PayDay
unlabelable
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2011
- Posts
- 6,872
Absentee Totals?
http://www.longdistancevoter.org/absentee_voting_rules
Absentee ballots make up a large portion of voting, military/abroad/other.
Did they all count? Well I found this:Seems fun, disproves the whole theory:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/satire/absentee.asp
Right? Solves the whole 88?
&then I found this:
Election experts say the challenges created by mailed ballots could well affect outcomes this fall and beyond. If the contests next month are close enough to be within what election lawyers call the margin of litigation, the grounds on which they will be fought will not be hanging chads but ballots cast away from the voting booth.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/u...uld-impact-elections.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
This re-ops the 88?: The Military dies for US & deserves better:
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2012/08/08/campaigns-spar-over-military-absentee-ballots.html
So I figured "Why stop there?" & Looked more.
It took the Federal Government 7 days to count the 'official' results.
Wut? Huh? When did it become THAT efficient?
http://www.statista.com/topics/893/2012-election/
But why stop there? Considering reports that Absentee ballots are rejected for tons of reasons, you'd think at least, say, 5 million were rejected?
Well that's the total difference in popular vote, but broken into district, and across swing States, is that enough to modify Electoral College Totals?
http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php
But how the election results be official the next day if some states did not have their 'official' data collected until:
DECEMBER: C FO YO SELF:
http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/sources.php?year=2012&type=vot&f=0&off=0&elect=0
Here's the coincidentally coincidental: Newtown 'happened' on December 12th, 2012:::
Right about the same day that the officially official State totals were calculated.
Circumstantial? Yeah, OK... & then what happened?
http://www.longdistancevoter.org/absentee_voting_rules
Absentee ballots make up a large portion of voting, military/abroad/other.
Did they all count? Well I found this:Seems fun, disproves the whole theory:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/satire/absentee.asp
Right? Solves the whole 88?
&then I found this:
Election experts say the challenges created by mailed ballots could well affect outcomes this fall and beyond. If the contests next month are close enough to be within what election lawyers call the margin of litigation, the grounds on which they will be fought will not be hanging chads but ballots cast away from the voting booth.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/u...uld-impact-elections.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
This re-ops the 88?: The Military dies for US & deserves better:
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2012/08/08/campaigns-spar-over-military-absentee-ballots.html
So I figured "Why stop there?" & Looked more.
It took the Federal Government 7 days to count the 'official' results.
Wut? Huh? When did it become THAT efficient?
http://www.statista.com/topics/893/2012-election/
But why stop there? Considering reports that Absentee ballots are rejected for tons of reasons, you'd think at least, say, 5 million were rejected?
Well that's the total difference in popular vote, but broken into district, and across swing States, is that enough to modify Electoral College Totals?
http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php
But how the election results be official the next day if some states did not have their 'official' data collected until:
DECEMBER: C FO YO SELF:
http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/sources.php?year=2012&type=vot&f=0&off=0&elect=0
Here's the coincidentally coincidental: Newtown 'happened' on December 12th, 2012:::
Right about the same day that the officially official State totals were calculated.
Circumstantial? Yeah, OK... & then what happened?
Last edited: