the human infection caused by the herpes-type monkey B virus. This germ remains a rather harmless invader of monkeys, but place it in humans, and striking, severe, acute illness results which commonly ends in death. Likewise, a modified horse-measles-virus (morbillivirus) can be lethal to man. Other examples include the relatively mild dog distemper morbillivirus that was blamed for the death of some 3,000 lions in the Serengeti; the cat-adapted parvovirus that caused worldwide infection in dogs; and the mouse-derived lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus that caused severe hepatitis in monkeys.

It is the slow onset of disease that can be particularly baffling, especially when considering potential viral diseases transmitted through vaccines. Most acute diseases are relatively easy to recognize and amenable to further prevention. The delayed onset of chronic debilitating diseases that could be associated with animal viruses finding their way into a new species, e.g., man, are much more challenging. Here, the association between the germ and the symptoms it causes is obscured. Such an association would be especially hard to establish if the clinical features presented during the illness are poorly defined and mimic those of other known ailments. One example is the 1996 concern over the food-borne transmission of the prion disease scrapie. Initially carried by infected sheep, this protein caused bovine spongiform encepalopathy in "mad" cows. Then it was apparently passed on to humans resulting in juvenile Crutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

While in some cases disease transmission has been traced to certain vaccine lots, other times, even widely distributed licensed vaccines have been found to be contaminated. Yellow fever vaccine was known to contain avian leukosis virus (the retrovirus that causes leukemia in chickens - ed.). During World War II, batches of yellow fever vaccines were inadvertently also contaminated with hepatitis B virus. Current measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccines contain low levels of reverse transcriptase, an enzyme associated with retroviruses. Both Salk and Sabin polio vaccines made from rhesus monkeys contained live monkey viruses called SV40, short for the fortieth monkey virus discovered. As Dr. Horowitz documents, polio vaccines may also have contained numerous other monkey viruses, some of which may have provided some building blocks for the emergence of HIV-1 and human AIDS.

The finding of SV40 in rhesus monkey kidney cells, during the early 1960s, led to a rapid switch to African green monkeys for polio vaccine production. Kidney cells from African green monkeys, still being used to produce live polio vaccines today, may have been infected with monkey viruses that were not easily detectable. The monkeys used before 1980, for example, were likely to have been infected with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) - a virus genetically related to HIV-1. The origin of this virus and whether it contaminated any experimental vaccines are issues that need addressing.

What makes vaccines so troublesome is that their production and administration allows viral contamination to breach the two natural barriers that often restrict cross-species infections:

First is the skin. Direct inoculation of vaccines breaches this natural barrier and has been shown to produce increased infections in animals and humans. Such was the case when SV40 was injected intramuscularly in contaminated Salk polio vaccine. Later it was learned that Sabin's orally administered polio vaccines were safer since the live simian viruses were digested in the stomach and thereby inactivated. Additionally risky, when it comes to breaking the skin barrier, is the chance of transmitting viruses from one person to another through the use of unsterilized needles.

Second is the unique and natural viral surface characteristics that reduce the chance that viruses might jump species. The mixing of vaccine viruses with others found in the cells and tissues used to develop the vaccine can potentially lead to the development of new recombinant mutants that are more adaptive and have wider host range than either of the original viruses. This can especially happen when a live viral vaccine produced in cells from one species is then given to another species.

Also of concern is the transmission of new genetic information along with the vaccine virus. For instance, early adenoviral vaccines, produced in rhesus monkeys' kidney cells, developed to protect people against respiratory infections, incorporated parts of the SV40 virus that remained as a vaccine contaminant even after production of the vaccine virus was switched to human cells. Numerous other vaccines, especially those that were used in early field trials in Africa, should be analyzed for those genetic components which characterize today's monkey and human pathogens.

Unfortunately, this new awareness of potential problems with live viral vaccines has had little impact on the viral vaccine approval process. Seemingly, U.S. government agencies, principally the FDA, have been reluctant to impose additional testing requirements on vaccines once they are approved for use. In effect, government officials are given a single opportunity to decide on a new vaccine's safety. Even then, government regulators themselves may be denied certain critical information belonging to the vaccine industry. Specifically, FDA regulations are written so as not to compel the industry to reveal testing information not directly pertaining to the lots submitted for clinical use. The FDA is reluctant to admit its lack of knowledge about vaccines to the medical/scientific community. Yet, practicing physicians are expected to unquestionably endorse the safety of vaccines under all circumstances and to all individuals.

Aside from these bureaucratic barriers to viral vaccine safety assurance, there are additional major concerns. Since vaccine development information is considered proprietary - protected by nondisclosure policies - government officials and researchers must shield potential safety issues from public scrutiny. This censorship is rationalized by the all too persuasive argument that vaccines cannot be criticized lest the public become non-compliant in taking them. Finally, this silence is buttressed by the small number of people capable of critically evaluating vaccine manufacturing and safety testing procedures. In essence, health care professionals and the general public know little about the possible dangers of live viral vaccines.

