DeadManTyping
Really Really Experienced
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2016
- Posts
- 401
An Exercise in Alternative History
1782: The British Victory over the American Rebels
PLEASE NOTE:
1782: The British Victory over the American Rebels
PLEASE NOTE:
This is an idea first put forth by BellaMiles.
She has decided to participate but not manage this thread,
and while I have chosen a different historical event
on which to base the thread,
the credit still goes to her.
Post#1
Background: September, 1777, a British marksman has a Continental Army Officer in his sights and can easily put a round through the man's back. He doesn't take the shot, though, because it would have been at the man's back.
Because of this, the potential target that day, General George Washington, lives to lead the American Rebels to victory, later becoming the first President of a new and historically influential country.
But what if Ferguson had taken the shot that day and killed Washington? Could the British have gone on to defeat the retched rebels?
What if we just choose to answer that question with a resounding yes!
How to play:
- We begin with me killing George -- I mean, Ferguson killing Washington -- and England going on to put down the rebellion.
- You follow up with a post that builds upon mine.
- Lather, rinse, repeat. (This was BellaMiles's phrase, but I love it.)
Rules and Guidelines:
- Replies must be less than 100 words!
- No consecutive replies in a string of events.
- You may reply to any post, not just the most recent one.
- One event per post. No changing the entire world history in one post.
How to write your post: (pretty much the same concept as BellaMiles presented)
- Use "Quote" to open a reply.
- Delete the [Quote] codes at top and bottom.
- Preserve the previous poster's name, Post #, and (if possible) a link to the reply to which you are replying.
- Write your reply.
- You may edit down the previous post if appropriate, but preserve the premise for context.
- Post your reply.
Last edited: