Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
I encourage you to reference the law itself or at least use an objective, nonpartisan analyst resource.
Like what?
Tell us Ron Ick
We'll wait
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I encourage you to reference the law itself or at least use an objective, nonpartisan analyst resource.
So you're too stupid to learn what Obamacare is so you choose to be willfully misled by people who drum up hoaxes for political gain. The fact is lots of people know what's in the law, just not you. It's a lengthy document but it's indexed like a reference book. It typically takes me thirty seconds to look something up within the law which might as well be an eternity to you since you're not the kind of person who tries to find facts on his own.
I encourage you to reference the law itself or at least use an objective, nonpartisan analyst resource.
Like what?
Tell us Ron Ick
We'll wait
We already debunked this as right wing spin.
Insurance companies can no longer turn people down for preexisting conditions or boot them if they become sick and expensive to cover, a mandate Republicans said they wanted in their Pledge to America. That means it's much more risky for insurance companies to issue individual plans since there's no safety valve of separating from a customer who is expensive. But under Obamacare, people can go to their state's exchange when they need an individual plan and buy group insurance instead.
Obamacare has been law for a few years now, don't you think it's time you took a moment to learn what it is?
1. Insurance companies can't refuse to cover you, but they can raise the premium to the point it's economically prohibitive. I dropped my individual plan when the premium more than doubled in two years.
2. You can't enroll in the state/fed exchanges until October, for coverage starting in January. The prices have yet to be set, and there's no reason to think the exchange prices will be any more affordable than a high deductible individual plan.
Less
Ron
ICK
says
1. Insurance companies can't refuse to cover you, but they can raise the premium to the point it's economically prohibitive. I dropped my individual plan when the premium more than doubled in two years.
2. You can't enroll in the state/fed exchanges until October, for coverage starting in January. The prices have yet to be set, and there's no reason to think the exchange prices will be any more affordable than a high deductible individual plan.
Remember they spent 20 million on p.r for Obama care
Health and human services was put in charge of it even they said they don't understand some of it and that congress needs to fix it.
The fact is lots of people know what's in the law, just not you. It's a lengthy document but it's indexed like a reference book. It typically takes me thirty seconds to look something up within the law which might as well be an eternity to you since you're not the kind of person who tries to find facts on his own.
Just like all major legislation, the ACA is complex and imperfect and will need to be refined over time. Why apply it to a different standard than other laws?
Which is it
I encourage you to reference the law itself or at least use an objective, nonpartisan analyst resource.
Like what?
Tell us Ron Ick
We'll wait
AARP shills for ObamaCare
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/...ouse-obamacare-article-1.200581#ixzz0vhQyAOkX
try again
I'LL WAIT
Your opinion piece is saying that the AARP is an anti-medicare lobbying group that exists to give seniors worse health care. And it pretends that the annual doctor fix which has happened every single year since Newt's speakership (and just got penciled in for 2013) will not happen and therefore Obamacare will scare off Medicare doctors.
Is this what you believe or are you just pulling a Vette/AJ weasel tactic and "reporting the report"?
Your opinion piece is saying that the AARP is an anti-medicare lobbying group that exists to give seniors worse health care. And it pretends that the annual doctor fix which has happened every single year since Newt's speakership (and just got penciled in for 2013) will not happen and therefore Obamacare will scare off Medicare doctors.
Is this what you believe or are you just pulling a Vette/AJ weasel tactic and "reporting the report"?
you misrepresented what the piece said
you did so KNOWINGLY
show me a credible source on ObamaCare
the piece says NOTHING of the sort
only touches it as a BY THE WAY
stop with the BS non PART SAN shit!
show me a credible source on ObamaCare
why should I?