Walter Scott shooting

Scotts family tells Sharpton to fuck off. Al says he got better things to than hang out wiff niggaz.

LadyFunkenstein said:

The State executed this man for daring not play his role as a cog in the machine.

Click to expand...

LadyFunkenstein said:

FYP.

That was not "a cop" shooting someone, it was The State in action.

Click to expand...

chillywilly2 said:

I stand corrected, and agree

Click to expand...

Too friggin' funny...

...and still people wonder why individuals are so many times not fully held accountable for their individual actions.

"The State" made me do it, your honor...

Bhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...

Was this posted already?

"What wasn't shown in the video" Feidin Santana comes forward to describe

The link shows dash cam footage from the cop's car and a description of some of the surrounding events.

TL;DR = yup. the cop is still scum.

I have a question for all. If the cop didn't feel threatened, then why did he shoot? Even if he is a sociopath incapable of feeling hesitant (before) or remorseful (after) about taking a life, why escalate and give himself paperwork?

Was he just tired of running?

Thats my bet, got frustrated with chasing the fucker so he shot him

eyer said:

Too friggin' funny...

...and still people wonder why individuals are so many times not fully held accountable for their individual actions.

"The State" made me do it, your honor...

Bhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...

Click to expand...

Know why I don't engage with you? You have a very low IQ. You clearly don't understand my posts due to your low intelligence yet you keep practically begging me to argue with you. I can understand someone disagreeing with my take and stating an opinion as such, but you clearly don't even understand my take on the situation at all. You should have never come back after you left in a hissy fit. You have nothing to contribute on this thread nor on any other. See ya later, I am putting you on ignore for the crime of being dimwitted and boring.

LadyFunkenstein said:

Know why I don't engage with you? You have a very low IQ. You clearly don't understand my posts due to your low intelligence yet you keep practically begging me to argue with you. I can understand someone disagreeing with my take and stating an opinion as such, but you clearly don't even understand my take on the situation at all. You should have never come back after you left in a hissy fit. You have nothing to contribute on this thread nor on any other. See ya later, I am putting you on ignore for the crime of being dimwitted and boring.

Click to expand...

"The State made me do it, your honor"...

...bhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

feverplanet said:

I have a question for all. If the cop didn't feel threatened, then why did he shoot? Even if he is a sociopath incapable of feeling hesitant (before) or remorseful (after) about taking a life, why escalate and give himself paperwork?

Was he just tired of running?

Click to expand...

The other shoe will drop. But something is missing. What makes people go apeshit with a gun?

feverplanet said:

I have a question for all. If the cop didn't feel threatened, then why did he shoot? Even if he is a sociopath incapable of feeling hesitant (before) or remorseful (after) about taking a life, why escalate and give himself paperwork?

Was he just tired of running?

Click to expand...

That's what it looks like. Scott had a head start and the cop caught him one time. He probably didn't have the wind for another sprint.

The North Charleston PD is 80% WHITE, per 2007 data, 79% per 2012 data.

JAMESBJOHNSON said:

Was Scoot's car stolen? It wasn't his wheels. He told the cop I'M BUYIN IT but had no registration or nuthin on it.

Oh! And 80% of the cops in that town are Darkies.

THis lynching is falling apart like Gook sewing.

Click to expand...

bronzeage said:

That's what it looks like. Scott had a head start and the cop caught him one time. He probably didn't have the wind for another sprint.

Click to expand...

Yes but do you think the officer actually thought about it? Pant, pant, I can't run anymore, better just kill him. ?

LadyFunkenstein said:

Yes but do you think the officer actually thought about it? Pant, pant, I can't run anymore, better just kill him. ?

Click to expand...

We know he was thinking afterwards: He went back, picked up the taser, and placed it near Mr Scott.

bronzeage said:

That's what it looks like. Scott had a head start and the cop caught him one time. He probably didn't have the wind for another sprint.

Click to expand...

And he obviously didn't have the brains just to let him go and to have the registration traced on the Mercedes the guy was driving--and the car fingerprinted if it turned out to have been stolen. The cop must have been living in a bubble protected from any news not to know he didn't want to be swept up in this, inconvenient video or no inconvenient video. (hint, hint, the rest of you SC cops.)

On the flip side, much of this is happening because the agitators are conditioning black guys to mouth off and somehow resist (even the gentrified black UVa student mouthed off in a challenging and obscene way when ABC officers confronted him outside a Virginia bar that he was too young to enter). In the long run, this will help get the police under control. In the short run, there are some black guys stepping up to be martyrs--egged on by the agitators. (I don't see Sharpton accosting any policeman for the opportunity to be shot.)

LadyFunkenstein said:

Yes but do you think the officer actually thought about it? Pant, pant, I can't run anymore, better just kill him. ?

Click to expand...

I think the cop got frustrated and in his warped mind thought why not just shoot him to end the situation. He'd already chased and tazed Scott once. Now he was on the run again with the likelihood he would have to fight Scott when he caught him again. The cop probably in that moment saw it as the easiest way to end the situation.

Pookie said:

I think the cop got frustrated and in his warped mind thought why not just shoot him to end the situation. He'd already chased and tazed Scott once. Now he was on the run again with the likelihood he would have to fight Scott when he caught him again. The cop probably in that moment saw it as the easiest way to end the situation.

Click to expand...

well, it ended that situation...and it started a Whooooole new one

sr71plt said:

And he obviously didn't have the brains just to let him go and to have the registration traced on the Mercedes the guy was driving--and the car fingerprinted if it turned out to have been stolen. The cop must have been living in a bubble protected from any news not to know he didn't want to be swept up in this, inconvenient video or no inconvenient video. (hint, hint, the rest of you SC cops.)

On the flip side, much of this is happening because the agitators are conditioning black guys to mouth off and somehow resist (even the gentrified black UVa student mouthed off in a challenging and obscene way when ABC officers confronted him outside a Virginia bar that he was too young to enter). In the long run, this will help get the police under control. In the short run, there are some black guys stepping up to be martyrs--egged on by the agitators. (I don't see Sharpton accosting any policeman for the opportunity to be shot.)

Click to expand...

What do you mean "we", white man?

bronzeage said:

What do you mean "we", white man?

Click to expand...

I guess by thinking you see the word "we" in what I posted, you started reading the post from blind prejudice, right?

sr71plt said:

And he obviously didn't have the brains just to let him go and to have the registration traced on the Mercedes the guy was driving--and the car fingerprinted if it turned out to have been stolen. The cop must have been living in a bubble protected from any news not to know he didn't want to be swept up in this, inconvenient video or no inconvenient video. (hint, hint, the rest of you SC cops.)

On the flip side, much of this is happening because the agitators are conditioning black guys to mouth off and somehow resist (even the gentrified black UVa student mouthed off in a challenging and obscene way when ABC officers confronted him outside a Virginia bar that he was too young to enter). In the long run, this will help get the police under control. In the short run, there are some black guys stepping up to be martyrs--egged on by the agitators. (I don't see Sharpton accosting any policeman for the opportunity to be shot.)

Click to expand...

We don't want the police under control, we want them making darkies shit their pants.

sr71plt said:

the agitators are conditioning black guys

Click to expand...

Please tell us more about your race war conspiracy.

But leave out the anal rape parts.

If you are able.

sr71plt said:

And he obviously didn't have the brains just to let him go and to have the registration traced on the Mercedes the guy was driving--and the car fingerprinted if it turned out to have been stolen. The cop must have been living in a bubble protected from any news not to know he didn't want to be swept up in this, inconvenient video or no inconvenient video. (hint, hint, the rest of you SC cops.)

On the flip side, much of this is happening because the agitators are conditioning black guys to mouth off and somehow resist (even the gentrified black UVa student mouthed off in a challenging and obscene way when ABC officers confronted him outside a Virginia bar that he was too young to enter). In the long run, this will help get the police under control. In the short run, there are some black guys stepping up to be martyrs--egged on by the agitators. (I don't see Sharpton accosting any policeman for the opportunity to be shot.)

Click to expand...

Big fan of "summary justice", I see. That US Constitution sure comes in handy for wiping your ass, doesn't it?

http://i1239.photobucket.com/albums/ff502/Soonyigump/Moar%20Sensitive_zpsra7qlqyu.jpg

Lancecastor said:

Please tell us more about your race war conspiracy.

But leave out the anal rape parts.

If you are able.

Click to expand...

Not having a race war consipiracy, there's nothing to tell.

Nice to see both that you continue to be a gay basher and that the folks of GB are comfortable with gay bashing, though. I was sure there was somewhere on Literotica where you folks gathered. Obviously it's here.

http://thefederalistpapers.integratedmarket.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/163.jpg

Friggin' coppers now confiscating homeless men's Big Macs.

sr71plt said:

...even the gentrified black UVa student mouthed off in a challenging and obscene way when ABC officers confronted him outside a Virginia bar that he was too young to enter....

Click to expand...

Cite?
I'm curious, because even the pub owner who turned him away from the door and witnessed the arrest says he was polite.

about_average said:

Cite?
I'm curious, because even the pub owner who turned him away from the door and witnessed the arrest says he was polite.

Click to expand...

Well I live in Charlottesville and have seen coverage of this ad naseum. You can find it yourself on the Daily Progress Web site. No account questions that he used obscenities when confronted by the ABC cops. He goes to trial on 28 May (if the governor-directed state investigation doesn't just throw it all out before then). You can follow the proceedings of that directly. What's not in contention by anyone is that he wanted to get into the bar when he wasn't old enough to be drinking there and the bar was closed at the time to anyone not of age. What he has going for him is that the bar owner (who denied him entrance) said he didn't argue about being turned away and there's no evidence he'd already been drinking. (He gave incorrect information off his ID, though, which apparently was overheard by the ABC cops who then wrongly assumed it was false ID). What should come out in the trial is whether he realized the bar was open only to those of age at that time.

This is a case, I think, of a state agency's undertrained and overdiligent cops moving without enough evidence to do so (not as egregious as they did a year and a half before in C'ville when they stormed a girl's car out of uniform to arrest her for buying beer when what she bought was sparkling water--and then were offended that she tried to drive away from them).

But if the UVa student hadn't gone up in their face, he wouldn't have found himself on the ground. Doesn't mean he was wrong to be offended; it means he was conditioned by all that's been going on to leap to his defense with accusatory language (he isn't from the streets. He's from a rich, privileged family). Again, maybe necessary to get the cops (state agency cops in this case; not the city cops or the county cops or the university cops) under control in the long run. But the result of being conditioned to volunteer for stepped up confrontation in the short term.

There are videos too. You can find them yourself.

And it doesn't have a thing to do, for Lancecastor and his gay-bashing cohorts on the GB's benefit and possible disappointment, with anyone involved being gay. Nor does my being gay and posting this have anything to do with Lancecastor and cohorts' gay-bashing me in response other than that you on the GB seem to be comfortable with posters doing that.

"been conditioned to..."

"agitators are conditioning them..."

"They're being hopped up...egged on..."

http://i.imgur.com/npa5yMn.gif

Where have I heard this shit before? Kinda sounds like, "our negroes were all fine an' happy an' docile until y'all troublemakers from up north started comin' down hyar an' making trouble."

Yeah, miss me on that "conditioning." Gonna file that one right up there with "gentrified black."

Back to the yap, as you were.