These women are full of crap.

I thought, in America, it was innocent until proven guilty, but that is no longer the case anymore with this sexual misconduct hysteria. Why are people automatically believing these women and destroying these men’s careers? Maybe, on the rare occasion, one of these women could be telling the truth – but most of these women seem hungry for fame and/or money.

Now, Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose and countless other men are losing their jobs because of these conniving women. Also, especially with someone like Charlie Rose, something that could’ve been accepted decades ago is not accepted today, such as a smack on the butt. If you were smacked on the butt by Matt Lauer twenty years ago, get over it. That’s not sexual misconduct.

As if our country wasn’t divisive enough, it’s now getting to be a thicker line between men and women because these women love to play the victim role – and everyone is rallying to their side. And it’s disgusting. If all these claims were true, why didn’t they say something when they first happened instead of waiting till now? I don’t believe any of it.

Hi everyone,

I’m a single young lady (age 22) who is looking for men to chat with either by phone or by Yahoo voice chat (so long as I can hear your voice, hehe). I’d prefer this man to be anywhere from 30-70 years old. I love dirty talk, and if the man is quite a bit older, I would prefer to call him either “Daddy” or “Grandpa” - strange, I know, but to each his own! I also am interested in young men, too, as they have their own appeal which I have yet to fully experience.

I live in the U.S., but am open to talking to men in any corner of the world. Martial status, also, doesn’t matter to me all that much. I’d prefer the man to be single, but I must admit there’s something sexy and taboo about being naughty with a married man.

Another thing is is that, before heading off to the phone, I would prefer to get to know the man/men a little bit by e-mails and/or chat, just so I can get a feel for what kind man you are.

So, with that said, if this ad interests you, I’d prefer it very much if you could contact me through a private message because I rarely come to this forum.

Thanks for reading my message, and I hope to hear from some of you boys!
^^^ This explains everything...
 
The alleged perpetrator is, of course, innocent until proven guilty. Especially if a man.

The accuser is, of course, guilty of lying until proven innocent. Especially if a woman.

:rolleyes:


What utter dark ages thinking.

In a perfect society, both parties would be given a chance to present their side in a case, and the evidence examined without pride or prejudice. But when accusations are made in the form of press releases, that whole idea really does go out the window, because it automatically introduces some kind of prejudice in most people, i.e. the first thing they heard about it tends to stick in their minds. Freedom of the Press has it's downside.

I can't speak for anyone else, but I wouldn't discount an accuser right off the bat unless I had a very compelling reason to do so, nor would I assume the guilt of the accused automatically...unless I had a very good reason to do so.
Unfortunately, I'm probably in the minority.
 
In a perfect society, both parties would be given a chance to present their side in a case, and the evidence examined without pride or prejudice. But when accusations are made in the form of press releases, that whole idea really does go out the window, because it automatically introduces some kind of prejudice in most people, i.e. the first thing they heard about it tends to stick in their minds. Freedom of the Press has it's downside.

Good old "trial by media". If you want to know how bad those can get, look up Lindsay Chamberlain.
 
I believe them, most of them, but I don't believe they are truly brave. If they were they wouldn't have allowed to this to go on in the first place.

You believe women as sexually assaulted or harassed because of a lack of bravery?
 
You believe women as sexually assaulted or harassed because of a lack of bravery?

You may not know but when confronted by a bully, and these offenders are bullies in my mind, you must fight back immediately or suffer further attacks in the future based on your weakness in defending yourself. This is a well-known fact, known especially to men.

The very best defense is to expose the offender immediately, even if doing so has initial economic consequences. Women have to reach deep down inside and get mean just like anyone else being confronted by a bully.
 
And are not as. :eek:

He agreed that when pre-teen/teen whores get pregnant they should be sent to "get well" for 9 months and only return to polite society when the demon seed is expelled.
 
Nothing like a thread filled with alts accusing other people of lack of bravery.

Ironic isn't it.

In a perfect society, both parties would be given a chance to present their side in a case, and the evidence examined without pride or prejudice. But when accusations are made in the form of press releases, that whole idea really does go out the window, because it automatically introduces some kind of prejudice in most people, i.e. the first thing they heard about it tends to stick in their minds. Freedom of the Press has it's downside.

I can't speak for anyone else, but I wouldn't discount an accuser right off the bat unless I had a very compelling reason to do so, nor would I assume the guilt of the accused automatically...unless I had a very good reason to do so.
Unfortunately, I'm probably in the minority.

Oddly enough this logic seems most applied to allegations of rape and sexual assault.

Do you think this way about robbery and murder?
 
Last edited:
I thought, in America, it was innocent until proven guilty, but that is no longer the case anymore with this sexual misconduct hysteria. Why are people automatically believing these women and destroying these men’s careers? Maybe, on the rare occasion, one of these women could be telling the truth – but most of these women seem hungry for fame and/or money.

Now, Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose and countless other men are losing their jobs because of these conniving women. Also, especially with someone like Charlie Rose, something that could’ve been accepted decades ago is not accepted today, such as a smack on the butt. If you were smacked on the butt by Matt Lauer twenty years ago, get over it. That’s not sexual misconduct.

As if our country wasn’t divisive enough, it’s now getting to be a thicker line between men and women because these women love to play the victim role – and everyone is rallying to their side. And it’s disgusting. If all these claims were true, why didn’t they say something when they first happened instead of waiting till now? I don’t believe any of it.

I totally agree, why wait 10, 20 even 30 years to make a complaint, and ruin a few innocent men?
 
Wow, so much sympathy for the meek and abused. Give yourselves a round of applause.

