Conager
¿Que? Cornelius!
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2014
- Posts
- 18,282
Voting no on a nominee is not "Absolute" obstruction.
“The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president,” an hour after a member of the supreme court dies then refusing to even allow a vote is "absolute" obstruction.
Now tell us about all the legal scholars who said Garland wasn't qualified.
None. Democrats did not have the votes to get him confirmed. As Obama says, "elections have consequences, John."
And he wss right the electorate decided they did NOT want Democrats choosing Scalia's replacement.