Remember When Everyone Was Worried About Using “provocative” Language About Political

REMEMBER WHEN EVERYONE WAS WORRIED ABOUT USING “PROVOCATIVE” LANGUAGE ABOUT POLITICAL FIGURES?

Me neither. Time Magazine Headline: ‘Wisconsin’s Governor Wins But Is He Still Dead Man Walker?’

Take your civility BULLSHIT and shove it up your ass!

New Civility," RIP


One would think that if anything is uncivil it is a death threat. Local news outlets in Wisconsin report that a number of Republican legislators have received such threats. Democratic Party activists have gone to Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald's house and pounded on his windows, demanding that he come out, at 6:00 in the morning. Crazed mobs have repeatedly menaced Republicans, who had to be spirited out of the state Capitol by armed state patrolmen. If this isn't uncivil, what is?

Apparently that isn't how the national media see it. Noel Sheppard notes that ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, NPR, the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, and the Los Angeles Times have all ignored these multiple death threats against Republican politicians, even though they have been deemed credible by local law enforcement.

Of course, these are all Democratic Party news outlets. It is no surprise to anyone that their calls for a "new civility" were nothing but an attempt to shut up conservatives. They are perfectly content with mob rule, as long as the mob is a mob of Democrats. "New civility," RIP. We won't miss you.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

None of the "Obama is imposing his will on the American people" crowd seemed very upset about the procedural loophole Walker et al exploited to pass his law.

Interesting, no?

are loopholes illegal?

would they have been needed to be used had the DUMZ not abrogated tehir sworn duty by running?

did you say the same thing regards DEEM and PASS?

FUCK YOU LIB and HOPE YOU GET DECAPITATED by the MOOSEFUCKS you love...........CIVILITY!

HIPPO CREEP!

Is the actual democratic (small-d) congressional process illegal? The R's didn't run, they were right there....

non responsive to the OP!

as usual, when an obvious point is made, you TERRORISTS divert!

WTF HAPPENED TO YOUR SHRIEKS FO CIVILITY?????????????????

busybody said:

non responsive to the OP!

as usual, when an obvious point is made, you TERRORISTS divert!

WTF HAPPENED TO YOUR SHRIEKS FO CIVILITY?????????????????

Click to expand...

It's Time Magazine, doofus. Find the Democratic candidate for governor who says the same thing, and then we'll talk.

Typical...........

Sorta akin to

Its ONLY ONE CRAZED MOOSEFUCK!


You "people" never ever take responsibilty!


BTW, Your NIGGA! said NOTHING, your Labor Sec calls it an ATTACK on LABOR Your Lying Scum SpokesDICK for teh NIGGA!House calls it VILLIFICATION


No! ITS YOU and YOURS

You can run, You can hide

AMERICA SEES YOU!

You all are scum!

Dude...

You pieces of SHIT always have an excuse

You pieces of shit cant ever say

ENOUGH.............NOT IN MY NAME......STOP.............WE ARE BETTER THAN THIS!


You arent...YOU ARE PIECES OF SHIT!

Sonny Limatina said:

Dude...

Click to expand...

stop with the DUDE shit

when YOU pile on with your "people" on bogus BULL SHIT at least be man enough to say.........

Yes, Im a HIPPO CREEP, and fuck off BB............I do what teh fuck I want and SCREW YOU!

Sonny Limatina said:

Dude...

Click to expand...

McGuffin!

Sonny Limatina said:

It's Time Magazine, doofus. Find the Democratic candidate for governor who says the same thing, and then we'll talk.

Click to expand...

this says MORE than yoru McGuffin thread!

busybody said:

Sonny pwned me.

Click to expand...

Agreed.

What next?

You gonna FLEE LIT and scream..........SONNY PWNED ME???????????????

busybody said:

What next?

You gonna FLEE LIT and scream..........SONNY PWNED ME???????????????

Click to expand...

What's wrong with the hysterical left is that they keep saying the same things over and over, no matter what the actual issue is.

What's wrong with the hysterical right is that they're so hurt that anyone would ever say anything bad about them that they keep trying to say the same wrong things about the left, no matter how flimsy the foundation.

Welcome to the hysterical right, Turner Leaf.

Sonny

Until You and NIGGER Sharpton, NIGGER Jerkson, Tingles etc etc etc etc

Call for a boycott of SLIME RAGAZINE......as you did against FOX, Beck, Rl etc etc

After the alleged "shooting" of Gifford

Your words are meaningless

Sonny Limatina said:

What's wrong with the hysterical left is that they keep saying the same things over and over, no matter what the actual issue is.

What's wrong with the hysterical right is that they're so hurt that anyone would ever say anything bad about them that they keep trying to say the same wrong things about the left, no matter how flimsy the foundation.

Welcome to the hysterical right, Turner Leaf.

Click to expand...

We are NOT HURT

We are just pointing out the hippo creepsy of YOU and your ELK!

What WRONG things is teh right saying about teh LEFT without foundation

Tell me

I'll wait

Remember all that fuss two months ago about violent rhetoric and imagery following the tragic Tucson shootings that almost killed Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.)?
http://newsbusters.org/sites/default/files/thumbnail_photos/2011/March/Chalk.jpg
Apparently the folks at Time magazine have forgotten, for on Saturday, they actually published an article with the following headline:

Wisconsin's Governor Wins But Is He Still Dead Man Walker?
The first paragraph wasn't any more delicate:

The state capitol of Wisconsin had taken on an eerie quiet on Friday. Gone were the throngs of protesters who occupied its marble floors like a campground in summer. The midnight honking of cars circling the white building had ceased. The chalk "dead man" outlines etched with Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker's name on the sidewalks remained in dismembered parts, incompletely washed away by clean-up hoses.

You hadn't heard about these chalk outlines?

Well, that's not surprising. As NewsBusters reported Sunday, most media outlets don't think death threats or violent imagery are a bad thing when Republicans are the target.

Unless there's some other reference I'm missing, the folks at Time were making a pun with Walker's name and the 1995 film "Dead Man Walking."

The article pointed out that he may end up suffering a recall in January or at the polls in 2014. Hence, he could be a dead man walking.

But in a post-Tucson world, especially given the death threats that have been issued against some of Walker's colleagues, is this appropriate?

Just imagine the outrage if Walker was a Democrat, and a conservative magazine like National Review or the Weekly Standard did the same thing.

There'd be calls for immediate apologies from the author and the editor as well as some folks asking for both to be suspended or fired.

But when a liberal publication two months after Tucson makes such a reference to a Republican?

Crickets.



Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s...rnor-wins-he-still-dead-man-wal#ixzz1GZSsXv4G

ANOTHER PRECEDENT BEING ESTABLISHED: Pro-Union Protesters Now Videotaping License Plates at Scott Walker Fundraisers.

Tea Partiers should feel free to do the same now, I guess.

But RON! It's OUR provocative language now!





I KNOW! Let's talk fucking Sarah Palin!





BULLSEYE!!!

liberals control the language . it's usage . it's definitions .
that's just the way it is ~

We see thru it

We wont stand for it