 |
|
 |
| - Free Speech, No Spam! - |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
02-28-2013, 07:45 AM
|
#1
|
|
Loves Spam
jeninflorida is offline
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,475
|
obama sequestration plan = joke
we all know that obama is a joke. only obama is raping America
okay to the point. Sequestration, bring it on! Finally, YES WE CAN!
this is awesome news! I hope the Reps don't back down to the Marxist regime
just say no to the corrupt regime, of the obama asshats
ps NOTHING will happen with this obama bullshit drama
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 08:32 AM
|
#2
|
|
Guest
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 08:48 AM
|
#3
|
|
Realizations
hogjack is offline
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gyrtb, Romania
Posts: 31,749
|
The President wanted this and has got it. Even his most staunch supporters can see through this Drama Queen crap.
The President has no shame when it comes to the crap he spews on a daily basis.
__________________
People I Want to Fuck: - 0 -
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 10:00 AM
|
#4
|
|
Pragmatic Metaphysician
mercury14 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 22,144
|
What exactly is the message from the right? Is the sequester good or bad? I'm hearing a lot of voices saying that the sequester is good (after they spent 6 months saying the exact opposite), and that Obama wanted it. But the fact that Obama wants something good still means he wants something bad.
And if Obama opposes the sequester, well that also means he wants something bad.
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 10:07 AM
|
#5
|
|
Literotica Guru
VaticanAssassin is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: On the edge of a mountain, in the desert, overlooking the ocean.
Posts: 12,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mercury14
What exactly is the message from the right? Is the sequester good or bad? I'm hearing a lot of voices saying that the sequester is good (after they spent 6 months saying the exact opposite), and that Obama wanted it. But the fact that Obama wants something good still means he wants something bad.
And if Obama opposes the sequester, well that also means he wants something bad.
|
On your same logic;
For months you have been complaining of obstructionism. Yet The Republicans voted to approve Obama's plan of sequester in the spirit of working together. A plan Obama created and signed in to law. Now you want to blame it on the Republicans for agreeing with Obama??????? Knowing it is Obama's plan is it good or bad?
She is not the only one in this thread that wants to eat the cake.
__________________
And now for the disclaimer: If you're easily offended, do not read my posts. If you don't think jokes about minorities, gays, politicians, religion, celebrities, athletes, etc. are funny, do not read my posts. If you find cursing distasteful, fucking Do not read my posts. If you read my posts, and then tell me you're offended, then you can go eat a bag of dicks cuz you shoulda heeded my disclaimer
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 10:09 AM
|
#6
|
|
Guest
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 10:12 AM
|
#7
|
|
Guest
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 10:14 AM
|
#8
|
|
Pragmatic Metaphysician
mercury14 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 22,144
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vetteman
One thing to note, the sequestration plan originally sold to Boner had no proposal for new taxes, Obama double crossed Boner and added that requirement later, and then tried to blame all of the negative consequences on the Pubs.
|
The original sequestration plan also didn't mention cuts. It mentioned "deficit reduction". |
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 10:17 AM
|
#9
|
|
Pragmatic Metaphysician
mercury14 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 22,144
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaticanAssassin
On your same logic;
For months you have been complaining of obstructionism. Yet The Republicans voted to approve Obama's plan of sequester in the spirit of working together. A plan Obama created and signed in to law. Now you want to blame it on the Republicans for agreeing with Obama??????? Knowing it is Obama's plan is it good or bad?
She is not the only one in this thread that wants to eat the cake.
|
I didn't blame it on Republicans. I've always said that since it was an agreement both parties made and voted for that they should share responsibility for it.
Last edited by mercury14 : 02-28-2013 at 10:19 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 10:19 AM
|
#10
|
|
Literotica Guru
VaticanAssassin is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: On the edge of a mountain, in the desert, overlooking the ocean.
Posts: 12,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mercury14
I didn't blame it on Republicans. I've always said that since it was an agreement both parties made and voted for that they should share responsibility for it.
|
I assumed you did, so if I am wrong I am wrong.
