Who Told Susan Rice To Lie To The American People?

[cjh]

I wonder if it was the same people who convinced Colin Powell into lying about weapons of mass distruction?

[Squibbs]

Originally Posted by cjh

I wonder if it was the same people who convinced Colin Powell into lying about weapons of mass distruction?

Distrustion or destruction?

[Sean]

Originally Posted by cjh

I wonder if it was the same people who convinced Colin Powell into lying about weapons of mass distruction?

He did that because he's a RINO and wanted to destroy Bush. Everyone knows that.

[cjh]

Originally Posted by Squibbs

Distrustion or destruction?

Motherfucker if I'm not doddering in my old age.

I meant to write "weapons of mass benighted."

[zipman]

Originally Posted by vetteman

Petraeus testified this morning it was "IMMEDIATELY" apparent to him who was behind the attacks, and passed that info along. Who edited his comments and told Rice to lie to the American people?

But he also had 20 intelligence reports that blamed it on the movie. He had to vet (pardon the pun) that information before determining what the truth was.

What part of that being his job do you not understand because I can speak slower if you need me to.

[Squibbs]

Originally Posted by cjh

Motherfucker if I'm not doddering in my old age.

I meant to write "weapons of mass benighted."

I was hoping it was distrustion.

It seems like it should be a word.

And now it is.

[cjh]

Originally Posted by SeanH

He did that because he's a RINO and wanted to destroy Bush. Everyone knows that.

I wonder how much he regrets being played like that.

[hogjack]

Originally Posted by vetteman

Petraeus testified this morning that his assessment was altered.

Indeed, true.

[Squibbs]

Originally Posted by zipman

But he also had 20 intelligence reports that blamed it on the movie. He had to vet (pardon the pun) that information before determining what the truth was.

What part of that being his job do you not understand because I can speak slower if you need me to.

Why?

It doesn't matter what's said.

The derpeth doth overfloweth.

So sayeth the sheppard...

[RobDownSouth]

Originally Posted by Vettebigot

Bullshit! The Democrat position as stated today is that because she is black and a female, she is above criticism. Further, if you are black and female, you can act irresponsibly in government, you can engage in activity that would cost a white male his job with impunity. In her case professional integrity, oath of office, public trust, represent no obstacles whatsoever to her behavior. We understand where you're coming from.

The question remains, who told her to lie to the American people? Who?

I know you're increasingly desperate for a controversy, but this dog just won't hunt.

Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo.. said Petraeus told them the final document was put in front of all the senior agency leaders, including him, and everyone signed off on it.

LINK

Better luck next smear!

[IrezumiKiss]

Originally Posted by vetteman

Bullshit! The Democrat position as stated today is that because she is black and a female, she is above criticism. Further, if you are black and female, you can act irresponsibly in government, you can engage in activity that would cost a white male his job with impunity.

The above is a big, steaming, porcelain bowl of old white male pussy crybaby bullshit.

So cry it out for me, bitch.

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Originally Posted by vetteman

Petraeus testified this morning it was "IMMEDIATELY" apparent to him who was behind the attacks, and passed that info along. Who edited his comments and told Rice to lie to the American people?

Republican Peter King admitted today on CNN that David Petraeus, in his Hill briefing, the one John McCain couldn't be bothered to attend because he was holding a press conference denouncing the administration for withholding information, gave Susan Rice the green light to say what she said on those TV appearances on that fateful day.

So the answer to your question, according to Rep. Peter King (R) who was AT the Hill briefing, is that David Petraeus approved her statement.

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Originally Posted by RobDownSouth

I know you're increasingly desperate for a controversy, but this dog just won't hunt.

Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo.. said Petraeus told them the final document was put in front of all the senior agency leaders, including him, and everyone signed off on it.

LINK

Better luck next smear!

Quoted because some cowards would rather ignore a poster than hear truth.

[Worm]

These are the only things we need to know. I could care less about the controversy over the video vs terrorism.

1. Were repeated requests made for more security in Libya?
If so who ultimately rejected those requests? They should be fired.

2. Who made the decision not to staff security with American military? They should be fired.

3. During the event did we have assets that could have intervened but someone rejected that idea/request? If so they should be fired.

Seriously a grocery store manager would have been able to get to the bottom of this quicker.

[phrodeau]

Absolutely, the US military needs to maintain an aggressive posture within every country we hope to keep peaceful relations with. That only makes sense.

[vetteman]

Originally Posted by Ulaven_Demorte

Republican Peter King admitted today on CNN that David Petraeus, in his Hill briefing, the one John McCain couldn't be bothered to attend because he was holding a press conference denouncing the administration for withholding information, gave Susan Rice the green light to say what she said on those TV appearances on that fateful day.

