Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why should she ruin her life? She's smarter than that. I hope.If nothing else takes him out before then, I think it'd be friggin' hilarious if Michelle ran in '20 and totally annihilated him in the vote.
In the same New Yorker article that detailed Sad Rex’s fall from King of Exxon to The White House Apprentice most likely to be You’re Fired next week, Dexter Filkins included this anecdote.
In February, a few weeks after Tillerson was confirmed by the Senate, he visited the Oval Office to introduce the President to a potential deputy, but Trump had something else on his mind. He began fulminating about federal laws that prohibit American businesses from bribing officials overseas; the businesses, he said, were being unfairly penalized.
O RLY???
Sure, it’s not exactly news that Donald Trump cries sad tears for the poor American businessmen who get their allowances docked for greasing foreign palms. He’s been complaining about the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) since 2012, at least.
So, the moral of the story is simple. Forget about the tennis ball that smells like pee. Follow the one that smells like money! Because that’s what Bob Mueller is doing. And from the way That Lunatic is carrying on this morning, it seems like the Special Counsel is on the right track.
MENSA has offered competitive tests.Maybe Mueller should require an IQ test from Trump.
MENSA has offered competitive tests.
But what if Tromp flunks? Bigly?
Await the tweetstorms. Oy.
The former District Attorney of Philadelphia told MSNBC chief legal correspondent Ari Melber that former White House chief of staff Reince Priebus is unlikely to protect President Donald Trump from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.
Late Friday afternoon, Priebus’ defense lawyer Bill Burck released a statement that, “Mr. Priebus was voluntarily interviewed by Special Counsel Mueller’s team today.”
“I think Reince Priebus will answer the questions truthfully,” former DA and Governor Ed Rendell explained to Melber as news broke of today’s testimony. “I think he’s not going to risk hurting himself or later being prosecuted for perjury.”
“I think he will paint a picture of potential obstruction, there’s no question about it,” Rendell predicted.
“Reince Priebus is not going to lie for Donald Trump, I don’t believe it for a second,” Rendell explained.
Good help is SO hard to find these days. The servant problem is just ex-CROO-shi-ating! It used to be, minions knew their place and didn't bother their masters. But now? Sad.Mueller interrogated Reince Priebus: ‘He will paint a picture of obstruction of justice’ ex-DA explains
Oh Donald, you're so fucked. Mahahahaha!
Whatever. The important point is that the results shouldn't go through Trump's hands before hitting the public or in any way controlled by him. He's totally dishonest.
Four major Russia investigations are underway in Washington, along with at least six related federal inquiries.
Anxiety currently swirls around the Kremlin’s manipulation of popular social media platforms Facebook, YouTube and Instagram. Cybersecurity sleuths claim Russia used Pokemon Go to inflame racial tensions and accuse Twitter of deleting crucial data detailing Russian efforts to sow discord during the 2016 presidential election.
“Russia, Russia Everywhere,” read The New York Times Oct. 13 “Week in Technology” review.
But as a cultural historian, I’m interested in how Russia’s media outlets – many of which are state-controlled – are covering these same stories.
It’s no secret that for years the Kremlin has claimed Washington possesses a knee-jerk, anti-Russian bias. Moscow officials have cast recent U.S. charges that Russia has been acting to “undermine the U.S.-led liberal democratic order” as simply part of this same phenomenon, albeit one that has blossomed, of late, into full-fledged hysteria.
Russia’s most popular media outlets compare the investigations to those of the McCarthy era, calling them “witch hunts” focused on a “phantom menace.”
However, I’ve noticed something surprising. Amid all the emphasis of “Russophobia run wild,” Russian media coverage seems to have become more positive in regard to one issue: the Justice Department’s investigation led by Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller.
A new Congressional probe of the 2010 sale of U.S. uranium to Russia led by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is examining if the FBI alerted senior Barack Obama administration officials about corruption among the transaction’s Russian players.
Before the deal was brokered in 2009, the FBI under Robert Mueller—who is now special counsel in the Russia investigation into potential collusion with the Trump campaign—had begun an investigation into corruption and extortion by senior managers of a company owned by the Russian-government’s nuclear company, Rosatom. According to court filings revealed by The Hill Tuesday, in 2009 the FBI found enough evidence to suggest Vadim Mikerin, who headed the Rosatom subsidiary Tenex, was corrupt and high-level officials at Rosatom knew about his bribery scheme. In 2014, he pled guilty in a U.S. court case to orchestrating more than $2 million in bribe payments through shadowy accounts in Cyprus, Latvia, and Switzerland.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley announced his committee's probe of the deal during a hearing with Attorney General Jeff Sessions Wednesday.
This isn't Mueller's investigation; it's Grassley's congressional investigation devised to deflect from the Mueller investigation. Where do you see that Mueller has folded it into his current investigation?
On Oct. 4, 2017, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) said that all issues relating to the investigation into Russian interference with the election remain open. But with respect to the firing of FBI Director James Comey, the committee had gone as far as it could and was passing the baton: “Future questions surrounding Comey’s firing are better answered by the [special] counsel or by the Justice Department,” Burr said.
Special counsel Robert Mueller is reportedly investigating whether Trump’s interactions with Comey amount to obstruction of justice. The charge can be leveled at anyone, including the president, who attempts to influence, obstruct or impede a federal investigation or a judicial process.
Most people assume that Comey’s firing is the linchpin of any obstruction of justice case against Donald Trump. And while it’s certainly important, it’s just one brick in a longer road. The BillMoyers.com Trump-Russia Timeline reveals that Trump’s Comey predicament is far worse than wherever the act of firing him takes Mueller. Long before he dismissed the FBI director — and for months thereafter — Trump took numerous actions that could now support an obstruction of justice charge.
If Silver Mike wasn't such a Pussy Boy he would have already 25th'd Trump.