Republican House Intel committee exhonerates Obama, Hillary, Rice

Moore is wandering around a UK hospital. He asks the patients how much it is going to cost them to get done whatever they are getting done.

Zero.

He finally finds the Cashier's office. He asks the cashier how much money was brought in during the day. Zero. The cashier only gives out money to patients to cover their mass transportation expenses to get to the hospital and back home.

Watch and learn.

You only see what he wants you to see. It's a movie in documentary format, not a film.
 
Ok, what am I looking at and why in reference to what?

Pick any cause of death you like in the top right hand box, it ranks countries by rate of death per 100,000 for that cause. Interesting stuff.
 
Pick any cause of death you like in the top right hand box, it ranks countries by rate of death per 100,000 for that cause. Interesting stuff.

Agreed, but the validity of the site is a bit iffy:
OUR*DATA: We use the most recent data from these primary sources: WHO, World Bank, UNESCO, CIA and individual country databases for global health and causes of death.
We use the CDC, NIH and individual state and county databases for verification and supplementation for USA data.

Feels like execu-speak...
 
They just can't admit they were duped, they were wrong and they are stupid.

That's why 99% are from failed marriages.

Who could live with such vile imbeciles?

They lack the courage to admit they were mistaken. Conservatives have become a nation of Vettemen, lacking character and integrity.
 
Pick any cause of death you like in the top right hand box, it ranks countries by rate of death per 100,000 for that cause. Interesting stuff.

Especially when you consider ethnicity and people that die of other things before they have a chance to contract late in life, degenerative diseases.

Tell us again how people flock from the United States to Canada and the UK for the superior medical care.
 
Especially when you consider ethnicity and people that die of other things before they have a chance to contract late in life, degenerative diseases.

Tell us again how people flock from the United States to Canada and the UK for the superior medical care.

Plenty go from the US to Canada for medical treatment. They run buses from San Diego into Mexico for people to get treatment.
 
Plenty go from the US to Canada for medical treatment. They run buses from San Diego into Mexico for people to get treatment.

For things that the US government in its infinite wisdom has not "approved" or for procedures that are cheaper because the Democrat-protected Tort industry for ambulence chasers like King Orfeo has made malpractice insurance cheaper or unnecessary elsewhere.

No one goes to from the US to any of those places for a Catscan or an MRI. 6 months for an MRI in Canada if you can get one at all. I can get today if needed.
 
You can get a MRI because you can pay for it

Not everyone can. What should they do? If they are lucky they can get across the border and find help they can afford.

When you guys on the right take over, what happens to the guys who can't afford care? I am on the level with you here, I really want you to explain a way of dealing with this better than the tax payers sharing the cost of treatment. That is all that socialized medicine is. How would you guys do it?
 
For things that the US government in its infinite wisdom has not "approved" or for procedures that are cheaper because the Democrat-protected Tort industry for ambulence chasers like King Orfeo has made malpractice insurance cheaper or unnecessary elsewhere.

No one goes to from the US to any of those places for a Catscan or an MRI. 6 months for an MRI in Canada if you can get one at all. I can get today if needed.

You are a fool.

Plain and simple.

Canadians have many choices when it comes to ct scans and MRIs if you don't want to wait.

Talk about a low information southern hick. :rolleyes:

http://www.canmagnetic.com/scans-rates/

http://www.canadadiagnostic.com/
 
What does the right wing want to do about workers who have no jobs?

Since Reagan and the right wing have started our country down this path that we are on, I would like to know what they are going to do about the workers who have no job and no chance of finding a job.

Right now the workers are being replaced by the factories in china, but automation would have taken the jobs soon anyway. What is the right's answer to the lack of jobs ?
Where do these people go, they have no food , shelter or hope for the future. And it's not their fault. Wages have been frozen for the working class for the3 last thirty years.
So they are already beat down pretty bad. The right won't fix roads or repair or upgrade anything if it takes taxes to do it. The poor can't pay taxes and the rich refuse to.

What is the answer that the right wingers seem to know but we lessers on the left can't see.