:D

Can "the meek and the abused" be that one day, then claim to be strong and powerful the next? Is it a light switch kind of thing? A transcharacter deal? Psychotic mental illness? How does that work, exactly? Or, is it just the magic unicorn fart-fueled power of progressive wannabism, practiced so expertly by its more feminine side (regardless of sex)?

Speaking of which...

Hey, Sybil...I mean, neci: you okay this morning? Taken all your meds? No more psychoticly violent (and against Forum Guidelines) outbursts/threats today, being a wannabe badass by telling a male exactly how viciously you'd assault his penis and anus...

...if only you had the actual "power" to do so?

roflmao.gif


How's it feel to be cozily ensconced within the totally partisan progressive confines of GB "Free Speech" safety, meaning, because you've pathetically piled-up a mountain of progressive kitty mama kiss ass points over the years, you're free to violently threaten another poster with outright, vicious physical assault - and not even a word of any warning at all is posted, while others, ALL non-progressives, are "Free Speech" banned for physically threatening no one at all?

Take the day off, Sybil, and cherish the affirmative partisan action of your progressively special snowflakedom - you definitely deserve it.
 
Ironic isn't it.



Oddly enough this logic seems most applied to allegations of rape and sexual assault.

Do you think this way about robbery and murder?

Taking into account the many cases of erroneous convictions, convicts that are later exonerated due to compelling evidence to their innocence, malfeasance on the part of overzealous prosecutors, occasional corruption within the law enforcement and legal systems.....yeah, I try very hard to give everyone a fair shake. I wouldn't want to be falsely accused, and I sure as hell wouldn't want people to automatically assume I was guilty of something I know I didn't do.

Do I always succeed? No. I admit there have been times when I've been biased towards the accused, or the accuser. But, I try very hard to catch myself when I realize I'm doing it.
 
Taking into account the many cases of erroneous convictions, convicts that are later exonerated due to compelling evidence to their innocence, malfeasance on the part of overzealous prosecutors, occasional corruption within the law enforcement and legal systems.....yeah, I try very hard to give everyone a fair shake. I wouldn't want to be falsely accused, and I sure as hell wouldn't want people to automatically assume I was guilty of something I know I didn't do.

Do I always succeed? No. I admit there have been times when I've been biased towards the accused, or the accuser. But, I try very hard to catch myself when I realize I'm doing it.

You are in the overwhelming vast minority if what you claim you do is true.

Just as a sampling:

Out of 1000 rape accusations, 310 are reported, 57 arrested, 12 prosecuted and 7 convicted, 6 will be incarcerated.

Out of 1000 robbery accusations, 619 reported, 167 arrested, 37 prosecuted, 22 convicted, 20 incarcerated.

Out of 1000 assault and battery, 627 reported, 285 arrested, 105 prosecuted, 41 convicted, 33 incarcerated.

A man has a greater chance of being raped than of being falsely accused of rape.

We have a statistical problem when dealing with rape and sexual assault that are based in and around our attitudes when dealing with sex based crimes. Attitudes like the OP are largely why. They believe women have a credibility problem. In reality, society has a problem accepting the credibility of women. Considering that every woman I know and have ever talked to has experienced some form of sexual assault or harassment, I think we need to think long and hard about automatically discrediting women when they come forth.
 
You are in the overwhelming vast minority if what you claim you do is true.

Just as a sampling:

Out of 1000 rape accusations, 310 are reported, 57 arrested, 12 prosecuted and 7 convicted, 6 will be incarcerated.

Out of 1000 robbery accusations, 619 reported, 167 arrested, 37 prosecuted, 22 convicted, 20 incarcerated.

Out of 1000 assault and battery, 627 reported, 285 arrested, 105 prosecuted, 41 convicted, 33 incarcerated.

A man has a greater chance of being raped than of being falsely accused of rape.

We have a statistical problem when dealing with rape and sexual assault that are based in and around our attitudes when dealing with sex based crimes. Attitudes like the OP are largely why. They believe women have a credibility problem. In reality, society has a problem accepting the credibility of women. Considering that every woman I know and have ever talked to has experienced some form of sexual assault or harassment, I think we need to think long and hard about automatically discrediting women when they come forth.

Every woman? You're full of shit.
 
Women Lie.

women 'forget' partners, add years to the age at which they lost their virginity and refuse to tell the truth about masturbation or using pornography.

'Women are so sensitive about being labelled sluts or whores that they are very reluctant to be honest about their sexual behaviour, even in supposedly anonymous surveys,' said Terri Fisher, who led the research at Ohio State University.

Researchers quizzed 96 male and 105 female students aged 18 to 25 about their sex lives under three different conditions.

First, they were told their answers would be anonymous, then that a researcher was watching and lastly they believed they were wired to a lie detector machine.

The study found women in the three groups responded very differently but the men's answers hardly varied.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-188365/Women-lie-sexual-past.html
 
Every woman? You're full of shit.
No, she's incorrect there. What she meant to say was "Considering that every woman I know and have ever talked to has experienced some form of sexual assault or harassment at least once"
I'm glad you picked up on that

Oh Eeyore, look: time for another dick comment. Happy days :)
 
No, she's incorrect there. What she meant to say was "Considering that every woman I know and have ever talked to has experienced some form of sexual assault or harassment at least once"
I'm glad you picked up on that

Oh Eeyore, look: time for another dick comment. Happy days :)

Can anyone recommend a way of removing the stains left by sperm on clothing? My old BF managed to ruin a couple of my T-shirts... and before you ask I do swallow.

Happy days, indeed!
 
Back
Top