Dr D's Dastardly Den

Thanks, Coffee! I must confess, I am a bit puzzled by the pixie sex thing. Does the impossibility of 'normal' consummation add to the appeal? Is it just a 'cute little girl confronts enormous cock' thing? If someone would explain it to me I might make better pixie-porn.

It's magical!:D
To me, I imagine that the pixies or fairies can provide a vigorous action which belies their small stature. There is mythology around fairies that they are able to change form and even size...perhaps that also includes a degree of elasticity...?

You depicted on with a full body grip — arms and legs... perhaps with the buzzing wings causing vibrations...and rising up and down rapidly....?
 
It's magical!:D
To me, I imagine that the pixies or fairies can provide a vigorous action which belies their small stature. There is mythology around fairies that they are able to change form and even size...perhaps that also includes a degree of elasticity...?

You depicted on with a full body grip — arms and legs... perhaps with the buzzing wings causing vibrations...and rising up and down rapidly....?

Thank you. I can see the size-changing thing being a big help. Being a tiny, flesh vibrator makes some sense too. And who knows what erotic properties pixie dust may have? People have proven adept at finding a way to have sex with pretty much anything, but in this case it seems to me that a certain specific outlook would be needed to make it really enjoyable, and I'm trying to figure out what that is. For instance, I've known girls for whom a dildo = meh, but the pointy toe of a high-heeled shoe = mind bending orgasm.
*Side note: Literotica's text editor does not know the word 'dildo.' Irony much?
 
Thanks, Coffee! I must confess, I am a bit puzzled by the pixie sex thing. Does the impossibility of 'normal' consummation add to the appeal? Is it just a 'cute little girl confronts enormous cock' thing? If someone would explain it to me I might make better pixie-porn.

This maybe?

Never really thought about it before, but your pictures are sexy as fuck!
 
This maybe?

Never really thought about it before, but your pictures are sexy as fuck!

It's interesting, because both of these pixies would have to be quite a bit bigger to even able to choke on cock, so it seems like there's a kind of inverted 'safety feature' in these images. Small and delicate, but impenetrable. If they were bigger, they could be having a rough time.

Edited to add "Thanks! Sexy as fuck is a good thing!"
 
Just a quick thank you, for letting us see your work =) The pixies are quite cute - made me giggle.
I have to say - i love, love, love the first one you posted. The lines and the contrast with the red gag... quite a powerful combination.

I'll be looking forward to seeing more from you =)
 
Just a quick thank you, for letting us see your work =) The pixies are quite cute - made me giggle.
I have to say - i love, love, love the first one you posted. The lines and the contrast with the red gag... quite a powerful combination.

I'll be looking forward to seeing more from you =)

Thank you, Shadowheart. I am pretty early in the process of going digital. There are lots of nice things about it, and a lot of things that won't seem to behave the way I want them to. Eventually, I suppose, I will arrive at some kind of 'style'.
 
The search for a "personal style" is part of what makes art fun for me. Whether it's traditional media or digital.
The journey will hopefully give you results that you like enough to share, and then it's all gravy ;)
 
The search for a "personal style" is part of what makes art fun for me. Whether it's traditional media or digital.
The journey will hopefully give you results that you like enough to share, and then it's all gravy ;)

If I had to like it first, I'd never share anything. If I don't hate it, I share it. Sometimes if I do hate it I share it. Liking it is someone else's job.
 
The search for a "personal style" is part of what makes art fun for me. Whether it's traditional media or digital.
The journey will hopefully give you results that you like enough to share, and then it's all gravy ;)

BTW, your private messages are off. I wanted to discuss the whole 'it looks digital because it is digital' thing with you, but I don't want hijack that thread.
 
I like the pose. Gives an interesting dynamic to the image. Using the white for highlights and shine effects on the mask looks really good.
She doesn't necessarily look very comfortable in that pose, but it does look very hot ;) Very nice indeed.

Maybe add a line or two just to hint at the floor?
 
I like the pose. Gives an interesting dynamic to the image. Using the white for highlights and shine effects on the mask looks really good.
She doesn't necessarily look very comfortable in that pose, but it does look very hot ;) Very nice indeed.

Maybe add a line or two just to hint at the floor?

Well... she's not supposed to be comfortable.... Hot, though, is good. Thanks!
I kinda thought about the floor, hoped the pose and squashed breast would imply it. Maybe I need a shadow, or some interrupted white reflections... I'll mess with it...
 
I think it is better with floor suggestion too.:)

Depending on how you are imaging the trussing up...
my thought is to show just a bit of leather loop and steel ring...to suggest a butt hook.
Unless that is not what is happening.:cool:
 
I think it is better with floor suggestion too.:)

Depending on how you are imaging the trussing up...
my thought is to show just a bit of leather loop and steel ring...to suggest a butt hook.
Unless that is not what is happening.:cool:

Just a strap to the front of her waist-strap, tight enough to keep her from flattening out. A tail-hook would do the same, of course, with certain added benefits, depending on how you measure these things. This is perhaps a 200 level course, perhaps the prerequisite to the class with the hook... ;)
 
I'm gonna be different and say I liked it a lot more without the 'floor'. The floor was definitely implied, and unless the floor added something to the scene I think it sort of takes the focus away from the main subject...that's just my opinion.
 
I'm gonna be different and say I liked it a lot more without the 'floor'. The floor was definitely implied, and unless the floor added something to the scene I think it sort of takes the focus away from the main subject...that's just my opinion.

OMG! You are SO wrong! ;):D

on a related note...
Something that can be effective — material/technique contrast.

I am not familiar with the applications that you had mention, Dr. D, but in photoshop you can make vector paths, which you can in turn "stroke" with the tool/brush of your choice, and using that method make hard edged regular seems in a hardwood or tile floor. to contrast the curvilinear form of your subject. For example— first with a hard, narrow shadow, then a soft shadow broader, then an offset highlight. or whatever. you know the deal.

Or, when using a tablet, using a straight edge... just like traditional tools.

Not saying you should do this, but something to mess about with for your arsenal of tools/techniques and methods.
 
OMG! You are SO wrong! ;):D

on a related note...
Something that can be effective — material/technique contrast.

I am not familiar with the applications that you had mention, Dr. D, but in photoshop you can make vector paths, which you can in turn "stroke" with the tool/brush of your choice, and using that method make hard edged regular seems in a hardwood or tile floor. to contrast the curvilinear form of your subject. For example— first with a hard, narrow shadow, then a soft shadow broader, then an offset highlight. or whatever. you know the deal.

Or, when using a tablet, using a straight edge... just like traditional tools.

Not saying you should do this, but something to mess about with for your arsenal of tools/techniques and methods.

I considered saying more flooring detail like hardwood or tile might be better, but then I thought...that's still too much focus on the floor when I don't really think the floor was that important. I could be wrong about that too...:D
 
Nope, I looked at it again...I'm not wrong. EVERYONE else is wrong :D

SooooOooOOoOO wrong. ;):)


see, one can create a substrate which, although, detailed/accurate (or diffuse and suggestive) and is also subordinate to the subordinate.:cool:
 
SooooOooOOoOO wrong. ;):)


see, one can create a substrate which, although, detailed/accurate (or diffuse and suggestive) and is also subordinate to the subordinate.:cool:

Yes, but...but...

I 'prefer' the implied hard surface. Maybe I don't want her on the floor. Maybe I want her in the middle of a large oak table...with a beautiful chandelier overhead.

And don't suggest I draw my own damn picture cuz...well, it wouldn't look anywhere near as good. :)
 
Back
Top