If there is a right winger here who understands where they are being led, could he or she please take a moment and explain it to me. Talk to me like I am a five year old child. Keep it simple and tell me what you are for, I know what you are against.
 
Regardless of where one stands on politics, questions remain:

The outpost was not secured despite ample, glaring evidence of the need to do so. Why? Sure, Hillary is a political hack who could not be expected to monitor security at Benghazi, but somebody was responsible.

Why was Stevens there?

Was Panetta dishonest in saying he told Obama on Sept 11, 2012 it was an "attack by terrorists"? Why would Panetta lie at this juncture?

Obama was not in the situation room, so what precisely did he do that night before going to bed and the next morning going to a fundraiser in Vegas?

Were the defenders at Benghazi dishonest when they said they were told to stand down by the local CIA operative?

Who came up with the ludicrous story that an Internet video catalyzed the attack in order to preserve Obama's campaign narrative (he was going around the nation claiming terrorism was "on the run")?

Who told Rice to lie about the video on 5 Sunday talk shows?
 
If there is a right winger here who understands where they are being led, could he or she please take a moment and explain it to me. Talk to me like I am a five year old child. Keep it simple and tell me what you are for, I know what you are against.

The answer is always: 'UP'

It's the same answer for all parties, affiliations, and politics.
 
Why was Stevens there?
The "consulate in Benghazi was a "consulate in name only", a cover for a CIA weapons distribution center where CIA operatives met with anti-Qaddafi leaders. Secretary of State Clinton wanted to turn this into a "real" consulate.


Were the defenders at Benghazi dishonest when they said they were told to stand down by the local CIA operative?
Yes. When put under oath, they said they were NOT told to "stand down", as I explained to you yesterday. It wasn't the answer you wanted to hear, so like the gutless son of a whore you are, you simply repeat the question over and over.
 
Amen. Better luck next smear!

It will be fun to watch come January. If the Repubs are smart they will pass good legislation in both houses from immigration reform to repairing the tax code. Put it all on Obama's desk and wait for the veto's. Obama will wear out a few pens over the next couple of years, and it will be tough for another democrat to get in the white house if the repubs do a good enough job of showing what true obstructionists the dems are. But, will they do the smart thing?
 
Seriously, I'm gonna cry if the Navy SEAL guys lied to us!!
I can accept politicians lying, that's normal

Are you sure those guys were questioned at the hearings? Or was it their superiors?
 
It will be fun to watch come January. If the Repubs are smart they will pass good legislation in both houses from immigration reform to repairing the tax code. Put it all on Obama's desk and wait for the veto's. Obama will wear out a few pens over the next couple of years, and it will be tough for another democrat to get in the white house if the repubs do a good enough job of showing what true obstructionists the dems are. But, will they do the smart thing?

Don't be silly. "Reform teh tax code" is stuff they say to get elected. Once the new Congress is seated in January, they'll revert to form and enact legislation to #PunishTheSluts. I suspect we'll see a slew of "personhood" legislation and a host of federal anti-abortion bills.
 
Regardless of where one stands on politics, questions remain:

The outpost was not secured despite ample, glaring evidence of the need to do so. Why? Sure, Hillary is a political hack who could not be expected to monitor security at Benghazi, but somebody was responsible.

Why was Stevens there?

Was Panetta dishonest in saying he told Obama on Sept 11, 2012 it was an "attack by terrorists"? Why would Panetta lie at this juncture?

Obama was not in the situation room, so what precisely did he do that night before going to bed and the next morning going to a fundraiser in Vegas?

Were the defenders at Benghazi dishonest when they said they were told to stand down by the local CIA operative?

Who came up with the ludicrous story that an Internet video catalyzed the attack in order to preserve Obama's campaign narrative (he was going around the nation claiming terrorism was "on the run")?

Who told Rice to lie about the video on 5 Sunday talk shows?

HMMMMMMMMMMM.

This sounds like a mystery for

https://31.media.tumblr.com/732deab953ac128a50da053e03e390b1/tumblr_mqbejlg8ts1stovwyo1_500.gif
 
Back
Top