So the answer to your question, according to Rep. Peter King (R) who was AT the Hill briefing, is that David Petraeus approved her statement.

Hey butthead does Susan Rice, a Cabinet member, take her orders from the Director of the CIA or the fucking President? Ya big dummy.

Even the President said she did what she did on instructions from the White House. Ya stooge.

[JohnnySavage]

So if I am to understand the thread... Vett-the-Traitor is upset that classified information wasn't shared with the public.

Is that really his position?

I would have expected no less from the likes of him.

[Sean]

Originally Posted by JohnnySavage

So if I am to understand the thread... Vett-the-Traitor is upset that classified information wasn't shared with the public.

Is that really his position?

I would have expected no less from the likes of him.

Vettetraitor only feels that the constitution should be adhered to when his guys benefit.

[phrodeau]

Originally Posted by JohnnySavage

So if I am to understand the thread... Vett-the-Traitor is upset that classified information wasn't shared with the public.

Is that really his position?

I would have expected no less from the likes of him.

He's been lied to so often by his preferred media that he assumes everything he hears is a lie.

[zipman]

Originally Posted by vetteman

Hey butthead does Susan Rice, a Cabinet member, take her orders from the Director of the CIA or the fucking President? Ya big dummy.

Even the President said she did what she did on instructions from the White House. Ya stooge.

So your position is that Obama told her to lie, is that it?

[vetteman]

Originally Posted by Wrong Element

Being black, female, saying things that later proved inaccurate, and having the name of Rice has never been a barrier to being Secretary of State before--why start now?

Originally Posted by cjh

I wonder if it was the same people who convinced Colin Powell into lying about weapons of mass distruction?

Originally Posted by Squibbs

Distrustion or destruction?

Originally Posted by SeanH

He did that because he's a RINO and wanted to destroy Bush. Everyone knows that.

Originally Posted by zipman

But he also had 20 intelligence reports that blamed it on the movie. He had to vet (pardon the pun) that information before determining what the truth was.

What part of that being his job do you not understand because I can speak slower if you need me to.

Originally Posted by Squibbs

I was hoping it was distrustion.

It seems like it should be a word.

And now it is.

Originally Posted by cjh

I wonder how much he regrets being played like that.

Originally Posted by Squibbs

Why?

It doesn't matter what's said.

The derpeth doth overfloweth.

So sayeth the sheppard...

Originally Posted by RobDownSouth

I know you're increasingly desperate for a controversy, but this dog just won't hunt.

Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo.. said Petraeus told them the final document was put in front of all the senior agency leaders, including him, and everyone signed off on it.

LINK

Better luck next smear!

Originally Posted by IrezumiKiss

The above is a big, steaming, porcelain bowl of old white male pussy crybaby bullshit.

So cry it out for me, bitch.

Originally Posted by Ulaven_Demorte

Republican Peter King admitted today on CNN that David Petraeus, in his Hill briefing, the one John McCain couldn't be bothered to attend because he was holding a press conference denouncing the administration for withholding information, gave Susan Rice the green light to say what she said on those TV appearances on that fateful day.

So the answer to your question, according to Rep. Peter King (R) who was AT the Hill briefing, is that David Petraeus approved her statement.

All of the above are failed efforts of intellectual contortionists who will say anything to justify the unjustifiable actions of people violating the public trust.

[vetteman]

Originally Posted by zipman

So your position is that Obama told her to lie, is that it?

Does she work for Obama or does she work for the CIA? Did the President not say she did what she did on instructions from the White House? Would he have challenged two United States senators to come after him if he wan't admitting responsibility?

[zipman]

Originally Posted by vetteman

All of the above are failed efforts of intellectual contortionists who will say anything to justify the unjustifiable actions of people violating the public trust.

You mean like this:

Originally Posted by zipman

I'm content to wait and see what the investigation shows. Personally, I'm not thrilled with her and think she should probably resign over the whole thing. But I'm not about to jump the gun on anything either.

Funny that you chose not to include this quote. Perhaps funny isn't the right word, I think disingenuous is much better.

[zipman]

Originally Posted by vetteman

Does she work for Obama or does she work for the CIA? Did the President not say she did what she did on instructions from the White House? Would he have challenged two United States senators to come after him if he wan't admitting responsibility?

Stop deflecting and answer the question. Are you stating that you believe he told her to lie. It's a yes or no question.

[phrodeau]

Originally Posted by vetteman

Does she work for Obama or does she work for the CIA? Did the President not say she did what she did on instructions from the White House? Would he have challenged two United States senators to come after him if he wan't admitting responsibility?

The CIA works for the White House.

Do you have any real evidence that anyone in the Obama admin lied about Benghazi?