As an illustration, the issue of possible simian cytomegalovirus (SCMV) contamination of live polio virus vaccines has been suppressed since 1972. On the eve of Nixon's war on cancer, a joint Lederle Corporation/FDA Bureau of Biologics study showed that eleven test monkeys, imported for polio vaccine production, tested positively for SCMV. The reluctance of the FDA to act on this matter was revealed in a corporate memo delivered the following year. Even in 1995, following a report to FDA officials concerning a patient infected with a SCMV-derived virus, no new in-house testing of polio vaccines for SCMV has occurred. Moreover, this author's specific requests for vaccine material to undertake specific testing, were denied on the basis of protecting "proprietary" interests.

This basic flaw in the regulatory process must be addressed - the FDA must be responsive to the medical-scientific community's need for accurate information regarding the potential hazards of products released for use in society. In the event that public health and safety concerns arise, industry should wave its right to maintain proprietary intelligence. This would enable the FDA to disclose more information concerning the safety of FDA regulated products to the medicalscientific community. Such a proposal should be included in the all pending and future FDA reforms.

It is against this background of possible risks of past viral vaccine studies, uncertain biological recombinants, bureaucratic censorship, a rising tide of medical consumerism in the information age, and an urgent need for legislative FDA reform, that Dr. Horowitz's work contributes. At minimum, what you are about to read exposes many important facts which, unfortunately, few people realize and all would be better off knowing. At best, this important text raises far greater hope that by knowing their origin, cures for the many complex emerging viruses, including AIDS, may be forthcoming.


Dr. W. John Martin, a Professor of Pathology at the University of Southern California, is also the Director of the Center for Complex Infectious Diseases in Rosemeand, California. Between 1976 and 1980, Dr. Martin served as the director of the Viral Oncology Branch of the FDA's Bureau of Biologics (now the Center for Biologics, Evaluation and Research), the government's principal agency in charge of human vaccines.

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Experts estimate that sickle-cell anemia—a chronic, inherited blood disorder characterized by crescent-shaped red blood cells—kills more children in Africa than HIV. It occurs primarily in people of African descent and can lead to episodic joint pain, fever, leg ulcers, and jaundice. According to experts, 90 percent of children born with sickle-cell anemia in Africa die before they are diagnosed and can get treatment, and half of those lives could be saved if sufferers received vaccines that would protect them from bacterial infections.

http://www.reuters.com/article/lates...s/idUSL9507400

But, you can get funding to fight AIDS since it is a socially approved disease by special interest groups, so we fight AIDS, and research a cure and label HIV the CO2 of the disease while diffy-Qing lifestyle and environment to zero...


__________________
"As the 20th century drew to a close, the connection between hard scientific fact and public policy became increasingly elastic. In part this was possible because of the complacency of the scientific profession; in part because of the lack of good science education among the public; in part because of the rise of specialized advocacy groups which have been enormously effective in getting publicity and shaping policy; and in great part because of the decline of the media as an independent assessor of fact."
Michael Crichton, 2003 lecture at Caltech "Aliens Cause Global Warming."

[Mike_Yates]

Are there any natural viruses which are actually capable of causing literal extinction of the human species? Or does a virus have to be altered/weaponized to have that ability?

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Originally Posted by Mike_Yates

Are there any natural viruses which are actually capable of causing literal extinction of the human species? Or does a virus have to be altered/weaponized to have that ability?

Think it through.

If it kills off all available hosts...

[Mike_Yates]

http://www.prisonplanet.com/40000-co...-kills-30.html

[Byron In Exile]

Originally Posted by Mike_Yates

Are there any natural viruses which are actually capable of causing literal extinction of the human species? Or does a virus have to be altered/weaponized to have that ability?

No. Viruses have been a part of the evolution of life for probably a billion years. Throughout human evolution, viruses have existed. And in all those millions of years, humanity has multiplied in spite of them, to the point where it is now the planet's finite resources, much more than viruses, which threatens them with extinction.

[AsiaSexHunter]

And we have never cured a single virus! We only make them less effective at hurting us.

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Originally Posted by AsiaSexHunter

And we have never cured a single virus! We only make them less effective at hurting us.

You got a lot of polio in Asia?

[Mike_Yates]

Originally Posted by AsiaSexHunter

And we have never cured a single virus! We only make them less effective at hurting us.

That is probably because in the eyes of Pharmaceutical corporations, the money is not in the cures, it's in the drugs and treatments for them. I'm sure they have the ability to cure nearly all of the viruses and diseases on Earth. But the CEO's, executives, and stockholders of these corporations wouldn't be so rich.

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Rachael Carson single-handedly rescue malaria from extinction...

[Mike_Yates]

This still isn't the bug which will lower the population. That will probably be some kind of weaponized hemorrhagic fever which will ultimately bring humanity from it's almost 7,000,000,000 "below 500,000,000" as inscribed on the Georgia guide stones. Probably within about Two or Three years into the pandemic/bio-warfare.

That kind false-flag event will definitely allow martial law to be fully implemented, the constitution to be torn up, forced relocation into "FEMA" death camps, war, and lay the foundation for Lucifer's New World Order world-government.

I guess that H1N1 didn't quite work out the way they wanted it to.

But a weaponized, airborne Ebola?.....

HAIL SATAN!