Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shame on the 12 year old for not looking after her little sister.
Usually, it's an empty threat: "If you kids don't stop fighting, I'm going to stop this car right now and leave you here!" But a mother from an upper-crust New York suburb went through with it, ordering her battling 10- and 12-year-old daughters out of her car in White Plains' business district and driving off
Although the first sentence of the article might lead people to believe that she put the kids out of the car as punishment, it could well have been that she did it out of frustration just so she wouldn't have to hear them argue any more.
Would that make any difference in your assessment or her parenting skills or lack thereof?
she should have dropped them off into a vat of acid.
Even if the 10y/o threw a tantrum and refused to run up to the car, this is nothing compared to the 40something law firm partner tantrum that left her out on the street to begin with.if they were left to walk, how did the kid find her mom?
did she stop just at the end of the street?
did the 10y/o throw a tantrum and refuse to run up to the car, and that's why a 'good samaritan' approached her?
Wait. It's okay for the mother to abandon her daughters, but not for her daughters to abandon each other?Absolutely. That was one of my first thoughts on reading the article: why did the eldest child make it back to her Mom while the youngest didn't.
I have let my children walk a mile or so to a playground but with strict rules that they are to remain together and that the eldest is in charge.
Shame on the 12 year old for not looking out for her sister? Then a hundred fold shame on the mother for not looking out for her two underaged daughters.
Then please, by God, don't show your kids by your own actions that it is okay to abandon one another.I believe there may be some details of this tale that we're not getting and those details could prove important.
To my way of thinking, if the kids knew the neighborhood, knew their way home, were in a relatively safe locale (and even your front yard can prove unsafe but we can't keep kids locked in the house all day out of fear or they'll grow up weird and scared all the time) and had plenty of time to get home before dark then it wasn't a big deal to me that she dropped the kids off. It may not have been the best parenting in the world because it shows that she let them go too far in getting to her when the arguing should have been nipped in the bud miles before but it hardly justifies her losing the kids over it.
If they didn't know their way home, were on a "dangerous" street or had to cross a superhighway to get home and it was dark or rapidly approaching dark then that was a very bad choice on the Mom's part.
I expect the oldest child to look after the younger because that is an expectation I have of my children as I have plainly made clear about a thousand times. "You're the eldest, you're in charge." Of course, the younger child hears, "You're the boy, I expect you to take up for your sister if she needs help." as he did last year when he waded through jelly-fish infested waters to take her hand and lead her back to shore from a sandbar where she'd been playing before the tide changed.
Someday I'll be gone and my husband will be gone but my children will still hopefully have each other as siblings. The sibling relationship is usually the longest of our lifetime since parents die and spouses aren't met until adulthood. I want my children to be there for each other and have strived hard to make certain that they have a relationship independent of their relationship with the entire family.
In fact, I told my husband that we should leave them both out of the will and leave our money instead to a home for wayward cats or something as the surest mean to unite them after we're gone. After all, they would then have a common enemy.![]()
Then please, by God, don't show your kids by your own actions that it is okay to abandon one another.
I wish I could remember where I found the article, I may even have posted a copy here but I can't find it.
Anyway, it was about British children and how the acceptable roaming distance has decreased dramatically over four generations. The great-grandfather had a twenty mile radius, the grandfather fifteen miles, the Mother five miles and her child about 500 yards. (figures subject to my poor memory)
My grandmother thought nothing of dropping my mother off on the side of the highway for her to walk to their "camp" six miles away.
I wonder, are there that many more dangers lurking or do we have a greater perception of danger because of 24 hour news shows? My mother argues that children weren't abducted then but I suspect they were and only made the local news.
Then please, by God, don't show your kids by your own actions that it is okay to abandon one another.
Believe it or not, it matters little what you "teach them" with words and admonishment, compared to how you act.
If you tell your daughters that you want them to be there for each other when you're gone but you dump them on the street for disobeying you, they're going to listen more to your actions and guess what they're gonna do?
I'm not referring to the whole situation here, but simply this point.
I disagree that punishing your children by making them walk three miles home is abandonment. When it happened to me as a teenager, it never crossed my mind that I had been abandoned. It was a plain and simple punishment. I was close enough to walk home, but my mom returned and picked me up. Even the half-mile I walked was enough to know I had done something wrong. If my brother had been left with me, and he decided to walk a separate direction, that I would have seen as abandonment on his part.
How is an adult leaving children alone not abandonment if one of the children leaving the other child is abandonment?
I'm missing some logical nuance maybe.
Or maybe I'd think that arguing children wouldn't be likely to help each other and it's - bad judgment.
Sometimes the punishments were harsh. It never meant my parents loved me any less. Actually the fact that I was fed, sheltered, and occasionally punished showed their love for me.
I wasn't trying to personalize it, more just give an example. I figure in this situation we don't know all the details. I don't object to some kind of visit/inspection to insure this isn't a symptom of a big problem. I do think though that due to the lack of information you can't necessarily say she's a bad mother or that she doesn't deserve to have custody of her children.
the really bad mummy in me (as opposed to the one who chucked my kids out of the car to make them walk) not only laughed, but empathised![]()
Did the story mention her being a single Mom? If so, I missed that. I don't think that would make any difference. I'm married and can still get plenty upset with my kids for arguing with each other.