__________________
And now for the disclaimer: If you're easily offended, do not read my posts. If you don't think jokes about minorities, gays, politicians, religion, celebrities, athletes, etc. are funny, do not read my posts. If you find cursing distasteful, fucking Do not read my posts. If you read my posts, and then tell me you're offended, then you can go eat a bag of dicks cuz you shoulda heeded my disclaimer
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 10:20 AM
|
#11
|
|
Pragmatic Metaphysician
mercury14 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 22,144
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaticanAssassin
I assumed you did, so if I am wrong I am wrong.
|
I'm saying it's a craven act for Republicans to blame something they all voted for on the Democrats. Likewise any Dem who is solely blaming Republicans is making the same act of cowardice. |
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 10:25 AM
|
#12
|
|
~Armed and Fuzzy~
koalabear is offline
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: over there----->
Posts: 102,608
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mercury14
The original sequestration plan also didn't mention cuts. It mentioned "deficit reduction".
|
*views post*
__________________
GBers are like Bran Muffins, not much substance, yet they produce a lot of shit. "^^"
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 10:28 AM
|
#13
|
|
Literotica Guru
VaticanAssassin is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: On the edge of a mountain, in the desert, overlooking the ocean.
Posts: 12,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mercury14
I'm saying it's a craven act for Republicans to blame something they all voted for on the Democrats. Likewise any Dem who is solely blaming Republicans is making the same act of cowardice.
|
A majority of the public, a majority of the media, and all elected democrats are doing everything in their power to blame this on Republicans. Better yet, it is working. The public as a whole is stupid, we all know that.
But if on this one example of Republicans going along with Obama's plan that will hurt the nation gets flipped around on them.... Then why in the hell would they ever try to compromise with the son of a bitch again?
__________________
And now for the disclaimer: If you're easily offended, do not read my posts. If you don't think jokes about minorities, gays, politicians, religion, celebrities, athletes, etc. are funny, do not read my posts. If you find cursing distasteful, fucking Do not read my posts. If you read my posts, and then tell me you're offended, then you can go eat a bag of dicks cuz you shoulda heeded my disclaimer
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 12:04 PM
|
#14
|
|
Pragmatic Metaphysician
mercury14 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 22,144
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaticanAssassin
A majority of the public, a majority of the media, and all elected democrats are doing everything in their power to blame this on Republicans. Better yet, it is working. The public as a whole is stupid, we all know that.
But if on this one example of Republicans going along with Obama's plan that will hurt the nation gets flipped around on them.... Then why in the hell would they ever try to compromise with the son of a bitch again?
|
America will blame Republicans more because America wants a balance of cuts and tax hikes to address the deficit, not solely one or the other. Polls show that the balanced approach has support approaching 80% but one party wants only cuts.
And I agree, I think we need both. And both elements need to be addressed in such a way that minimizes harm to the economy. The sequester is dumb because it doesn't go through the budget and cut items where economic impact will be minimal, it just makes across-the-board department cuts. No business for example would ever make cuts in this fashion.
Not to mention the sequester cuts spending levels but doesn't address spending growth. It's just stupid. |
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 01:13 PM
|
#15
|
|
Guest
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 01:17 PM
|
#16
|
|
Pragmatic Metaphysician
mercury14 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 22,144
|
Did Vette ever say whether or not he's in favor of the sequester going through?
|
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 01:29 PM
|
#17
|
|
I'm so yuge!
BoyNextDoor is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,246
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vetteman
The man is a national embarrassment. I've never seen a bigger bullshitter in the White House in my lifetime. Even the leader of the Black Chamber of Commerce who voted for Obama twice is saying he now resents Obama's "socialist" schemes of wealth distribution, saying his ideas are all wrong for America.
|
"I am not a crook ..." RMN |
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 01:33 PM
|
#18
|
|
I'm so yuge!
BoyNextDoor is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,246
|
Sequestration is not a very big thing. All the hype is a bunch of crap.
The really interesting conversation is going to come when the budget authority runs out and the Congress will have to pass a 12th to keep the lights on or, dare I say it, there is an actual budget. I believe March 27th is the day the lights go out in DC.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
